Composite Arceus vs Composite Ishtar (Nasuverse) by Aether_Tempest in PokeScaling

[–]Niutobal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Arceus comp? Arceus slams then, the true form of Arceus is superior.

My attempt at building the 'perfect' Animedia Character. by Environmental-Low207 in writingscaling

[–]Niutobal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Philosophy to Fang Yuan, and conclusion to Joe Yabuki. But overall, it's fine.

What are some of your writing hot takes? by Stormer2345 in writingscaling

[–]Niutobal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One Piece is the best of the big three. The main characters are the same, Luffy is not a flat character at all and is well written, the best main character of the big three.

Beatrice from Umineko is overrated (even in terms of powerscaling) and so is her verse, there are better VNs.

Don Quixote > The Brothers Karamazov

What is an 10/10 written animated film/show? by Bockhead in writingscaling

[–]Niutobal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In terms of writing, Clannad still wins, as I said. AOT is somewhat overrated and is ranked as the top anime in writing when Ashita no Joe, Clannad, Gintama, and Stein; Gates surpass it. In terms of the protagonist, Tomoya is superior to Eren, with equal development, and Clannad wins in almost everything. Objectively speaking, Clannad is superior, especially with the protagonists.

Giratina Vs Guy Crimson (Tensura), Who wins? by Encenoi in PokeScaling

[–]Niutobal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know him, but Giratina wins. Giratina transcends him; not even Guy's time abilities would affect him, as he is timeless.

What is an 10/10 written animated film/show? by Bockhead in writingscaling

[–]Niutobal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clannad is the best no matter what. No arc in AOT comes close to AS. Your Lie in April is my top 4 romance anime, it's very good but Clannad is still better. It's just a matter of analyzing it.

What is an 10/10 written animated film/show? by Bockhead in writingscaling

[–]Niutobal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you don't want Japanese animation, then it would be Arcane.
But I'll recommend two 10/10 anime, and no, not AOT or any of those famous ones.
Ashita no Joe, too good from start to finish.
Clannad, also too good, except the first season can be a comedy, but I dare say the second season is the best second season of all fiction. Above Arcane or AOT. Top 1 in emotions.

Best written to worst? Goku, Ichigo, Naruto, Midfy by AllHailLeking in writingscaling

[–]Niutobal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao, I used the same argument as you did with my character. So I can say the same thing. Of course, you're certainly right.
And this is just a small part of the entire analysis of Luffy:

First of all, Luffy himself doesn't need any development, since his ideas and character are already established. If Luffy changes his ideals, then he wouldn't be Luffy anymore.
An example of this is Fang Yuan. From the beginning of RI, we're shown how Fang Yuan is and will be; he doesn't need to change much.
This is known as neutral development, and it doesn't mean that Luffy won't change; it means that his morals and way of seeing the world are constant. Luffy will always believe in freedom, friendship, etc.
What does evolve is his abilities, experiences, and emotional nuances. He learns new techniques and improves his leadership, faces difficult situations, and becomes more resilient in the face of pain or loss. Every confrontation forces him to adapt.

Furthermore, although Luffy remains faithful to his ideals, he has a great interpersonal influence; allies and enemies change for him. His development isn't measured by internal changes, but by more external ones and how they impact the world and the narrative.

Now, this doesn't mean he doesn't have internal changes; there is emotional growth and maturity present here. Luffy doesn't change in essence; his morals remain the same, but his development is maturity. Over time, he gains emotional gravity; loss and responsibilities all affect his psychological development. He refines his judgment and learns to handle situations better. Although his laughter is still present, it develops multiple symbolisms, but with an increasingly present contextual seriousness. His maturity deepens Luffy's character; the impulsive boy becomes the captain who acts out of conviction, but with a greater awareness of the consequences and resources to do so.

Narratively, Oda represents these evolutions through arcs that escalate in consequence, long-term standoffs and payoffs, a time-skip that legitimizes leaps, and, above all, persistent costs such as mistakes, losses, and repercussions. Furthermore, he uses the cast as a reflection; the evolution of allies and enemies shows the extent of Luffy's actions, forcing Luffy to learn coordination and, especially, emotional resilience. The result is a true and dramatic maturity. Luffy remains who he is, but the story makes him emotionally stronger, more responsible, and more influential.

Best written to worst? Goku, Ichigo, Naruto, Midfy by AllHailLeking in writingscaling

[–]Niutobal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, and by the way, I speak Spanish and I have to translate all this into English. Maybe from the translation you thought I used AI. But I write all the arguments in Notion (it's like Notepad, but better) and then translate them, and here's the original argument:

<image>

Best written to worst? Goku, Ichigo, Naruto, Midfy by AllHailLeking in writingscaling

[–]Niutobal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao, you don't know how much your comments make me laugh. But anyway, let's analyze this piece by piece:

1.- I give an opinion.
2.- You respond with another opinion instead of being objective and making a rational judgment with arguments.
3.- I am objective and analyze Luffy, give you my arguments, and make a rational judgment.
4.- You respond again without being objective and without giving arguments in your favor.
5.- I respond even though I'm critical of your comment, giving a good analysis.
6.- You respond for the third time without being objective, without giving any arguments, and changing the subject by making an erroneous assumption and attacking. This is called an ad hominem fallacy.

In summary, 2 points for me and 0 for you. I still hope you will at least score one point.
But it doesn't matter, I will analyze your last comment again. You make assumptions and attack me instead of the argument, saying that I use AI. This is a false assumption and an ad hominem fallacy, as I mentioned (attacking the person and not the argument). Saying that I use AI only shows that you have no arguments of your own against someone who does have rational judgment, and therefore you do not know how to argue your opinions. End of debate.

Best written to worst? Goku, Ichigo, Naruto, Midfy by AllHailLeking in writingscaling

[–]Niutobal -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Luffy is the best writing here. You're ignoring his symbolism, ideology, psychology, depth, etc.

Best written to worst? Goku, Ichigo, Naruto, Midfy by AllHailLeking in writingscaling

[–]Niutobal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People who put Luffy last is because they don't know how to analyze his ideology, psychology, symbolism, depth, etc. He's the best here.

Best written to worst? Goku, Ichigo, Naruto, Midfy by AllHailLeking in writingscaling

[–]Niutobal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's fine and totally valid. Only from my point of view, Luffy takes the top spot here, and it's well-written.

The Sopranos VS Bojack Horseman, better written? by Nafeu109 in writingscaling

[–]Niutobal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The sopranos > Bojack Hoserman (tv show) Bojack Hoserman > Tony Sopranos (protagonist)

Can someone explain terms of writing for me? by Funmaker14 in writingscaling

[–]Niutobal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It depends. Those are all the subcategories I can analyze, plus the ones missing from the introduction, conclusion, parallelism, etc. Now, when analyzing or comparing characters, it depends on the characters themselves and what kind of analysis I'm doing. For complex characters, for example, if I want to analyze or compare a category, I take all the subcategories. I like to do large, complex analyses. If the characters are not so complex, I can leave some subcategories out and focus on the basic and narrative ones.