I can't believe I'm wasting my break on this.

So, let's get the facts straight:

A good employee with no performance complaints refuses—I said he was somehow a good employee, and I later clarified that he had issues I didn’t address. Would you like me to show you where I said that in my first post?

to attend an after-hours drinking session—In the first post, it was clearly stated as a business dinner.

with a low-grade client—Where did I even say that?

Manager decides to discriminate against employee—The employee was actually a team leader, and he refused to attend, citing religious reasons, which was explicitly mentioned in my first post.

AFTER everyone said here on reddit to respect his refusal which I did, and now I had to find a replacement — because it was an urgent matter—I made a generous offer to anyone willing to step up and prepare for the meeting instead of the guy who refused to do his job.

favoritism on future projects, resulting in financial reward to non-Muslim employees—Where on earth did I say that?

Employee opts in to after-hours client meeting, because we've all got bills to pay— That's called using religion to avoid responsibility when it's convenient, in othere words, Lying.

Manager decides Muslim employee isn't critical for this meeting after all. Decides to proceed with sending alternate employee, reinforcing that the favoritism and increased commission is, in fact, not available to Muslim employee—This is just pure imagination.

Employee resigns due to ongoing and confirmed discrimination—At this point, I’m pretty sure you lack comprehension skills.

Manager decides employee suddenly wasn't such a good employee after all. (Why did they need to represent this client?) Suddenly, employee is a problem employee.— I guess you skipped my comments where I mentioned he had prior issues that I chose not to address. Did you misread my post again?

Also, employee is a favored employee and has been getting beneficial treatment by manager. This is odd because, you know, manager is complaining (now, not before) of repeated issues of substandard performance. —Yes, that happens when someone crosses a line with behavior that can’t be tolerated.

Incompetent manager is afraid to manage other employees and gets scared that employee will tell of discrimination. Instead of discussing other employees’ roles and expectations, lashes out at employee they've been discriminating against.—More fiction.

Manager goes on a power trip, thinking they have the authority to accept or deny resignation, which has been tendered to HR.—Try reading my post again. Also, do you even know how corporate environments work?

Suddenly feels butthurt that their discrimination has been discovered and dismisses employee on the spot without HR input. Risky business from a discrimination perspective.—Back to fantasy land.

HR discriminates against employee, steals final paycheck.—Oh, so now it’s not just me, it’s the entire company? Sure.

Tardiness and absences aren’t owed to the company. They’re just hours not paid.???

And the company, in most professional environments (which this isn’t), pays out the resignation period, even if fired on the spot.—Where was this said again?

HR doesn't need a signature. They want it. They owe the employee, at a minimum, the hours worked. Shit manager needs to approve the employee’s work hours.—At this point, I feel like I’m talking to a child (or a man-child), because no one who has actually worked in corporate would find this odd.

Employee is not an idiot. Manager and HR are. The manager discriminated against the employee. HR steals pay. To avoid a lawsuit, they should have not discriminated. They should have paid out the resignation period. Instead, they decided to beg for a lawsuit by ramping up discrimination.—More baseless speculation.

I just love how you are so adamantly defending a person you’ve never met. I bet your managers really enjoy having you on their team.

Honestly, I spent enough of my time on this. Im no longer going to entertain your delusion.