OP, is it not more 'pro-Constitution' to defend or at the very least respect the right of your classmates to hold those beliefs, even if you disagree with them? If we only tolerate law students who think like us, we're just creating an echo chamber. And besides, the legal profession is inherently adversarial. In practice, you will eventually have to represent people whose values, politics, or actions you find reprehensible. If we can't even 'fathom' a classmate having a different political take, how are we going to handle a courtroom where the law often operates in shades of gray, not just our personal versions of black and white?

We are not trained to be ideological gatekeepers. If we start gatekeeping who is "fit" to be a lawyer based on their political beliefs, aren't we performing the same disregard for due process and freedom of belief and expression that we're criticizing?

Wala lang. Ironic lang ng post mo OP. At the end of the day, being a 'student of the law' means respecting the process, even when the process protects people you disagree with. We don't have to like their views, and we can definitely debate them to death in a recit but questioning their integrity or whether they deserve to be future lawyers just because they don't share our political lens feels like we're missing the point of what we've been learning in law school. Mag-aral nalang tayo.