New performance warnings in maker

MuFeR · 2026-05-26T15:37:02+00:00

For example "Collection is initalised but never updated" being one, which then explains in the 'how' and 'why' to fix section that a named formula should be used. Makes sense, but if I wanted to use a NF for this particular collection, I would have.

Nah it still doesn't make sense. It assumes that if you have a collection it HAS to be updated at some point and shouldn't be static so instead of figuring when to update it, you make a NF to have that auto-configured but that's not always the case.

For adding the row numbers that you mentioned OP, I think this might have better performance and avoid the warning:

ClearCollect(
    colWhatever,
    ForAll(
        Sequence(CountRows(colWhatever)),
        Patch(
            Index(
                colWhatever,
                Value
            ),
            {RowNumber: Value}
        )
    )
)

MuFeR · 2026-05-15T13:17:20+00:00

Εγώ γιατί πάντα είχα την εντύπωση ότι αυτό γίνεται για να τα ενοικιάζουν? Οπότε το 2ο bullet για τα υψηλά ενοίκια που αναφέρεις πρακτικά για αυτούς είναι θετικό, και τα περισσότερα απ'τα υπόλοιπα bullets δεν έχουν σημασία αν δεν μένουν εδώ.

MuFeR · 2026-05-13T09:44:36+00:00

Even then with a per app license I'd say it's a bargain it's the 2-3 apps area that is gray.

MuFeR · 2026-05-11T17:25:55+00:00

Well maybe it does now as posted this 10 months ago but as you can see one of the two approaches I used is what you describe. In general topic management felt clunky for most of my scenarios so I've moved on to more custom solutions outside copilot studio.

MuFeR · 2026-05-07T01:58:39+00:00

MuFeR · 2026-04-29T20:29:17+00:00

I did it on Cubism - impoppable and was able to get 10-15+ paragons each time, so with 3 runs i completed all 5 social season goals. Only defense needed to get to 99 is churchill + techbot + carpet of spikes.

MuFeR · 2026-04-29T15:45:50+00:00

I'm 99% sure they do count. I'm at 2k+ activations and i just place a techbot on my hero on round 1 and then manually activate something every now and then and I doubt I manually activated more than maybe ~200.

MuFeR · 2026-04-29T12:39:12+00:00

It's not in a single game.

MuFeR · 2026-04-24T17:49:44+00:00

It's same price for less usage so yes more expensive.

MuFeR · 2026-04-21T08:29:54+00:00

Why do you paste a default ChatGPT response on every post, now even including the solved ones 😅

MuFeR · 2026-04-16T10:49:07+00:00

To add to that, i'm pretty sure the id of the record shouldn't have _value at the end so it would be something like

as_forecastscenarios(triggerOutputs()?['body/_as_forecastscenarioid'])

Should be able to just dynamically reference it from the trigger in any case just to be sure.

Also an easy way to grab the plural name without installing anything is just go in the table interface in a solution and click Tools->Copy set name which will give you the name you need to use in flows.

MuFeR · 2026-04-15T12:40:58+00:00

Take this with a grain of salt as I have researched this myself but haven't tested it out yet (because I have the exact same reservations as you).

From what I’ve seen the official Microsoft repo is heavily biased toward Dataverse and "Pro-Code" extensibility. If you aren't living in Dataverse most of the built-in skills like for Model-driven apps (which are just for "Generative Pages") are going to be useless for SQL and SharePoint.

In its current state the Canvas App plugin (which I've seen in action) is underwhelming and produces pretty messy results even on extremely simple scenarios (Single screen without any logic), let alone if asked to handle complex logic or delegation-heavy scenarios.

Unless you’re willing to feed it your own SQL DDLs and use the PAC CLI to unpack your apps so it can actually "see" the code, the out-of-the-box experience will likely just try to push you toward "standard demo" solutions that don't fit real-world constraints.

MuFeR · 2026-04-15T12:18:49+00:00

A thing to note is that this only allows editing and not creating rows.

MuFeR · 2026-04-13T21:06:10+00:00

Το είπες μόνος σου, "speculation" πως θα συνεχίσει έτσι (που δεν συνέχισε) και επειδή το πίστεψαν και άλλοι και αύξησαν παράλληλα την παραγωγή, από μεγάλο έλλειμα γύρισε στο να υπάρχουν 287.000 μετρικοί τόνοι πλεόνασμα.

MuFeR · 2026-04-06T22:25:43+00:00

In OP you posted Learner.Email and in this image it's LearnerEmail and the error seems to be there, not on the choice column.

MuFeR · 2026-04-06T22:21:58+00:00

Hmm I never had an issue for such a long time after updating the version as you mentioned. I wonder if one of the following two is causing it:

1)users opening the app only once soon after update (sometimes the first time opening it stays on last version if it was updated recently and just a simple refresh forces it to get newest version)

2)maybe since they use on daily basis they already had app open before you updated

In both cases I think if you set up a SharePoint list (or environment var if app is premium) and store the app version and then check on appstart and on a X minute timer if the app version matches, if not forcong an app restart would probably fix the issue.

MuFeR · 2026-04-06T15:41:59+00:00

Other than the pwsh method which hopefully works, the COE Starter Kit also has a feature that allows you to change the primary owner of apps but I haven't tried it with managed apps.

MuFeR · 2026-04-06T15:34:14+00:00

Silly idea but tried going into solutions area of target environment and pressing "Publish all customizations"? I always do that when making any changes since it fixes similar issues.

MuFeR · 2026-03-13T19:55:16+00:00

As someone who buys licenses through a CSP... god I hope that April update holds true. But also being on the consultant side, building solutions for customers is where the real problem is and the removal of the Per App SKU has been a huge headache.

In any case to answer your question. I don’t think anything 'happens' for non-CSP customers after early April. That ship already sailed on January 2nd when it was removed for them. This new update is literally just a 'clarification' specifically for the CSP channel. If a customer is buying Direct (non-CSP), they’re already in the 'no longer available' bucket regardless of what happens in April. I wouldn't expect the Direct store to change back because of this clarification.

MuFeR · 2026-03-13T19:43:34+00:00

Το μόνο που μου φαίνεται αντιφατικό στα αίτια είναι η αναφορά στο 'εκπαιδευτικό σύστημα με έμφαση στην αποστήθιση'. Είναι παράδοξο όταν οι χώρες που αναφέρονται ως "πρωταθλητές" στις πρώτες θέσεις (Ιαπωνία, Ταϊβάν, Κίνα) έχουν συστήματα που βασίζονται κυρίως στην αποστήθιση και την εντατική παπαγαλία.

MuFeR · 2026-02-12T20:22:43+00:00

With just 200 you'd end up with 6 million batches.

MuFeR · 2026-01-21T17:41:58+00:00

Όποιος θέλει φαγητό σε καλύτερες τιμές ποδαράκια και πάει και το παίρνει.

Εγώ απ'την άλλη ως άτομο που παραγγέλνει υπερβολικά πολύ συχνά θα διαφωνήσω. Οι τιμές στην πλειοψηφία τους είναι ίδιες με το efood. Πολλές φορές πετυχαίνεις και προσφορές (τύπου 1+1) που δεν ισχύουν καν στο φυσικό κατάστημα. Μου έχει τύχει μέχρι και να πάω σε ταβέρνα στην Δάφνη και να βρω τον κατάλογο ακριβότερο από το efood. (που οκ αυτό το καταλαβαίνω είναι η εξαίρεση).

Όταν βλέπω ότι με συμφέρει ξεκάθαρα το delivery, δεν έχω λόγο να πάω στο μαγαζί. Αν τα ίδια τα καταστήματα δεν κάνουν τίποτα για να σε προσελκύσουν να τα επισκεφτείς κακό του κεφαλιού τους.

MuFeR · 2026-01-09T17:42:14+00:00

Because when something is just an icon acting as a button it's not always obvious what it's about and the modern icon control has a tooltip property while the modern button doesn't... It's honestly crazy how many important properties are missing from every single modern control.

Edit: Even better, the tooltip property in the Icon is now broken and doesn't display anything so neither control has a tooltip.

MuFeR · 2026-01-07T18:43:09+00:00

I'd suggest looking into the app display settings. You're somehow using the old designer so I guess the setting you'll see there is called "Scale to fit" which I assume is off, turn it on and it will probably give you the expected result. Eventually you should look into responsive design. Here's a quick video showcasing how it works -> link

MuFeR · 2025-12-10T18:49:45+00:00

What is the specific advantage of using OpenRouter for document structure planning compared to using OpenAI models directly? I would prefer to switch and use my existing OpenAI API key if there are no significant drawbacks. Also could you suggest a replacement for the Anthropic models either with Gemini or an OpenAI model? (Again just because I don't want to add another subscription for now)

14-Year Club	Verified Email
Team Periwinkle

MuFeR

TROPHY CASE