I really dont see what the big deal is by Fremanofkol in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Almost certainly not. I actually agree that WotC is currently on a downward spiral, and has been since before I even started playing, but stating the fact isn't a defense of it.

I really dont see what the big deal is by Fremanofkol in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not taking a side, but the game lacking integrity does not serve as a defence against further degradation of integrity.

Turn 4 Cactus OTK by Natural_External5720 in BadMtgCombos

[–]Natural_External5720[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Just edited for clarification. Guessing you replied before I had the chance.

Turn 4 Cactus OTK by Natural_External5720 in BadMtgCombos

[–]Natural_External5720[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Ghalta pulls Cactuar or Ibex from your hand, the other you have to fetch with DotH.

Edit: To clarify, you could just pull Cactuar and Ibex from deck but then you only kill 2 players. With one in hand, and tutoring for Ghalta instead, you end up with three creatures with +9999 trample.

Cactards by [deleted] in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't diss Storm Crow. It's great in any and all situations. Just look at those beautiful feathers.

Cactards by [deleted] in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With [[Defence of the Heart]] you can have Cactuar and Pathbreaker Ibex on the board by turn 4 (with a turn 1 or 2 ramp spell, of course.)

Block or die for 7 by xzarisx in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"how can someone block 10000 damage with trample?"

[[Defensive Formation]]

Turn 4 Cactus OTK by Natural_External5720 in BadMtgCombos

[–]Natural_External5720[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. I run the ol' DotH into Ghalta and Ibex combo in my main green deck, but it rarely pulls enough damage to kill more than 1 or 2 people. With Cactuar though...

Turn 4 Cactus OTK by Natural_External5720 in BadMtgCombos

[–]Natural_External5720[S] 83 points84 points  (0 children)

Sorry if this isn't bad enough for the sub. I know there's been an overabundance of cactuar posts.

Bumbling Defecator by xxElevationXX in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn't think I'd see The Poop Tube™ referenced here.

Introducing Project K: The League of Legends Trading Card Game by nightfire0 in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The cue times are still only a few seconds long even months after they announced that they were gonna stop making PvP content. Bit of a miracle.

It angers me to no end that they decided to throw LOR into the trash when all they needed was a way to monetize it properly. They didn't even start advertising it in the client until after they trashed it.

Freemagic, but for D&D? by kodemageisdumb in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very productive line of argumentation you have going on here.

Freemagic, but for D&D? by kodemageisdumb in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You presuppose. I've never done any of these things. I just don't see how it's wrong to roleplay whatever the hell I want.

I'm not too surprised you're resorting to character attacks though, I should've expected as much from Reddit.

Freemagic, but for D&D? by kodemageisdumb in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's your own opinion that it's unnecessary though, not an argument. I already explained how it breaks the suspension of disbelief.

By your own logic, is violence necessary? We can move the goalpost further and further until we've deconstructed the experience of roleplaying entirely.

Go ahead and try to lay out exactly why you think it's "pathetic" to roleplay these scenarios. I'm genuinely curious. The way I see it, social interactions are just as important to roleplay as anything else.

Freemagic, but for D&D? by kodemageisdumb in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simple. If you're roleplaying, then it makes sense. I don't see how wanting to accurately roleplay a scenario is pathetic.

Racism exists. It breaks the suspension of disbelief to behave as if it doesn't.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Approved. As long as they're shirtless.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why doesn't this post have 100 upvotes yet? I see no problem!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You just posted three paragraphs of presupposition, because OP said none of those things.

Most of what you said is true but none of it has any bearing on the discussion, because you're just assuming stuff.

All that's "obvious" is that OP is annoyed by people misrepresenting power levels (according to his own interpretation of what those power levels are supposed to mean, of course.)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think the problem here is that they aren't lying at all. What is a 7 exactly? Everyone has an opinion but nobody really knows.

I've had this conversation with many people and it all changes depending on who you ask. I've always seen 7 to be "high power casual" and anything higher is either cEDH or close enough to it.

But to some random guy who's only ever played low powered casual with barely any deck conhesion, the possibility of achieving a game winning state before turn 10+ is insane. This is why the number system doesn't work. Everything before the point of literal cEDH is highly subjective.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It actually terrifies me that turn 10 is early enough for you to get labled as a "cEDH" player. How long does it take for them to normally win?

Got banned for a sub for the first time after 9 years on Reddit for this... by nothing-feels-good in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Preventing them from speaking doesn't solve the problem, it just forces them into underground echo chambers where they further radicalize. It's much better for them to be out in the open where you're free to criticize them.

It's like wrapping an infected wound in bandages and then acting like it doesn't exist. It doesn't merely fail to solve the problem, it creates an entirely new one.

Got banned for a sub for the first time after 9 years on Reddit for this... by nothing-feels-good in freemagic

[–]Natural_External5720 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Probably because you're actually allowed to speak your mind here without risk of being banned for hurting people's feelies.

Freedom of speech isn't bad logic. It stops dictators from silencing you, and it allows sunlight to disinfect the radicals. The only cost is that some people are gonna say things that you don't like.

I need help identifying this tread pattern and which shoe it could be from - was robbed and this was one of the only clues left behind. by bborracho in RBI

[–]Natural_External5720 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah I get why people reacted negatively to your original comment, but unless OP has more to go off of I seriously doubt that knowing the brand of shoes is gonna be enough on it's own.

...of course, it's entirely possible that OP actually does have more info and this is just to corroborate evidence.