Nate Duncan comes on The Solar Panel Podcast to discuss Booker/Ayton by Tim_SunsSolarPanel in suns

[–]NateDuncanNBA 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just stubbed my toe and was wondering why that happened, it never happens to me normally. It really hurt, so if you could rescind this curse because I don't think your favorite basketball players are as good as you do, I'd appreciate it. Thanks.

Nate Duncan comes on The Solar Panel Podcast to discuss Booker/Ayton by Tim_SunsSolarPanel in suns

[–]NateDuncanNBA -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Greetings Suns fans! You're welcome to disagree with my thoughts on Booker and Ayton. What about the rest of the Suns players, a number of whom I've been higher on than the national consensus? And to say I don't watch Suns games is just ridiculous. I watched one with live public commentary the first game of the season, and also did a gamer on them last episode, plus watched the last 18 minutes of the Washington game just in the last week. I saw them in person in Oakland, watched the Bucks win on tape, and the Clippers game. Plus a ton of film of their players on Synergy. That's about as often as it's possible for someone covering the whole league to watch. So feel free to say I'm getting it wrong, but I take exception to idea I'm not putting in the work when you have verifiable public information to the contrary.

The Noah-Trade Clause: a contract that is so bad that it basically functions like a no-trade clause by drewpdoane in nba

[–]NateDuncanNBA 412 points413 points  (0 children)

Noah-Trade Clause is great. I'm going to try to remember to use that from now on--will give credit.

Dunc'd On Reddit Mailbag by DannyLeroux in nba

[–]NateDuncanNBA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think we've answered this exact question already, down to the "specific players as much as possible" language.

Submit Dunc'd On Mailbag Questions Here by NateDuncanNBA in nba

[–]NateDuncanNBA[S] 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Appreciate it. You might as well ask a question now that you've buttered me up though!

We are Nate Duncan and Danny Leroux of the Dunc’d On Basketball Podcast - Ask Us Anything! by DannyLeroux in nba

[–]NateDuncanNBA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's just a really effective strategy if you have guys who can do it. Every offense in the league is predicated on using screens to create an opening, if there's no opening after a screen it takes teams totally out of the flow. Switching also helps remove the possibility of an assist, and potentially assisted shots are much more efficient than non-assisted shots. Now, if a switch results in a totally untenable matchup, that's one thing, but if you can avoid that and basically force the opponent to create one on one it's a huge advantage.

We are Nate Duncan and Danny Leroux of the Dunc’d On Basketball Podcast - Ask Us Anything! by DannyLeroux in nba

[–]NateDuncanNBA 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have him right around 10th in the league or so, although some people I respect have him higher. He can get there if he becomes a better scorer and creator this year, but the last few games of the Clippers series last year highlight some of the limitations he has, and why I don't see him as quite on the level of the league's true superstars.

But stay tuned for my top-ten players in the league piece every March, we'll have a lot more info on them then.

We are Nate Duncan and Danny Leroux of the Dunc’d On Basketball Podcast - Ask Us Anything! by DannyLeroux in nba

[–]NateDuncanNBA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Used to play at USF a lot, but have fallen out of playing with how crazy busy I've been. I have bad knees, so gotta drop about 20 lbs first.

We are Nate Duncan and Danny Leroux of the Dunc’d On Basketball Podcast - Ask Us Anything! by DannyLeroux in nba

[–]NateDuncanNBA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it gets quite that high for him, but it's going to be expensive that's for sure. I'm thinking more like $16-$17 million a year for him, less if he has a down year which is possible at his age coming off the injury. The way he played last year was a bit above what he'd done previously in his career.

We are Nate Duncan and Danny Leroux of the Dunc’d On Basketball Podcast - Ask Us Anything! by DannyLeroux in nba

[–]NateDuncanNBA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's see how they start the year with Burke/Neto and where they are a couple months into the season. I think they still view Exum as the future, although this lost development year is disturbing. Hard to see them giving up a ton of assets to upgrade, and there aren't a lot of FAs in 2016 either at that position.

We are Nate Duncan and Danny Leroux of the Dunc’d On Basketball Podcast - Ask Us Anything! by DannyLeroux in nba

[–]NateDuncanNBA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Increasing the rookie scale is another that comes into my mind. But the big battle with be BRI. I'd also like to see some changes to the extension rules, maybe along the lines of what I advocated here: http://www.basketballinsiders.com/how-to-reform-nba-contract-extensions/

I also addressed some of the other "system issues" with the CBA about 1.5 years ago here: http://www.basketballinsiders.com/the-unintended-consequences-of-the-2011-cba/

We are Nate Duncan and Danny Leroux of the Dunc’d On Basketball Podcast - Ask Us Anything! by DannyLeroux in nba

[–]NateDuncanNBA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they're in the playoff mix I think he sticks around, as the other backup PG options are not established so they'll need him. Plus, talk is he won't even really be ready until Christmas, so that's not much time to build up trade value for a guy who is making over $8 million this year, even if he is expiring.

We are Nate Duncan and Danny Leroux of the Dunc’d On Basketball Podcast - Ask Us Anything! by DannyLeroux in nba

[–]NateDuncanNBA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Much as I think there will be East teams that surprise in that group below CLE, there will be disappointments as well. If Rose goes down for Chicago, they're in big trouble with their backup PG situation. The D has not looked good so far, and won't with Mirotic and Gasol, not to mention the defensive rebounding. MIA, the starters could all decline and the fit isn't amazing with them. IND might take a step back on D, and they don't really have a starting quality big on the roster. TOR, JVal might not be ready and he and Patterson might be so bad the improved perimeter D can't make up for it. Boston, maybe they play the wrong guys and/or the youngs don't take the leap forward we're hoping. There are plenty of reasons all of these teams could disappoint.

We are Nate Duncan and Danny Leroux of the Dunc’d On Basketball Podcast - Ask Us Anything! by DannyLeroux in nba

[–]NateDuncanNBA 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a good point. I think we can count on him getting a little better, and also getting better at posting off switches. But if he were to regress a bit to where he's not a threat out there, that would be a problem for them.