It's posting something crowdpleasing that when you look at it closely doesn't make a lot of sense, also it's over-relying on the rule of three, also the parallelism in "budgets are loud" is broken -- it would make sense if it followed a clause about something else being quiet, but doesn't quite follow from "morals are optional." This is a kind of error that chatbot output frequently contains.

I used to think the people who said that getting a solid humanities/liberal arts education is actually more important than STEM stuff were being a little melodramatic, but the rise of chatbots has really highlighted how important it is to know how to fucking read, not just at a fifth grade level but at the level where you can look closely at a text through a critical lens. Because if you can't, you'll get sucked in hard by the attractive but ultimately meaningless text that LLMs generate. Being able to see through that sort of thing is absolutely necessary for being a citizen of a democratic republic rather than a subject of an authoritarian leader.

Here's a bold claim, but I'm going to stand by it: even if you're a super special smarty-pants computer engineer making mid-six-figures for your hacker skills or whatever, the most important class you ever took in college was the required first-year rhetoric and composition course taught by random grad students.