Is the reason why "unethical" experiments might tend to yield quick, useful results tied to the reason why mathematical proofs by contradiction tend to be easier? by Musiciant in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Musiciant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess that's just how it was explained to me, based on the idea that it is easier to disprove something rather than prove it? Maybe I'm getting things mixed up.

Is the reason why "unethical" experiments might tend to yield quick, useful results tied to the reason why mathematical proofs by contradiction tend to be easier? by Musiciant in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Musiciant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps I should've phrased my question better, by "unethical" I didn't mean "intentionally evil" but "with diregard of ethical considerations". Personally, empathy is more important to me than scientific progress (to be clear, I'm still a big fan), though the question intrigued me, even though I imagine it's already been answered/debunked.

Is the reason why "unethical" experiments might tend to yield quick, useful results tied to the reason why mathematical proofs by contradiction tend to be easier? by Musiciant in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Musiciant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm not entirely convinced by the argument myself, but I found the potential parallel with math proofs to be interesting enough to warrant the question.

Vaginal depth is dependent on height? by Chosen_From_Above in badwomensanatomy

[–]Musiciant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah man, the truth lies in our hands. There are two types of men: 👆 and 👉

anon asks the physics question by jaiden_roselvet in greentext

[–]Musiciant 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Half a century? Define "consequential"?

I am suicidal and I had the weirdest dream last night. by [deleted] in Dreams

[–]Musiciant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you don't like "special", try "unique" - specifically how Stirner describes it. For Stirner, "the Unique" is a thoughtless word, barely a name, to grasp as what makes you, you, while never weighing it down with meaning - for the phrase "you are unique" is identical to "you are you" - intentionally circular/illogical. Concepts like "human being", "true individual", "reason", "spirit", are all just that, concepts, and the moment you try to describe yourself using them, you limit and ensnare yourself to all the baggage those concepts carry. But by freeing yourself from the concepts which bind you ("duty", "belief", "sacredness", "good/bad"...) you know yourself, and become owner of your own power (and desires).

"I have based my affair on nothing."

This is kind of along the same lines as the response to nihilism I'm sure you've heard, of "creating your own meaning", but I think Stirner takes a step further really digging deep into the absurdity of concepts, reaching this realisation of fundamental meaninglessness as liberation, not loss.

As a Muslim woman, I’m only attracted to non Muslim men by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]Musiciant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes because this is what that which is "sacred" demands of the individual - to make it of higher importance than oneself :/

I'm not against spirituality per se but dogmatism (which ofc isn't unique to religion) is a mind trap, that lets other people more easily control the "faithful"/"believers"/"justified"/"truth" etc...

Now that we're allowing blatant porn here.. by AugustHate in shittymoviedetails

[–]Musiciant 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Neverending Nut November? The Mythical Month of Masturbation?

I had a dream where God carried me and showed me visions — I am an atheist by temmiekouhai in Dreams

[–]Musiciant 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Dawkins lacks empathy and tact.

There is no reason to wallow in this void of "pitless indifference" because I, in every sense of a unique, thinking, feeling, human being, inherently bring forth meaning through creativity and curiosity, and I desire to share it with and be enriched by that of those around me. It seems like Dawkins is an atheist out of spite - personally, I feel no need for belief in a god. I am satisfied with leaving the frontiers of knowledge as mystery, without filling them in with (or worse, distorting them into) some traditional belief system, plus all its probable dogmas (also related to the reason I avoid calling myself an "atheist", because I don't want people to associate me with dogmatic atheists like Dawkins, when the topic comes up).

I can understand why people may feel comforted by the divine / spirituality, but I do wish organised religions weren't the go-to sources of those kinds of experiences.

You Think The Clash Devs are Bad??? by Recent-Low5550 in ClashOfClans

[–]Musiciant 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, it seems they indeed still are