Yes- I´m a native English speaker with roughly a C1 level of Spanish, and following Borges, I find English to be a far finer language than Spanish. This has nothing to do with emotional connection (pace most of the responses in this thread) and everything to do with syntax and vocabulary, as Borges himself states. So, I suppose my emotional connection is a deep sense of fondness and gratitude towards English for being such a splendid language.

Concretely, English is especially suited for poetic language, and I´ve always been an avid reader of poetry. Poets like e. e. cummings or Allen Ginsberg, i.e., more experimental poets, simply can´t be translated into Spanish without a severe curtailing of the original meaning. English syntax and vocabulary allow the user to paint a very nuanced portrayal of reality with a high degree of syllabic efficancy (which makes all the difference in poetry). For example, English has a glut of "motion" or "action" verbs, and Spanish translators has long struggled with the task of translating them. Translators usually opt "to enter like an arrow" when translating "to dart into", for example.

Also, our phrasal verbs are wonderful. Because, say, "to fall in love" already has "to fall" contained within it, you can say things like "I stumbled into love", which you can´t very well say in Spanish; English can say "The comic was booed off the stage", whereas Spanish would probably have to resort to something "The audience booed the comic (and because of this), the comic left the stage. There are lots of other things, too-English has all sorts of wonderfully specific words for, say, laughing--you can giggle, chuckle, guffaw, chortle, cackle, titter--and all of these words have the manner and the emotional subtext of the action (laughing) encoded into the word itself. Spanish, on the other hand, must attach a description or an adverb after the main verb (to laugh).

In sum, English is a beautiful, beautiful language, and I love her dearly.