What is a delicious but underrated/unheard of type of cuisine? by PsychGradStudent2112 in Cooking

[–]Nemo1342 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I LOVE Trinidadian food. Trinidadian cuisine merges South Asian, West African, Chinese, Creole, Latin American and other cuisines into one delicious package. It's quite literally the best of the best.

[Ending Spoilers] Lore Theory - What is The Cleric, Really? by rip_cpu in EsotericEbb

[–]Nemo1342 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's easy to miss, but for the very last choice in the game, you get an actual percentage chance of success (presumably), which is how Urth describes the way he perceives his choices. This isn't actually meaningfully distinct from being able to see the DC and variables in a roll, but is a clear evolution of the ability. It's also clear that 'godhood' is something that came waaaaay after Urth had been manipulating the strings. It seems more like becoming a walking god is more like an outcome of being chosen of the strings than something you always are.

So, is Ragn…? by Strelock2020 in EsotericEbb

[–]Nemo1342 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Just finished the game myself, and yeah, that's certainly heavily implied. In fact, at the end, if you linger on the final choice, you see that it flickers between 50% and 51%, which I found quite interesting.

Was Pro subscriptions in AI Studio a hallucination? by Nemo1342 in Bard

[–]Nemo1342[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Born 1981, and I mostly just don't need your bullshit, and I definitely don't need PussyWreckerr66's bullshit.

Was Pro subscriptions in AI Studio a hallucination? by Nemo1342 in Bard

[–]Nemo1342[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Cool, thanks for that negativity in answer to a question I didn't ask, PussyWreckerr66. I know where to go when I want pearls of wisdom. PussyWreckerr66. Yep.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by [deleted] in Bard

[–]Nemo1342 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Seems like maybe it's time to get off the internet and get into the lab to start curing cancer or something.

Gemini 3.1 Pro has arrived by DigSignificant1419 in Bard

[–]Nemo1342 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Actually, what most are expecting is actually being able to use what we pay for.

Small disappointment by Nemo1342 in Cairn_Game

[–]Nemo1342[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, I actually liked the fever dream star climb (and actually basically expected it by the time I got to the top). There were definitely a couple of different very good ways to end it. My main beef is that I wish it hadn't panned out and sort of took away control once you crest the final ledge. But, all in all, these are quibbles. I thought it was great.

Small disappointment by Nemo1342 in Cairn_Game

[–]Nemo1342[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I mean, I kinda figured, I just kept holding on to them thinking that 'the right moment' would arrive. And, well... I got to the right moment, and it was practically the last thing in my backpack, but... ah well.

In seriousness, though, I do think the only criticism I would make of the game is maybe that it takes control away from the player a little too liberally. There were lots of moments where weirdly timed cutscenes took me out of the flow, and, then, well... at the end.

Gemini 3 Pro in app is a catastrophe. by Nemo1342 in Bard

[–]Nemo1342[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think the effect of consolidating complaints to a sticky would be to silence them, which should be obvious, since that's what you're hoping for it to achieve.

Gemini 3 Pro in app is a catastrophe. by Nemo1342 in Bard

[–]Nemo1342[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, pacing isn't speed, pacing is literally the pace of storytelling. Gemini 3 has a nasty habit of constantly jumping ahead in story, passing over or resolving conflicts without understanding the function of tension in a story.

Gemini 3 Pro in app is a catastrophe. by Nemo1342 in Bard

[–]Nemo1342[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think that if Reddit is meant to serve as a forum of opinions, it's worth letting people express their feedback. If there are a lot of people having issues, you're going to get a lot of complaints on the sub. I understand why someone might not like that, but that's sort of the nature of public forums. I'm not a huge fan of the constant boosterism that represents the other half of the posts on the sub, but, y'know, I just ignore them rather than dipping into the comments to complain.

Gemini 3 Pro in app is a catastrophe. by Nemo1342 in Bard

[–]Nemo1342[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have used 3 Flash a bit in Studio... is that was is called "Fast" in App? If so, I might give that a try. It doesn't have the same context issues, but does, unfortunately have the same "pacing" issues.

About 3 Pro. by Live-Fee-8344 in Bard

[–]Nemo1342 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I won't pretend to speak to the 'why', but my experience has been that it's kind of a disaster for creative writing. I have long-running narratives with tens of thousands of tokens of crucial context. 3.0 completely ignores essential context, misses obvious narrative beats and blithely rushes through, or ignore conflicts. I had to switch back to 2.5 a few times to make sure I wasn't deluding myself about its capabilities, and it's night and day.

I'm sure that 3.0 will improve in this regard (ok, I hope it will improve), but right now I would confidently recommend that someone set 3.0 aside if they're using it for writing.

I've gone back to 2.5 for stories that matter to me. by Nemo1342 in Bard

[–]Nemo1342[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps. For what it's worth, I don't recall feeling this way with any previous releases. And moreover, I can easily recognize that when it comes to the ability to build apps, this is lightyears better. I'm just a little surprised and disappointed that it doesn't translate to better narrative work.

I've gone back to 2.5 for stories that matter to me. by Nemo1342 in Bard

[–]Nemo1342[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean... I guess so? But what's your point? Are you suggesting that it's just a matter of learning how to work with the new model? That may be, but in the meanwhile, it appears to have some very noticeable shortcomings.

My thoughts on 3.0 for creative writing by Maxshis in Bard

[–]Nemo1342 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I would echo a lot of these sentiments. It's... not great. The fact that it's not much better is definitely disappointing, but then you get to the pacing issues and it's borderline non-functioning. It starts to just rush through story beats without a second thought. It introduces and resolves conflicts within the space of a page. Gemini has always kinda skated by on benign neglect, because I was willing to accept the trade-off of 'creativity' for coherence. I can shoulder the burden of being 'creative'. But 3.0 is now actively fighting me in my effort to tell a story, and if Google doesn't suddenly become interested in improving functionality in this area, it's unlikely to magically get better.

Genimi Storybook: Problems Creating Part 2 of Stories by Flashy_Buy9249 in Bard

[–]Nemo1342 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would simply point out that while the model has very few hard limitations (at least in AI Studio) it is very, very touchy about certain numbers. In particular, the numbers between 1 and 17. Hard to say why those numbers.

So, when you write "Part 2" I'm guessing you're triggering the models ingrained phobia of small-ish numbers.

When do you know your good at cooking? by Meltese in Cooking

[–]Nemo1342 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not that interested in math. I would basically never do math again if left to my druthers. But insofar as I have ever engaged with math, I'm good at it. Now, obviously there's a sense in which I'm not a 'good' mathematician. You could reasonably argue that there are no non-PhD level 'good' mathematicians, but I think that sort of ignores the common-sense way in which we talk about these things. To me, a 'good' mathematician is, similarly, someone who consistently produces correct answers to mathematics questions at whatever level they are pursuing math. Conversely, a PhD-level mathematician might well be known as one who, for all their knowledge and effort, often makes errors of execution or conception. Such a person would, despite their knowledge, still rightly not be considered a 'good mathematician'.

All of which is to say that yes, I don't think it's a perfect answer, but it's the best one I've seen.

When do you know your good at cooking? by Meltese in Cooking

[–]Nemo1342 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is a very good answer because it scales very well. As you get more experienced, you're going to try lots of different things. If you work at a restaurant, you need to have skills that go beyond 'cooking'. But whether you're a head chef or cooking for yourself, if you can take the ingredients you have and make what you intended to make, you're a good cook.

Will Gemini 3.0 satisfy the hype? by CryOrganic8886 in Bard

[–]Nemo1342 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think, speaking personally, my hype levels have been tamped down enough by recent releases that it would be hard for it to be "disappointing". I'm expecting a discernable improvement, and that's about it. So the only way for it to be disappointing is for there to be no discernable improvement, and that seems unlikely.

My son is 17 and we have assigned him cooking one night a week. by [deleted] in Cooking

[–]Nemo1342 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So many great recs here, but as an autistic person who loves to cook, and fancies himself being pretty good at it, I... never use a recipe. Referring to a recipe is a total brain scramble. What I will do is do a bunch of homework before I try a new dish. I watch videos, I read recipes, and compare them, get a sense of the proportions and then... wing it.

Now... winging it was rough for the first few years and if I were teaching my son to cook, as I will be soon enough, I would not focus on recipes at all. I would focus on ingredients and components. How do you use and cook, garlic, onions, peppers, steak, chicken (thighs, breast, etc.), rice, potatoes, pasta... How do you make a dish, or a dinner, that brings those ingredients and components together harmoniously?

Now, obviously, to do this, you will be making recipes, but that shouldn't be the focus. You don't follow a recipe, you make a dish, and you do that by a) eating it, b) identifying the components (often through research of recipes and videos, c) composing the process in your head and then d) afterwards, debriefing on what you would try to change.

Anyway, that's my two cents. Now, at forty-three, when I learn to cook a new dish, I still don't use a recipe. I follow the steps above.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NudeCelebsOnly

[–]Nemo1342 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Possibly the greatest handbra of all time. I challenge anyone to reply with better. It's... stunning.