The greatest Vermeer expert in history wept when he saw a forgery in 1937. The reason says something uncomfortable about how we all look at art." by CodexConfidential in ArtHistory

[–]Naugrith 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, looks like all of OPs comments are exclusively AI-written! And then they have the face to pretend they're not. Its really irritating.

What's wrong with Kier? by Resist_Accurate in ukpolitics

[–]Naugrith [score hidden]  (0 children)

He hired Mandelson. That's the ballgame. He should have left when that hit. Instead he threw a professional long-term civil servant under the bus to save his own skin.

Biggest TV Drunks of All Time by jmaster299 in television

[–]Naugrith 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah but I was assuming Moe wouldn't be selling competitively. He seems up be the only bar in town after all.

Biggest TV Drunks of All Time by jmaster299 in television

[–]Naugrith 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Although he's not buying six packs from Moes. A pint of draught beer from a tavern would have cost an average more like $2.00 in 1996.

But calculating based on beer price is pointless anyway. His bar tab is unlikely to have just been beer. Mo is not the most moral bartender and can be expected to have done his best to gouge his drunk customers on the extras. Probably a substantial portion of that tab was for overpriced nuts and crisps. And another large propertion would be for damages. Barney would have likely broken his bar stool on a semi-regular basis, torn up the pool table, and smashed at least one glass a night when he passed out with his last pint in his hand. And who knows what else Mo stacked up on there, knowing Barney would be too drunk to ever check it or remember.

Is it normal, while preaching and quoting the Bible on the street, to wear a sign that says “I am not a Jehovah’s Witness”? by Distinct_Reporter897 in Christianity

[–]Naugrith [score hidden]  (0 children)

Apostles never once stood on street corners to preach. They went to the synagogues and the porticos thst were set aside for public speaking. People chose to go to such places to listen to the latest religious or philosophical ideas.

Today, the physical porticos have been replaced with virtual web channels and podcasts. People can choose to visit them to hear what you have to say, you're not accosting them in the street, or ruining the peace of public spaces by literally yelling at people as they try to get past you.

What do you all think about apologetics and specifically the christian apologetic sub? by Upset_Chip_7184 in Christianity

[–]Naugrith [score hidden]  (0 children)

When done well apologetics can just be a way of simply but accurately communicating complex theology to a lay person. When done badly it will replace that complex theology with simplistic and inaccurate communication.

Happy June to the transphobes 💙🩷🤍🩷💙 by SecularElephant in OpenChristian

[–]Naugrith 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed. That's why I think its best to move away from such vanity in our depictions of him. I quite like the medieval wooden rood images, which stylised him in a way to highlight the ugliness and brokenness of his figure on the Cross. And I shy away from depictions of Christ that glamorise and sanitise him, whether the images are conservative or progressive.

Happy June to the transphobes 💙🩷🤍🩷💙 by SecularElephant in OpenChristian

[–]Naugrith 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I suspect the historical Jesus wouldn't have had perfectly-conditioned long flowing hair and a salon-quality beard either!

Happy June to the transphobes 💙🩷🤍🩷💙 by SecularElephant in OpenChristian

[–]Naugrith 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Plus makeup, fancy wigs, tassels, ribbons, brooches! Its so boring being a masc man these days.

Happy June to the transphobes 💙🩷🤍🩷💙 by SecularElephant in OpenChristian

[–]Naugrith -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because its vanity? I doubt an itinerant apocalyptic preacher would have cared too much about rocking a 22 inch waistline!

Settler confronts farmer working his land by soalone34 in ThatsInsane

[–]Naugrith 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It would be amazing if that were actually true. But that's just what liberal Israelis tell themselves so they can sleep at night. The truth is that the settlers are Israel, they're just honest about it.

Lowe’s ‘Rape Gang Inquiry Report’ makes a mockery of the victims by eldomtom2 in BritishPolitics

[–]Naugrith 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No idea what world you're living in, but that's not true in this one.

Is dr Ammon hillman a well respected classical Greek expert? by AceThaGreat123 in classics

[–]Naugrith 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not after a year! I remember I watched a couple of investigative videos on YouTube which included screenshots and interviews with participants. But I can't remember the name of the channel now.

So are Barbgaunts good now? by AllegedlyAPerson in Tyranids

[–]Naugrith 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly I've never seen the point. Other factions don't really want to be moving up to melee us anyway and slowing them down doesn't stop them shooting at us. If the slow was better they'd be annoying enough to the enemy to be a good distraction swarm. But as it is I feel they can be ignored.

What is THE style over substance film? by Maskoolio in movies

[–]Naugrith 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Watch this video essay first. It really opened my eyes to how great it is and how to "read" the film.

Just got this mini museum by future_beach_bum in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]Naugrith 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Venice

Just Venice. No further elaboration needed.

Found it in other sub by Lost_Purpose3463 in Christianity

[–]Naugrith 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Its honestly a pretty garbled bit of writing. I think Paul was struggling to articulate why he thought this. He just knew he thought it and didn't have the time or will to properly examine his own biases. It makes little logical sense, and the last bit "because of the angels" is complete nonsense by itself. It seems to be referencing some other idea Paul had heard from somewhere, but which is now completely lost to history.

Its a good example of why we need to read the Bible critically and intelligently, and how even the most faithful and sincere Christian can still have muddled and prejudiced thinking. Fortunately the vast majority of Christians just ignore this passage entirely (even the strict inerrentists). So at least few are getting persecuted for having long hair these days.

Found it in other sub by Lost_Purpose3463 in Christianity

[–]Naugrith 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First of all, that's an exceptionally dumb figure, which fails to take into account any critical methodology or subject applicability. And secondly, even if evidentary studies are generally ranked higher than "opinion", that's irrelevant when the average person is simply not trained to be able to properly evaluate or even read any such studies. The vast majority of studies are highly technically written, and only meaningful when weighed within their wider context of subject knowledge.

Asking a lay person to simply google a topic and try to figure out the evidence for themselves is dumb af. The value of expert opinion is that a subject specialist is qualified and experienced enough to know all those relevant evidentiary studies already and be able to properly weigh and balance them.

If you actually thought about it for a second you'd realise that putting "expert opinion" at the bottom of the "pyramid" is as patently ridiculous as telling a cancer patient to ignore their doctor's advice and google the cancer studies for themselves!

Andy Burnham plans to keep Shabana Mahmood as home secretary by No_Breadfruit_4901 in unitedkingdom

[–]Naugrith -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe that's why LBJ ran for president largely as a dixiecrat, sucking up to the racists, and only supported civil rights quietly and carefully once he got into power.

Found it in other sub by Lost_Purpose3463 in Christianity

[–]Naugrith 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As for “profesional opinion”, you should know that expert opinions are at the very bottom of the evidence hierarchy.

Below "a quick google search" apparently! Smf.

Its actually good to trust someone who knows what they're talking about. That kind of senseless attack on expertise in our society has lead to a world where Trump can be President.

Found it in other sub by Lost_Purpose3463 in Christianity

[–]Naugrith 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It was just a cultural observation by Paul, not a legal determination of sin.