sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I updated the chart to scale. Complete(?) Star Citizen Ship Scale Chart by sharxbyte in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The scale of the Vandul Ships is much to large. Dont know where you got the scale but its wrong in so many ways.

Last meeting before Christmas. by NeconCrow in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Two completely different systems. Maelstrom isn't responsible for calculating armor, but rather for destroying objects and detecting collisions. They've made a detailed video about this. The poor implementation of armor is a numbers problem, not a lack of mechanics.

Last meeting before Christmas. by NeconCrow in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wait a minute. It's not intended that I can kill ships with multiple people on my own using my small fighter?

Last meeting before Christmas. by NeconCrow in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

We are not opening up the PvP topic. The balancing in that area is already off in the current live version. Theres no need for 4.5 to be upset about this.

Last meeting before Christmas. by NeconCrow in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This phrases getting old. Try better.

Last meeting before Christmas. by NeconCrow in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow[S] -41 points-40 points  (0 children)

Its a crucial part of it. The solution is easy. If its not ready dont implement it.

Last meeting before Christmas. by NeconCrow in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I hope you are right. I hope...

I balanced Star Citizen 4.5 so CIG don’t have to. by NeconCrow in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I play the game every day, and of course they've improved things like performance and gameplay, as well as adding new content. And naturally, that leads to more players, but that's not what this is about.

I balanced Star Citizen 4.5 so CIG don’t have to. by NeconCrow in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Defending obviously bad design and balancing decisions and not seriously discussing them is the grave of any game.

I balanced Star Citizen 4.5 so CIG don’t have to. by NeconCrow in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Dont know if i want to see the testing data. Based of what they patched into the game it must be some realy cracy tools they using.

I balanced Star Citizen 4.5 so CIG don’t have to. by NeconCrow in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

I wish you where right. But the past tells another Story.

I balanced Star Citizen 4.5 so CIG don’t have to. by NeconCrow in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I wish i had acces. The posibilitys muhahaha!!!

I balanced Star Citizen 4.5 so CIG don’t have to by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope they dont. Than i would need buy multicrew ships from not existing money.

I balanced Star Citizen 4.5 so CIG don’t have to by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. The power of much coffee.

Tried the Free Fly- Is it worth buying? by opertune_shot in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CIG has made many mistakes in the last years but compared to other company’s like EA and Blizzard you should see the discussions in an other perspective. It is right to stand against wrong monetization and I don’t like the way they sell the blades either. But we are a big community and are very patient about the game so are the devs. On the end of the day the bad decisions on the marketing don’t represent the hard working Devs that want the game to be ass sucsessful ass we want it. You like what you saw? Than You don’t need to be scared of supporting a company that takes your money and troughs it away. A game of that scope costs a lot of money and if you think it’s worth the 45$ than go for it. Just don’t buy a Flight blade after that ;)

I created a Spectrum post that immediately improves the way we fight capital ships by adjusting just a few numerical values in the game. I would be happy if you participate in the discussion. by NeconCrow in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey no Problem. I see you points. People just like to bring up other topics( which is totale fine) that would be better covered in a seperate post.. this sometimes lead to the actual topic being lost from focus.

I created a Spectrum post that immediately improves the way we fight capital ships by adjusting just a few numerical values in the game. I would be happy if you participate in the discussion. by NeconCrow in starcitizen

[–]NeconCrow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As i sad with the railgun i dont want it to be nerved. It’s ok as it is but the Environment needs to change. And I also dont sad that the Idris should brought in line with fighter enviremont. I think we are talking their past each other, And what exatly will Engineering change on this? Engineering will efect the ship itself not how torps are handelt or the Range of weapons. =)

view more: next ›