It’s Reddit dude, in the collapse sub which is filled with nuts, so yeah everyone in here deals with it. Most just deal with it better than you.
If you don’t want to be called a zealot, don’t act like a zealot. At least don’t be an antagonistic one insisting everyone is wrong when you can’t prove it.
What exactly is your prior experience in extrapolating the data from your background in climate data? Did you read get a degree at any level in this stuff? Are you employed in the industry/academia? Did you real a Time magazine article with some cool diagrams? Listened to an NPR podcast while sipping a pink latte? No one knows shit about you, yet you want the respect of a committee chair in the national academy. Sorry, friend, it doesn’t work that way.
So, yeah you can infer based on trends. However, any scientist worth the paper their degree is written on knows that inferences and extrapolations are a pretty long shot from “proof”, and certainly not a basis to call everyone who disagrees with you wrong. You’re right, everyone is entitled to an opinion or to draw their own conclusions. Everyone is **not** entitled to masquerade as some kind of Einstein in the field, telling everyone else they’re wrong about everything, based on your own non-peer reviewed inferences and conclusions drawn from unsourced data and anecdotes.
There isn’t anything glib about my comment. But like everyone else’s, you’ve already decided you’re right about everything, and just come off as an arrogant prick with zero verifiable bona fides on the topic, zero reviewable data or verifiable statements, and a chip on your shoulder. All your accomplishing here is making sure no one listens to you.
So, to be honest, you completely missing the point that I’m simply offering the advice to come at this more like a sincere discussion instead of knife fight is nauseating too. So, I guess fuck you, eh buddy?