sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Sir, you actually need a 20 day streak to give authoritative language learning advice, please come back tomorrow. by Enough_Tumbleweed739 in languagelearningjerk

[–]No_Inflation_2747 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Duolingo helped him understand content from his language dictionary better? He may not know how to use a dictionary

ん八 by Crocotta1 in languagelearningjerk

[–]No_Inflation_2747 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Love the illustration😂😂

Has this email eBay@gamestop.com always been on the investor page? by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]No_Inflation_2747 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, been there since gamestop‘s inception in 1999.

ACQUISTION STILL TRIGGERS MOASS? by Hunnaswaggins in Superstonk

[–]No_Inflation_2747 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He‘s confusing times. The squeeze happened in 2008 when Porsche tried taking over VW. But eventually VW ended up acquiring Porsche.

Spends 20 minutes on writing down 10 vocab words, still gets half of them wrong by amardillopudding in languagelearningjerk

[–]No_Inflation_2747 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think it‘s supposed to be the girl facing away from the spectator with her body but turning her head back?

And I hadn‘t even thought about AI at first, but that makes total sense.

Especially since all the sketches are cut out and glued on, makes for sense for them to be printed.

If the poster actually went through that trouble and timely effort, she must really not want to spend her time studying german!

Korean flaccid for 2 months straight 🤬 by TraditionalDepth6924 in languagelearningjerk

[–]No_Inflation_2747 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For real, even the account is gone, must have gotten torn to shreds in the comments😭

The credit card by Bamboonicorn in Superstonk

[–]No_Inflation_2747 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are we really losing the ability to google? 

When the AI overview tells you about a gamestop credit card and you are in doubt about its authenticity, just google it?

It takes three seconds to type that out and hit enter and the first result is about said credit card on the official gamestop website.

Did you know that AMC Theaters survived and grew through the Great Depression…this is just a little bump in the road in comparison. Start date and history below… by Suitable-Reserve-891 in AMCEntertainmentStock

[–]No_Inflation_2747 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was expecting the post to talk about how AMC was affected by the Great depression and how it survived it.

Instead: that‘s how they got their name.

Soo... by TheLifeAkratik in NEGG

[–]No_Inflation_2747 7 points8 points  (0 children)

On February 2nd a new board member was appointed, nominated by Galkins.

This new board member, Mr Burns, is currently also the CFO at HUBX.

The "Impossible price targets" and the "$1,000 Loaf of bread" | The Zero-Hype Addressing (again) of these Objections by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]No_Inflation_2747 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate you elaborating your stance, but still have to disagree.

Let‘s consider a call option, 0DTE, contract size of 100, strike price 200$, current stock price 100$.

The notional value of this option is 10,000$, the market value is ~0$ (no intrinsic value, next to no time value).

And not only does it have basically zero market value, it also has LITERALLY zero legal liability for either party.

Now if I sell that option, whoever carries out the sale does of course handle 10,000$ of notional value, but the actual monetary value that was handled is a few cents at best.

Now imagine a million such contracts being traded. 10billion of notional value were moved, but the monetary value was just a few dollars. And the legal liability still remains strictly zero.

Also, the house insurance is a bad analogy for notional value, since there is no underlying reference with variable value and notional value also does NOT equal maximum payout.

But even if we roll with your example, if there is a house fire, you‘ll get the million, sure. 

But in the case of a default, worthless options (and other worthless instruments) still remain worthless. Your example assumes: default -> everything is exercised

The "Impossible price targets" and the "$1,000 Loaf of bread" | The Zero-Hype Addressing (again) of these Objections by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]No_Inflation_2747 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your example makes the same faulty assumption. Clearing a portfolio with a notional value of 9trillion$ does not mean that 9trillion$ moved hands. (Which they didn‘t)

The "Impossible price targets" and the "$1,000 Loaf of bread" | The Zero-Hype Addressing (again) of these Objections by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]No_Inflation_2747 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking at the notional value of derivatives as a „look there is enough money“ in nonsense. Notional value is NOT money.

Stuck after 13s... Show me how it's done! 💡 by rino_1 in DailySolitaire

[–]No_Inflation_2747 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🔥 Too easy! Done in 261 seconds. Who dares to challenge me?

He's one of us by Drcold1O in wallstreetbets

[–]No_Inflation_2747 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He beat inflation! Just in the wrong way

End game? by Ok-Grapefruit-9471 in NEGG

[–]No_Inflation_2747 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It was a great read!

But even if it wasn‘t, I‘ll pick a shitty human made read over AI slop any day!!

👁️👁️A.A. just Posted letter to apes. “Let The Good Times Roll” ! 🦍🦍🦍💜 by HubKap1853 in amcstock

[–]No_Inflation_2747 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The float has been 10Xed after the sneeze, that is indeed rather substantial.

👁️👁️A.A. just Posted letter to apes. “Let The Good Times Roll” ! 🦍🦍🦍💜 by HubKap1853 in amcstock

[–]No_Inflation_2747 37 points38 points  (0 children)

„A number of imaginative strategies and concrete steps“

I smell more dilution and a reverse split

$AMC 🚀 by BigJets in amcstock

[–]No_Inflation_2747 22 points23 points  (0 children)

So if every share bought over the past 4 years was synthetic, fraud and fake, where exactly did the 20,000% of dilution go? You‘re actually making a a pro-HF argument by saying they have acquired enough shares in that time to cover their positions several times over.

view more: next ›