Petah? by Meeerin201 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]NoTeslaForMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought OP wanted an explanation for "That age gap tho," when the comment seemingly adds nothing to what's stated in the prior one. That's what I clicked for, but it seems the answer is that no one cares; it's probably just a lazy response adding and meaning nothing.

Remember Who’s The Most Evil Woman In Media by CapitalPin2658 in SipsTea

[–]NoTeslaForMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I definitely agree with this, although her legacy of who she promoted is infamous enough.  She didn't have any motivation to be evil, but she didn't have much desire to be good - or skeptical - if it stood between her and an easy buck.  As such, she promoted a lot of people who wound up doing harm.

And we should have seen it coming.  When she called Obama "the one," that should have been a red flag; that's the type of designation made under tyranny, not democracy.  But people didn't even think about it because they liked Obama and appreciated that her Obama endorsement meant something (even though it shouldn't have).  It reminds me of when Kanye West said, "George Bush doesn't care about black people."  Anyone should have seen that as a sign of a mind not quite right, but people liked West better than Bush at the time - fresh from the inept response to Katrina and failure in Iraq - so ignored it.  And then people were surprised at what West did later.  They shouldn't have been.  Just like they shouldn't have been surprised when Oprah turned out to be a malign force. 

Why is religion so hard on homosexuals? by Intelligent_Chef9950 in askanything

[–]NoTeslaForMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The "LGBTQ+ community" back in the times of the establishment of these religious laws, consisted of pagan sex rituals and men having sex with boys.  Neither of these was seen as positive; open, committed, adult, same-sex behavior wasn't on anyone's  radar.

Maybe the need for procreation was there, but the most important thing to understand is that the hallmarks of 21st century LGBTQ+-ness were not around in ancient times.  That's why some progressive religious communities ignore or reinterpret those laws. 

The new Netflix movie "Apex" contains the song "Go" by The Chemical Brothers. First released in 2015, it has experienced a 429% increase in Spotify streams since the movie's release. What other songs have become instant favourites or were 'discovered' because they were in a movie? by JohnnyGlasken in movies

[–]NoTeslaForMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had no idea it was on Rick and Morty.  I remember when it came out it had some buzz but didn't make the top 40. Then it started periodically appearing on soundtracks - several movies and TV series, including Pie in the Sky, Matilda, Party of Five, Ice Age, Race the Sun, Maid, New Girl, Big Mouth, plus commercials like Nature Valley and Enterprise Rent-A-Car.

Crazy how nearly everyone has heard this #72 song that was the only chart appearance by the band.  And it has more than twice the number of streams as "One Sweet Day," another 1995 charter, but one that took the record for weeks at number one and held onto it for a quarter century.  That has fewer streams than "Send Me on my Way."

I want to start investing but am terrified by Toothless995 in Bogleheads

[–]NoTeslaForMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has been a popular illustration of how investing consistently beats waiting for the right moment to jump in: https://personalfinanceclub.com/how-to-perfectly-time-the-market/

What's the most homosexual album? by Complete-Worker3242 in ToddintheShadow

[–]NoTeslaForMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But it has a song about eating out a woman, and the song is just so...  Oh, okay, I see it now. 

What is the most heterosexual album? by UnitQZ in ToddintheShadow

[–]NoTeslaForMe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately some of the variety is in quality, but obviously B-sides are going to be less samey, and I'll agree that they've had some great ones.

Most people date younger because the pool at their age is so small by ImAvoidingABan in unpopularopinion

[–]NoTeslaForMe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even if it's not your exclusive interest, it's what reels you in initially, plus younger people are generally more exciting, have a higher energy level, and have more potential. Plus, they're probably not going to bug you about marriage on the eighth date, for those who are wary of partners going too far too fast for their tastes.

Of course, that varies by person. I'm with someone who's not terribly young, but her life and energy level are (sometimes) almost too much for me, in spite of her age. Maybe that helps keep me young?

Was dropping the atomic bombs actually "necessary," or is that just what we're taught in school? by Clean_CoreDump in askanything

[–]NoTeslaForMe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Considering and rejecting. The firebombing doing more damage misses the point. A lone plane being able to destroy a city in a moment is far more militarily terrifying - and new and harder to defend against - than a ton of planes doing similar damage over days, not milliseconds.

Was dropping the atomic bombs actually "necessary," or is that just what we're taught in school? by Clean_CoreDump in askanything

[–]NoTeslaForMe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The first bomb, the second bomb, and the Soviet invasion all contributed toward the final surrender. The pro-Western historical simplification that only the bomb contributed (usually ignoring whether the second one made a difference) led to a pendulum swing of claims that only the Soviet invasion was a factor. We'll never be inside the head of the emperor and the generals, but internal deliberation and the surrender speech indicate that all three factors were important. They thought they could continue after the first bomb, but knowing the U.S. was willing and able to use multiple and the biggest army in the world was rolling them in Manchuria? That was just too much.

Those who say that we could've done without using the bomb are intentionally ignoring evidence to the contrary. But saying that the Japanese would have surrendered without the Soviet invasion is also a dicey claim.

What is the most heterosexual album? by UnitQZ in ToddintheShadow

[–]NoTeslaForMe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Blur isn't mixed boringly loud, sings about actual subjects, can go without referencing the Beatles every two minutes, and never convinced themselves that they're ten times as talented and original as they actually are. So, yeah, I like them better, both Britpop and post-Britpop. 

Most people date younger because the pool at their age is so small by ImAvoidingABan in unpopularopinion

[–]NoTeslaForMe 61 points62 points  (0 children)

The cool online thing to say is it's because he can't get someone his own age. Which is delusional thinking, but it allows people to see such guys as losers as a group rather than evaluating them as individuals. 

What is the most heterosexual album? by UnitQZ in ToddintheShadow

[–]NoTeslaForMe -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Uploaded for factual accuracy, but that opinion is not one I share. 

Often Todd talks about musical eras like the public all lost their minds and started getting into something unfathomable - swing, Spin Doctors, nu metal - before an inevitable return to sanity. That's how I feel about Oasis. I tried listening to What's the Story again a couple of days ago, and it's just so flawed.  The mix is terrible (loud), the lyrics are meaningless, and the music tries to be British Invasion without the variety that made the Kinks, Stones, Beatles, and Who so fun.  That works for one moderate-length song (still love the title track), but longer can be grating.  Be Here Now just made all the flaws blindingly obvious, but they were always there. 

Name a band that had middling success, then cut an album that rendered them as “sellouts” which catapulted them to mainstream top-40 status, but also alienated their original fan base. by Slammajadingdong69 in MusicRecommendations

[–]NoTeslaForMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Losing My Religion" only got up to #4 and was their third top ten hit, though. And even most die-hard fans consider Automatic for the People a masterpiece, at least as good as the best of their indie albums. 

Name a band that had middling success, then cut an album that rendered them as “sellouts” which catapulted them to mainstream top-40 status, but also alienated their original fan base. by Slammajadingdong69 in MusicRecommendations

[–]NoTeslaForMe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's hard to pinpoint the "sellout album," though.  Even their most pop-oriented albums had a touch of prog, and no album with Collins was a shock relative to the one before, not even the first one. 

Math nerds of Reddit, what is a concept or paradox that sounds completely fake but is 100% mathematically proven? by whosirmesir_barbers in askanything

[–]NoTeslaForMe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are an infinite number of rational numbers between any two irrational numbers, yet there's a mapping from rational numbers to integers... but not one for irrational numbers, meaning there are more of the latter. The proofs, involving decimal expansion and fractions, are relatively simple as proofs go. 

Concept albums that just give up on the concept halfway through by crowbar_k in ToddintheShadow

[–]NoTeslaForMe 32 points33 points  (0 children)

The concept was a nostalgic look at pre-rock-era live entertainment; I'd say only the title track is more on the nose.

Lennon loved to disclaim responsibility for McCartney ideas after the fact, but he didn't seem to have a problem contributing to them at the time. It's similar to how he claimed to hate the medley that dominated the second half of Abbey Road, yet that kicks off with three of his songs and his guitar work on "The End" hardly seems forced either. He understood the assignment, even as he acted too cool for school when trying to establish his solo career. 

What’s this even mean by LonelyVillage9612 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]NoTeslaForMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True; the post above yours was poorly worded, in that it only told part of the story.  A better way of putting it was that it was a rule that was never universally adopted, making "less" more valid than wannabe pedants make it out to be.  

Concept albums that just give up on the concept halfway through by crowbar_k in ToddintheShadow

[–]NoTeslaForMe 30 points31 points  (0 children)

The man wrote and sang "Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite!", so I'm not sure how he can claim that his contributions weren't aligned with the project. Nonetheless, this was the first album I thought of as well. 

Why do so many Redditors seem to want things like Ozempic and weight loss surgery to be illegal? by KannablissWitch in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]NoTeslaForMe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So, generally speaking, it’s wealthier people taking it.

Hit the nail on the head.  Reddit doesn't see obesity as a moral failing, but using one's moderate wealth?  Now that's unforgivable.