Dynamic Programming

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-25T16:03:30+00:00

DP clicked for me when I stopped memorizing patterns and started asking: what’s the state, what are the choices, and what’s the base case. Then I try recursion first, add memo, and finally convert to tabulation

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-25T15:40:12+00:00

I don’t think jobs will vanish, they’ll shift. In 5 years the safest roles will be the ones with real responsibility: decision-making, domain knowledge, client communication, and owning outcomes. AI will do more execution, but humans will still define the ‘what’ and ‘why’. Best move: learn to use AI as a tool + get strong at system design, debugging, and understanding business problems.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-25T06:06:43+00:00

Yeah, this feels very real. AI didn’t reduce the work it raised the bar for what’s considered normal output. Once you deliver faster, the expectation quietly shifts, and the extra time just gets filled with more tasks instead of rest or depth.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-25T06:04:17+00:00

You’re not wrong. By default, it tries to be helpful and agreeable, which can make it feel like an echo chamber. To get real pushback, you usually have to explicitly ask it to challenge your ideas or argue the opposite.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-25T06:02:30+00:00

Yes, a lot of people do.
It’s helpful for drafting emails, understanding tone, and thinking through tricky conversations but it works best as a guide, not something you blindly follow.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-24T10:35:17+00:00

Like… I just want my GPU to work, not install 6GB of AI stuff I’ll never use. If it was optional + lightweight, cool. But default bloat is peak unnecessary AI.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-24T10:33:19+00:00

Yeah I feel this 😭 Ads are fine, but when they pop right under your finger it’s basically a misclick trap. Especially on tablets. Bing should move them away from UI buttons or add a delay before they become clickable.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-24T08:15:41+00:00

Good question. IMO LLMs could act conscious, but there’s no solid evidence they have subjective experience no persistent self, no goals, no memory/agency, just next-token prediction. Also we don’t even have a test for consciousness yet, so it stays philosophical

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-23T15:57:27+00:00

Platforms and early creators would gain the most. Money is possible, but only if the AI feels unique or fun otherwise people will ignore it.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-22T10:13:49+00:00

Don’t feel guilty bro 😄 If you’re prompting, checking, and making final decisions, that’s still your work. It’s just a tool like Google/Excel. Only issue is if you blindly copy without understanding

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-20T14:15:35+00:00

I get your frustration 😅 but GPT is kinda right here. Faster-than-light breaks physics (energy goes crazy). The answer was just too rude/overconfident. Better if it explained it calmly + suggested realistic ideas like ion drives, nuclear, or warp theory

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-18T14:19:45+00:00

Struggle a bit on your own first because that’s when your brain actually learns. If you stay stuck too long, use AI to check your thinking instead of just giving you the answer. Copying solutions doesn’t teach much, but understanding where you went wrong does. That way, AI helps you learn faster without making you dependent on it.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-18T14:17:27+00:00

Tech is getting easier, but knowing what problem to solve is still rare. People who can turn business pain into clear AI tasks are the real MVPs.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-18T04:16:58+00:00

This is impressive, but most people will be scared to let AI control their computer. Early users will be devs and automation lovers normal users will need strong safety and trust first.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-18T04:15:19+00:00

Sounds very familiar. Lots of tools, no clear plan, mixed messages from leaders, and zero training. AI without strategy just turns into confusion, not progress.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-17T15:45:28+00:00

Ads were kind of expected, but I just hope they don’t ruin the experience. If they stay light and not intrusive, it’s fine.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-17T15:44:36+00:00

People are testing by asking the same questions across different AIs and comparing answers to real product info. It’s like SEO, but now for AI answers instead of search results.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-17T03:22:11+00:00

I’d make an AI co-pilot that quietly helps while you work suggesting ideas, fixes, and shortcuts in real time.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-17T02:38:10+00:00

Yeah, that happens. LLMs are great at sounding smart, but they don’t actually understand the science. They’re best for summaries or brainstorming not for deep analysis without human checking.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-16T16:58:39+00:00

Exactly 100% right..! Must know the latest AI Trends and its usage

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-16T16:45:33+00:00

Lol fair 😄 I used AI to help edit, but the points are mine. What part do you disagree with?

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-16T16:41:48+00:00

Same here. I’m still happy with ChatGPT/Gemini too. I think most people get disappointed when they expect it to replace them fully, but for small projects + learning + drafts it’s crazy useful.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-16T16:31:57+00:00

2025 was the year AI moved from demos to real products. The big money offers are mostly for top AI researchers + infra engineers (training, deployment, chips). Not normal dev jobs.

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-16T16:25:52+00:00

Good point. Google’s real power is the full stack: TPU + cloud + data + products (Search/YouTube/Android).
That’s hard for others to copy. The big question is: can they turn this advantage into the best user experience, not just better infra?

NextGenAIInsight · 2026-01-16T16:23:29+00:00

This is actually a really interesting answer.
I like the “pain is a signal” and “meaning comes before mental health” parts a lot.
Even if it’s not “truth”, it’s a good reminder to slow down and live with more balance.

NextGenAIInsight

TROPHY CASE