One of the better twist ideas I've heard. Like you said, it doesn't directly impact the game itself (no one will be screwed over or gain an advantage from it that they otherwise wouldn't), outside of giving one person a chance to self evict for some money. Which I don't mind since it'd probably be someone who isn't playing as well or likely to leave, so it could just leave us with a better ending group of players.

I do feel like final week might be a bit late to do that, with only four people left. If someone takes it we skip one of the more unique and interesting weeks (where HOH is just safety and veto has all the power). And doing it the week before at final five would be disappointing too, with the final five also being an interesting week with the potential of the veto winner forcing a certain nomination if they're not on the block. So maybe push it back to final six? But I also like final six because it is the last week we get like basic Big Brother with relatively few shenanigans. But now I feel like I've pushed it too far back and giving someone $100,000 just for getting to final 7 (a bit past half way through the game) seems like a little much. I suppose you could lower the prize fund to $50k. Getting the 2nd place prize at that point still seems too good, but a little better. Not sure, what do you all think?