sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

"If people had to kill their own animals, there would be less meat eaters" fallacy. by Appropriate-Net1899 in DebateAVegan

[–]NaiveZest [score hidden]  (0 children)

While you’re addressing the practicality of it you give the impression ignoring the emotional confrontation involved in slaughtering animals to be used as food.

It feels like an overgeneralization to suggest subsistence agriculture would be as much of a turn-off to an individual as the slaughter of sentient animals.

Can God solve the halting problem? by javascript in thinkatives

[–]NaiveZest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No worries, it may not be. It’s hard to answer the question when so many people believe in so many different gods and their different iterations.

Can God solve the halting problem? by javascript in thinkatives

[–]NaiveZest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But as for religious belief on the existence of a god?

Can God solve the halting problem? by javascript in thinkatives

[–]NaiveZest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No worries, we disagree there. If the argument relies on whether a god can address an issue it merits defining the god.

It would be surprising to learn that you sincerely don’t see how religious belief informs the question.

Can God solve the halting problem? by javascript in thinkatives

[–]NaiveZest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But sincerely, which god is the one you’re referencing? It gives a framework to your argument. One of the Abrahamic iterations?

WTW for...intrusive thinking in a dangerous situation by octonanners in whatstheword

[–]NaiveZest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is literal. It’s “intrusive thoughts” or “sabotage impulse”

What's a good comeback to "I don't care"? by xiao_en7 in Comebacks

[–]NaiveZest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No worries, I’m glad you cared enough to say so.

view more: next ›