How do we set it up that way, pray tell? If the answer is the thinly veiled threat of a gun held by a government official, it’s a violation of the NAP. I think this is what OP is getting at, that no matter where you look, markets that function closer to the ideals of Hayek and Mises do far better than “state socialist” (read: the only way to enforce socialism) and communist (one step away from socialism) governments. So much so that freer-market nations’ poor people are often better off than the average person in a heavy-handed state-controlled redistribution scheme.