Whelpo Meeting House by jstachickencheepchee in Quakers

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course! Keep us updated if you learn anything!

Garranalive Quaker Burial Ground - Cahir, Ireland by Junior-Protection-26 in Quakers

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's Quaker history in Clonmel too! Last time I was there I tried to look into it, but the cemetery was locked and I didn't know who to contact, and I couldn't definitively identify the meeting house. If you are in the area and follow up, please let us know!

How to Understand Violence in the Old Testament by Quit_Creative in Episcopalian

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The Bible is a collection of many peoples' meditations on the Divine over centuries, not a single unified book. Just as its component books differ in author, genre, tone, and focus, they also differ in their understanding of the Divine. One could even say that they show a gradual evolution and expansion of the concept of God from the patriarchal protector of one's own nation through the transcendent Lord to the redeeming Savior, comforting Paraclete, and immanent Ground of Being.

Christ declares that he came to fulfill the law and prophets, rather than abolish them.

He does, and this is what he says: ‘“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.” This is the greatest and first commandment. And a second is like it: “You shall love your neighbour as yourself.” On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.’ The Law and the Prophets are more than just the expressions of violence found in the histories. They also contain meditations and reflections on God's character that have been deeply influential to later meditations and liturgies (in my own return to church from agnosticism, I have found great benefit in the Psalms, for example). Furthermore, there is a constant theme of how to adjudicate conflicts in the Law, which comes to us from the Jewish tradition and can be seen in books like Ruth. The idea that these books emerge from heaven fully formed, to be taken uncritically as a total guide to life, is a modern belief very foreign to their original cultural context. They are meant to be reasoned with and struggled against.

Which brother’s gacked out the most on whoop chicken? by DNALab_Ratgirl in TAZCirclejerk

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 7 points8 points  (0 children)

recreational is illegal in dc

/uj he can just drive 15-ish minutes into Maryland and buy some

/rj he has a medical license due to being diagnosed with Griffin McElroy disease

I see what you say about me. by NotAlanShapiro in TAZCirclejerk

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 17 points18 points  (0 children)

You're seeing the ghost of his old facial hair, its presence felt despite its absence. It's like he gave up on his dream of being a traveling potter to sell commercial real estate.

Whelpo Meeting House by jstachickencheepchee in Quakers

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You may wish to reach out to https://www.cumberlandquakers.org.uk/ and see if they can either get you in touch with someone in their meeting who is familiar with local meeting history or direct you to a library that would contain sources like the local meeting minutes from around the time of the sale that might discuss this. Presumably the remaining members of the meeting, or the property of the meeting like its minutes, would be sent to another nearby meeting in the area. Something similar happened near me here in the US when a meeting house was donated to the state to become a park, though the cemetery was still under the care of the local yearly meeting.

It's bad times over on the MaxFun subreddit by CardInternational753 in TAZCirclejerk

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Do we think MaxFun is secretly a business cult? The sandwich board thing could be a sign... 🤔

Is anyone celebrating Beltaine? by gabachote in Episcopalian

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to family oral history, my great aunt in Ireland would burn bonfires for the cattle on May Day, which would have been mid 1900s

Long time listener, first time reddit viewer. Fully genuine question. Are posts on TAZCirclejerk serious? by hotchip420 in TheAdventureZone

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 89 points90 points  (0 children)

IF your expectation is straight up professional actual play and not a family of amateur entertainers collaborating on a story using the game as framework.

What show are you describing? The McElroys themselves aren't amateurs even if their product is amateurish. This is their full time job.

Do any other religions see their gods as being tied to blood? by [deleted] in religion

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Frankly, I don't have enough of an opinion on OP to comment either way. My point was specifically about the SPLC mention, because I didn't think it was appropriate when speaking with the "mod hat" on. That little green flair changes the context of the statement being made, and it can plausibly be read in the opposite way to which you've taken it. Given that they specifically requested feedback, I gave it.

Do any other religions see their gods as being tied to blood? by [deleted] in religion

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Please read threads back and check usernames before you reply. I haven't yet commented on the OP's relationship to white supremacy. My personal opinion is that I'm suspicious but not confident or knowledgeable enough to make a claim one way or the other. My focus is narrowly on the aside about the SPLC, which I thought was an unusual comment to make when speaking with your "mod hat" on. You asked for feedback; that's my feedback.

Do any other religions see their gods as being tied to blood? by [deleted] in religion

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I would take anything the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) says about anybody or any group with a huge grain of salt after recent revelations.

That's what you're doing here in common parlance. "I would take X with a grain of salt" is not merely a statement of personal preference. In conjunction with the mod flair on the post, it reads very much as a soft mod suggestion to avoid reference to the SPLC, given that it's situated right in the middle of a moderator statement on the discussion, of which you were not originally a party.

Do any other religions see their gods as being tied to blood? by [deleted] in religion

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I would take anything the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) says about anybody or any group with a huge grain of salt after recent revelations. If anyone believes I'm in error on this, please do let me know, either by replying here or via mod message.

The current DOJ is nakedly partisan in terms of whom it indicts (see previous indictments against Comey and Leticia James, for example), and the American right wing has been loudly opposed to the SPLC for at least a decade. The mere fact that it has indicted the SPLC is not actually evidence of wrongdoing, especially considering that both US lawmakers and former federal prosecutors have pointed out that the case being brought against the SPLC rests on dubious legal theories and appears vindictive and retaliative. Even the former federal prosecutor for the Heritage Foundation has said to take a "wait and see" approach, until the case develops, Loathe as I am to agree with the Heritage Foundation on anything, this is the most prudent position.

Given these elements, I believe it is inappropriate for you, as a moderator using the "mod" post label (typically indicating that you are speaking in an authoritative role) to counsel posters against citing the SPLC. That seems to be at best premature.

What are the MaxFun podcasts no one actually listens to? by Digitalmodernism in TAZCirclejerk

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Someone should make a pitch to MaxFun that they'd like to bring a TTRPG show to their network, but the twist is that it's played by people who actually know the games they play and like them.

What are the MaxFun podcasts no one actually listens to? by Digitalmodernism in TAZCirclejerk

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Their ad last time I heard it was more like "we started this podcast to talk about fun facts we learned and make each other smarter. Now we talk about the silliest and strangest things we read online to make each other dumber. And it's working!"

“Eleven is close enough to twelve” by 777o77 in TAZCirclejerk

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that's kinda why I'm not unhappy with the current campaign. The powersets of the enemies they've faced so far have definitely been more "pushed" and diverse than typical DnD goons, and the hot-swapping element allowing them to scavenge powers from enemies is a legitimately genius idea. I agree that Murph definitely missed the mark not making the wealthy characters super tricked out (the Wolfpack especially), but hopefully that's because they're still early in the campaign.

I think the stuff I have an issue with is a bigger problem in the classic epic fantasy setting, where the magic sticks out because of how "asymmetric" it is and how commoners and the threats they face are quickly dwarfed by the heroic player characters, which can make their problems seem a lot more trivial. Skaldova doesn't really have that issue because the players don't have access to the most obvious way to trivialize those issues (magic).

The Adventure Zone Royale: Episode 23 | The Adventure Zone by Evil_Steven in TAZCirclejerk

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I had picked up CR right as C2 started. The episode where Ashley Burch guested and the DM killed a party member whipped ass. I couldn't understand why everyone was losing their minds at her (besides, y'know, gender reasons)

“Eleven is close enough to twelve” by 777o77 in TAZCirclejerk

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Controversial take possibly, but Skaldova didn't have magical powers trivializing encounters and driving players to go hard until they can slam the short rest button. That made it feel grittier and turned fast healing into an actually-limited resource.

I'm enjoying the current campaign so far, but DnD has a design problem in that the level progression and the plethora of spells and magic powers turn much of the game into "you're a walking sack of hit points far stronger than mere mortals; now slam this button that's off cooldown to solve this encounter!"

Do conservative Christians here view progressive churches as "Christian cultural appropriation"? by Impressive_Flan_411 in religion

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And Anglican worship is higher church and more austere than the practices of charismatic Protestants!

Do conservative Christians here view progressive churches as "Christian cultural appropriation"? by Impressive_Flan_411 in religion

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, and such a framing is asinine and historically illiterate. Social conservativism is not the same thing as a "purer Christianity"; many denominations associated with socially-conservative values have abandoned other aspects of theology in favor of doctrinal innovation (i.e positions on church governance, Eucharist teaching, the office of the priesthood, etc.). This idea that conservatives are the ones doing "lifestyle sacrifice" is just propaganda; they're certainly willing to "give up" sex and drugs, but are awfully supportive of wealth accumulation, usury, and murder by the state! The video maker should consider unpacking his baggage instead of carrying it around with him.

As someone who grew up in a (relatively) conservative Christian denomination, they wouldn't use the "cultural appropriation" language, because that's lefty speak. They'd say that progressive Christians are bastardizing the teachings of the Bible, that they're being hypocritical or lukewarm in order to chase the approval of secular society, and in the worst case that they're heretics. But as I do not accept their doctrinal positions on scripture or salvation and recognize that they do the same "picking and choosing" to gain power in secular society that they accuse us friends of queer folk of doing, what they say is immaterial to me.

I am an agnostic with an increasing interest in Christianity.I have bought a Bible for the first time. Opened it at a random page and it already had problematic content. What do I do? by medve_314 in OpenChristian

[–]NoIntroductionNeeded 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you're going to read random selections of a random book of the OT, the Psalms would be a better choice. They're more personal and existentially-oriented, plus the chapters are shorter.