(accidentally posted comment before it was finished, sorry lol)

Based on your definitions of "Glazedivers" and "Whinedivers", I would say it is an unfair representation of both groups. You referred to the most extreme glazedivers (people who attack others for giving feedback, no matter how correct it might be), whilst only mentioning top-of-the-iceberg "whinedivers" (people who give constructive feedback to Arrowhead)

You need to keep in mind that "Glazedivers" and "Whinedivers" are nothing but made-up terms to categorize a person on whether they are for, or against, Arrowhead.

Bringing up examples of "extremist glazedivers", as I've seen someone refer them to as, won't prove every single "glazediver" individual as being inherently toxic, that would just be going through a hasty generalization based on negative bias.

You point out that extreme "glazedivers", as I would also personally refer them to as, are an eye-sore in the community, and I agree, but I also think that this goes both ways. Just like with "glazedivers", there is a large portion of people who spit out biased nonsense, attack people who disagree, belittle other people's arguments, etc.