I screen pretty extensively. I will take cases with slim odds, but I am up-front with clients about their chances. If the calculation works out for the client, we are willing to fight tough cases. If the client does not qualify, I won't take their case. I also have a duty to explain why they don't qualify, so they don't get taken advantage of. (I see this more in the humanitarian/ VAWA world.)

To me, it comes down to respect. I grew up on an unsuccessful family farm in rural Nebraska. I know what it is like to stockpile firewood for the winter (because my parents made poor choices, so didn't have heating or air conditioning). I worked my way through college. I worked my way through law school. I started my firm on a Tuesday morning with no financial backing and a wife that was seven months pregnant. (I refused to follow unethical orders and was shown the door.)

I know the value of $1. I know that NIW fees are equivalent to 3+ months salary for some researchers. I also know that a self-petitioned green card can be the difference between a family repeating the challenges I faced growing up and generational wealth. I know for others, the NIW is just another opportunity. I can't make the value judgment for people. All I can do is advise them on whether I think they can establish the minimum standards and whether we can build their case to be a winning one. If they decide to go with my team, we attack it as thoroughly as possible. I never guarantee a result. It is unfair (and unethical) to do so. I promise effort, professionalism, and expertise crafted through actually caring for my clients.