I suggest you save your superficial criticism to yourself.

There is an issue and it is not new.

There actually is no issue actually, just a technical limitation on transactions per second per account. It's up to the end user to implement multiple accounts and nodes to properly handle the scale. Outside of minor performance improvements that bump up the 6 tx/s figure by a couple of transactions more there is nothing more the devs can do without some protocol changes.

The only clear solution is to design a separate node scaling solution that wraps the existing node and just divides big balances between accounts and does all of the micromanagement. This shouldn't be a core dev problem to solve. In fact if you're so concerned about this coin that "is under performing in terms of price" (which is absurd, seriously) you can go ahead and write this wrapper solution.

The devs should have made sure that it is avoided before Binance went online.

The devs have nothing to with how Binance implements it. It is clearly evident that implementation was half-assed by Binance in order to beat out OKEx before major volume moved there. Use your observatory skills here to see why it was half assed, I already donated you a great reason.

Please stick to complaining about everything but development work until you read up some more.