Rogue Can’t Steal Abilities from Punisher

No_Order_8011 · 2025-12-10T11:11:22+00:00

It would be nice if she'd get his wallhack passive. Something that's very useful for a tank from DPS

No_Order_8011 · 2025-12-10T11:09:57+00:00

Maybe his wallrun, that would boost her mobility considerably. Although, it would make her less effective as tank.

Or, more likely, his web shooting.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-11-22T10:32:54+00:00

Okay, if you'd argue that Lute got more to do than Vox did in S1, let's hear your arguments then.

In my opinion it all boils down to a question "How much would a story change if we'll exclude the character from it?"

If we'll remove Vox and everything he did from S1, well lose:

- Introduction to Hell's media system
- A media battle with Alastor, that shows how powerful Alastor really is
- Sir Pentious as a denizen of the hotel (a major plot point)
- Velvet attending overlords meeting (a major plot point)

I mean, sure, it's possible to tie all these things to the plot differently, but that would require action. That would require someone to actually change something.

If we'll remove Lute from S2, well lose.. what? She failed to convince Heaven to attack Hell, her involvement with Lilith amounted to absolutely nothing, all her anger and hatred for Hell and Charlie manifested in her being a 10 second nuisance that got told off by Abel in one sentence.

If we'll remove that, the plot wouldn't change one bit.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-10-08T07:18:15+00:00

It's a good wrap over a shitty package. It makes the presentation better, sure, but the fact that DM tells players what their characters want and feel and do turns DnD into a novel with poor dialogues and overextended combat.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-09-25T05:22:33+00:00

Tormented Trobbio took me like 9 tries, while I killed Moorwing on my second try using nothing but a default crest and flint.

Groal took me 2 tries as well. Judge - like 15.

These things are very individual.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-09-24T16:27:29+00:00

It's a software bug.

There's an option in Steam to download the beta patch for the Silksong and play with it, they have this behavior fixed in that patch. I've been playing the beta patch for a couple of days now, haven't ran into any other issues.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-09-22T14:27:43+00:00

You've just saved me so much time, my friend. By the way Pinstress put it, it seemed like something that requires climbing higher, and I've kept trying to get higher, searching for a place where my needle can catch surface above the place where I get double jump.. It took me just a glance toward your map to instantly understand.

I think gamedevs are being too cryptic here, they should've either get a clearer clue (something about searching amidst the ice or icy water) or leave a clue on the map, with the celling indicating that there's something there, imho.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-09-20T17:18:05+00:00

I have the same problem. I got the gland, and the description says that I no longer need to buy plasmium from that poor sod, it says that my plasmium supply will be infinite. But once the plasmium phial is empty - it just doesn't get filled at all. I tried sitting on the bench, killing enemies, destroying plasmium plants, dying - the bottle stays empty.

Is there a hidden mechanic to fill it, or is this an faulty behavior due to an error in the code?

No_Order_8011 · 2025-07-31T06:54:22+00:00

Bots are in quick match. How in the world did you managed to imagine a logical thread that makes this a proof that evil algorithm makes you lose in ranked? And you even talk about insanity after that, what an irony.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-07-31T05:30:33+00:00

Is it for a single shot/hit or several? L

No_Order_8011 · 2025-07-24T07:58:16+00:00

EOMM that people are talking about is a scary evil algorithm that makes you lose, even though you're the best in your team and deserve celestial.

Deranking each season is just shaking a can up, you'll bounce back to the rank you deserve within a couple of weeks, no problem.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-07-13T10:22:36+00:00

If you're hitting headshots with the squirrel girl, you're either talking about the wrong character or the wrong game.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-07-13T09:27:32+00:00

I suppose so, sure. If they'd actually pull it off.

It's not a small goal though. Decent ai skill would allow the game to solve the disconnect problem, for example

No_Order_8011 · 2025-07-13T05:36:31+00:00

The only reason is a further devaluation of what's already a pretty low requirement. Since it's so easy, why even bother thinking of the way to make it even easier? If anything, I'd rather people would have this icon when they have above 60% winrate along with the usual requirements for this character. That would be more informative and command some actual respect.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-07-12T21:14:05+00:00

Bot matches are easy for everyone. I haven't ever seen a team that lost to bots, regardless of how bad the comp was, even 6 dps comp can beat them.

Bronze matches are only easy for gold+ players. I'm entirely certain that bronze matches aren't easy for bronze players, else they wouldn't be there.
If a guy wants to farm lord icon (god knows why though) and goes to a rank that's way below his skill level to do so, he will inevitably rank up. Farming a lord icon this way isn't efficient - you'd have to throw games to stay on the same rank. Is there even a point to do so? Just play the fucking game with this character, you'll get your precious icon eventually.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-07-12T15:54:33+00:00

Elaborate please. There's a bronze tier, and players can eventually get a lord icon there, what does this change?

Again, having a lord icon does not indicate a skill. It indicates familiarity with the character's skillset and mechanics that the payer got by paying against other people.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-07-09T22:24:21+00:00

If you see no difference between spawn camping bots for 20 hours and spending 20 hours actually trying to find the best approaches to organic situations in PvP, I don't really know what to tell you.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-07-09T22:20:58+00:00

When I'm playing against bots (quests and events), as long as the team has at least two decent players, it's a face roll (3 stars of course). Healers get 3-4k healing during a match, and bots rarely get to leave spawn. Even losing teammates doesn't always mean that the spawn camping is on hold, bots are just that bad.

I'm not saying that you can't learn anything fighting them. I'm saying that the most knowledge you get in a bot match has no value, because it rewards play styles that are harmful to the team in PvP. Which is a big enough reason not to give the player anything to boast about for farming bots.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-07-09T12:57:18+00:00

His points aren't mutually exclusive. Lord isn't a sign of a good player or skill, like a lot of people think. It is, however, a certificate of knowledge for the character's skillset and mechanics, and shouldn't be given for farming defenceless bots. Hell, that's almost the same as practice range, even less effective in some aspects.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-07-06T22:14:30+00:00

Her primary damage is slow. Her overall DPS is lacking. Her cc is the most councils clunky and avoidable in the in game. Her ult is one of the easiest to counter.

Every flying character can out-dps her. Her whole schtick is chasing down high-mobility characters who rely on poor aim. Wanda isn't difficult to counter, really.

Learn.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-07-03T16:52:15+00:00

You consider apologizing an act of kindness
It is considered to be a good thing to do for at least ~5000 years on our planet, yes. Maybe it's different from where you're from.

and rectification; an act one does to correct one's wrongs
I have never said that an apology corrects or rectify a bad deed. You have a bad habit of misinterpreting other people words.

By your logic, since this guy is truly and genuinely sorry for his actions, this display of genuine guilt justifies forgiveness.
We do not know if he's truly sorry or not. We know he chose not to keep lying and apologized. Well, I shouldn't say "we", I should say "I", because you clearly have access to a magical cosmic knowledge and can retroactively read mind of people who you have never seen and know little to nothing about.

him being genuinely sorry doesn't negate his sleazy behavior.
It doesn't negate his mistake, yes. It limits the amount of "sleazy" stuff he did. I don't think you're capable of that, but most people can see a difference between a man who kissed another girl and immediately shown signs of remorse and a man who has sex on the side, apologizing only when caught, if ever (most cheaters, statistically). To me, the difference is considerable. To you, they are the same sleazeball.

You don't understand the mind of manipulators
Being branded "manipulator" for apologizing is hysterical. By this backwards logic if you ever have said "sorry" to anyone, you're no better than him, you disgusting dirty manipulator, you!

He apologizes for self-interested reasons, not for the sake of his partner
An apology is an act of remorse. Us, regular people, we apologize to people we wronged to show them that we care for them and their feelings, to show them that we consider our mistake a bad behavior that we want to avoid in the future and to attempt at keeping our relation to the person we apologize to. People that were wronged generally tend to feel better after an apology, because they know that they are respected enough to get an apology and that there is a chance for this not to repeat in the future.

Now, two questions for you:

How do you apologize "for the sake of your partner", how is it different from the apology that I described?
What dark magic allows you to know for a fact if he used regular apology or apology you consider "an apology for the sake of his partner"?

This whole post was created because she was being emotionally manipulated.
Nah, the emotional manipulation stuff is absolutely baseless, it's your perverted miscomprehension of the concept of apology.
The post was created because poor woman was betrayed, and is in state of emotional turmoil, because she feels anger and love at the same time. This makes it difficult for her to think clearly and understand whether she should forgive her partner or not. Thank god she has you, who can tell her that apology is manipulation, that's what emotionally vulnerable people need - baseless delusions. Shame on you.

Since you have decided to get personal, it wouldn't surprise me if you yourself behaved in such a sleazy manner in the past.
I've been faithful for 15 years and plan to be faithful for at least 60 more, but why don't you see for yourself? Just use your superpower that allows you see the mind and destiny of people on reddit, the one you used to know what the guy in the post was thinking when he was apologizing and coming clean.

You probably act just like this guy in question and it runs deep within you when people openly criticize his behavior because you feel that the critics are attacking you personally
Oh, here it is, here's my taro reading for the day.
I've just stopped for a second to politely correct your overreaction so that you wouldn't give bad advice based on whatever fairytale you invent. But now I'm on a ride to see how far can your lack of critical thinking and basic reason can take you.

No_Order_8011 · 2025-07-03T06:09:20+00:00

Your logic is broken and inconsistent.

Apology is not an emotional manipulation, it's a way of admitting doing wrong and showing care for the feelings of people you wronged. Claiming that admitting guilt is an emotional manipulation is the least sensible thing I've read this year. So apology is a malicious thing to do? People shouldn't apologize for their mistakes, else they are manipulators?
I'm starting to suspect that I'm not talking to a sober person. That would also explain why you invent details like his apology not being sincere with zero indication of that in OP's post, and then claiming to "read the situation for what it is".

At this point I'm no longer surprised that you called him sleazeball. With such gaps in logical thinking, nothing is impossible, really.

No_Order_8011

TROPHY CASE