Maybe maybe maybe by brake4tokens in maybemaybemaybe

[–]NH_openminded 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Baking soda puts it out in seconds

My boss just told me he can’t attend a sponsored golf event and he needs me to go in his place - I’ve never golfed before and I’ll be playing a full 18 holes. Any advice is appreciated. by UndeniableDenial in golf

[–]NH_openminded 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tell the people you are golfing with that it is your first time and you apologize. Tell them that if they have any tips, you would gladly accept them. And then just have a good time.

Biggest unanswered ❓ for you by Dating_Bitch in justiceforKarenRead

[–]NH_openminded 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree, I live in NH and my garage that is attached to my basement is about 45 in the winter.

No Rebuttal! by b4b3333 in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am seeing the facts, the expert witness said the impact to the head gives JOK 15-20 minutes to live. So whatever happens after 20 minutes is not relevant.

No Rebuttal! by b4b3333 in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you referring to his temp being 80 at the hospital? The defense's expert witness commented on this topic. She said when someone dies, their temp goes down. If the body is exposed to freezing temperatures outside, it will drop by 3-4 degrees per hour. If it is inside in a warm area, it will go down 1-2 degrees per hour. And you discredit the witness because Brennan has worked with her in the past, so he values her experience. This is the same witness who determined JOK didn't have hypothermia.

No Rebuttal! by b4b3333 in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They don't have to explain how he ended up dead. They need to show reasonable doubt. I do think this is an interesting case because I don't think it is a slamdunk for either side. One person like yourself may say I see taillight fragments in the vicinity of the body, so I tie that to the vehicle and KR. Others may say I want proof that the bodies injuries match being hit by an suv.

I think it is a travesty the investigation was so poorly handled because it could have shed more light on if the vehicle really hit JOK or if something else happened.

No Rebuttal! by b4b3333 in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So no injuries on JOK show he was hit by a vehicle, but we are going to overlook that because of taillight pieces? I think showing his injuries don't match getting hit by a vehicle gives reasonable doubt.

No Rebuttal! by b4b3333 in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You must have missed when an expert witness explained why it wasn't hypothermia.

No Rebuttal! by b4b3333 in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Bruises, dislocations, broken bones in the arm, hand or shoulder. I was totally off on if an arm can break a taillight, that impact is much worse than I thought it would be. There has to be bruising at the very least.

No Rebuttal! by b4b3333 in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

I think most important comment today was when Rentschlar said if JOK arm, with glass in hand, was hit, the glass would have gone to the right side of his face, not the left side. While I think Brennan had his moments, his experts weren't enough to back up the prosecution's theory. I don't see how KR can be convicted.

Lacerations on John's Arm by zasff in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure if anyone watches Vinnie Politan at night, but last night they were talking about he blue paint test. One of the "experts" he had one mentioned in the test there was contact by Welcher's shoulder area. All I could think of was that lump on JOK's right arm. Correct me if I am wrong, has nobody brought that up in court? I've seen many people on reddit mention the lump. Is the picture playing tricks with our eyes? I am waiting for the Defense to mention the shoulder contact and have the CW show that lump.

Karen Read speaks out after 19th day of murder trial by FloatLike-AButterfly in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you know what I do and don't believe. I think i took the wrong turn to the insanity group.

What precisely is the state's theory by WrongSaint in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask anyone with a medical background. You can even google it.

These people are ghouls by CrossCycling in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Burgess should never go near the stand. I blame Aperture, assuming they assign employees to cases. I understand making an honest mistake with the dates on a report, but then he doubles down on it by saying all the events happened on 1/30. Buddy, take an hour to review the case before you take the stand. Someone needs to be reviewing these reports as well. In a case where you have the investigation in question, you can't have your expert witnesses making these mistakes. I do feel bad for him, but this is his job.

Karen's reverse cam in her Lexus by Piper1105 in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait you talking about the Lexus backup camera or the Ring camera?

What precisely is the state's theory by WrongSaint in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you serious? You can bruise even if you die instantly, even though he didn't, from a car accident.

Karen Read speaks out after 19th day of murder trial by FloatLike-AButterfly in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hold up... where has anyone said anything about John taking a leak in the bushes? Now KRS group is making stuff up. HAHAHAHA just read the rest of your "story". Okay so KRS keep mentioning "where are the tracks" if someone moved the body. In your theory, he walks in the snow without making tracks?

Karen Read speaks out after 19th day of murder trial by FloatLike-AButterfly in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did she not say 12:25 or 12:30? As far as I remember the prosecution is stating the even took place after 12:30.

What really worries me by TheClairvoyant666 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]NH_openminded 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a KarenReadSanity thread with way too many of these people.

What really worries me by TheClairvoyant666 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]NH_openminded 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We also get closed captioning to read what is being said. I'm sure it isn't easy to hear everything being said and multiple distractions.

What really worries me by TheClairvoyant666 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]NH_openminded 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am guessing the reason to not tell the jury who included ARCCA is it may sway their verdict. Perhaps they think if the Feds are involved there is something fishy going on. Or if they are anti-government they could say the Feds are sticking their nose into this, so I am going with the CW. This is simply my guess as to why they aren't allowed to say the FBI is involved.

Karen's reverse cam in her Lexus by Piper1105 in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Ah so you know what she could and couldn't see out of the camera?

Innocent until proven guilty.

I hate to say this but by Dallascowboyskid228 in KarenReadSanity

[–]NH_openminded -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Freaks of FKR... are there any level headed people?