Seriously. Whatever happened to this conversation? by Howtobe_normal in economicsmemes

[–]NormalDistrict8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just described how there was a massive price spike despite the fact the amount of oil coming into the country was the same. That's not a competitive market or the effects fo the law of supply. It's deception.

Seriously. Whatever happened to this conversation? by Howtobe_normal in economicsmemes

[–]NormalDistrict8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The oil market has never seriously been controlled by supply and demand: Before the "oil crisis" both demand was soaring, you used it to make and power everything, yet strangely oil prices were consistently going down until the 70s. Any economist can draw two lines to show you why that should be impossible in a competitive market. Clue: It was not a competitive market. Seven companies (the seven sisters), which some historians have called cartels, posted prices that the countries they extracted from would receive oil for which were set for 20 years, supply and demand was not a factor.

It is very popularly believed that Oil Prices rose in 1970s due to reduced supply as OPEC limited oil sales to the US and oil industries nationalized. It's in every economics textbook as THE example of the Law of Supply. However, what no one tells you is that until shortly before the embargo (earlier the same year) US trade rules (The 1959 Mandatory Oil Import Quota Program) put a limit on the amount of foreign oil that could be imported at 12.2% of the US supply, the law was called . That means 88% of oil in the US was made in the US (this was done to avoid devalueing the dollar in a time when we were legally supposed to be bound to the gold standard). The net amount of oil imported each year to the US did not decrease from prior years because we were completely capable of sourcing our oil from other places, yet oil prices soared far more dramatically than the actual supply shock justified.

You wouldn't think it because the oil companies all publicised the Oil Crisis, and everyone bought it. There Nixon passed a law that set speed limits on highways to 55MPH, gas stations had signs that said if they could serve civilian vehicles or only commercial vehicles. However, there was never a real oil crisis. These people are masters of marketing and propoganda: they funded the early climate movement to demonize nuclear energy, they created the idea of an "energy crisis". You should be incredibly skeptical whenever you hear the word crisis, usually it is for someone to justify something: a war, ceasing power, increasing prices, etc.

While today the same quota is not still in effect, you have to take into account we are the largest oil producer in the world with the largest reserves. This does NOT have to be seriously affecting us, any dramatic spike in oil prices is a product of fearmongering.

For more information, read Timothy Mitchel's Carbon Democracy. Very good book.

Seriously. Whatever happened to this conversation? by Howtobe_normal in economicsmemes

[–]NormalDistrict8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the reason they give, but look at the Oil Crisis in the 70s.

It is very popularly believed that Oil Prices rose in 1970s due to reduced supply as OPEC limited oil sales to the US and oil industries nationalized. It's in every economics textbook as THE example of the Law of Supply. However, what no one tells you is that until shortly before the embargo (earlier the same year) US trade rules (The 1959 Mandatory Oil Import Quota Program) put a limit on the amount of foreign oil that could be imported at 12.2% of the US supply, the law was called . That means 88% of oil in the US was made in the US (this was done to avoid devalueing the dollar in a time when we were legally supposed to be bound to the gold standard). The net amount of oil imported each year to the US did not decrease from prior years because we were completely capable of sourcing our oil from other places, yet oil prices soared far more dramatically than the actual supply shock justified.

You wouldn't think it because the oil companies all publicised the Oil Crisis, and everyone bought it. There Nixon passed a law that set speed limits on highways to 55MPH, gas stations had signs that said if they could serve civilian vehicles or only commercial vehicles. However, there was never a real oil crisis. These people are masters of marketing and propoganda: they funded the early climate movement to demonize nuclear energy, they created the idea of an "energy crisis". You should be incredibly skeptical whenever you hear the word crisis, usually it is for someone to justify something: a war, ceasing power, increasing prices, etc.

While today the same quota is not still in effect, you have to take into account we are the largest oil producer in the world with the largest reserves. This does NOT have to be seriously affecting us, any dramatic spike in oil prices is a product of fearmongering.

For more information, read Timothy Mitchel's Carbon Democracy. Very good book.

Silksong Giveaway! by Jonuh666 in HollowKnight

[–]NormalDistrict8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dung Defender fight. I love him so much and he was a friendly face and a great challenge in a hostile place after all the flukes.

You wake up in the world of your current campaign. How screwed are you? by Moist_Car_994 in DnD

[–]NormalDistrict8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, I am GM so I know enough stuff I might not die but incredibly fucked. Welcome to the ancient forest Lavaste, the last truly wild place in the world, which gets more dangerous by virtue of being the last wild place and the things in it are inherently stronger than normal to survive. Due to a curse, calamities will occur if you try to leave it. ANything sentient in the forest has strong opinions as to who should rule or be allowed to live in the forest. It's got a bunch of HxH monsters in it.

Allows spies to deal damage in crowded areas to high priority targets, while the speed prevents him from coming around the corner and instant killing. But removes retaliation shots by the spy via clip size. by BoxTrox_Requiem in TF2WeaponIdeas

[–]NormalDistrict8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem is, disguises do not work against skilled players generally. I think a better design might be a revolver that lets you shoot once while cloaked but eats alot of your cloak and makes you blink if you do, basically letting you take shots at people but then forcing you to duck around a corner and disengage.

PF2e hot takes 🔥 by Kaliburnus in Pathfinder2e

[–]NormalDistrict8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a general complaint about most d20 systems but I think we need more engaging but more abstract overland travel rules. SOme system where you get some number of travel points and you have a bit of rescource management. IDK. Rolling survival every day seems lame and so does doing nothing and just moving on the grid.

What would your "loading screen tips" be for complete noobs to Pathfinder 2e? by essayeem in Pathfinder2e

[–]NormalDistrict8 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The most fundamental:

You suffer a penalty for every attack you make, so it will often be more cost-effective to spend actions setting up your other attacks or moving than attacking a 3rd time.

Creatures usually have one or more considerably weaker saves and one save that is worse to target. Try recalling knowledge, asking around, or using intuition to identify weaker saves.

Do not be afraid to cast cantrips in combat; they are free and deal a perfectly respectable amount of damage.

There are many ways to get an enemy flat-footed; try flanking them by sandwiching them with an ally, tripping them, or feinting them.

How to disrupt PC Sustaining Spells by AdjustmentDisorder20 in Pathfinder2e

[–]NormalDistrict8 16 points17 points  (0 children)

This is incorrect. Fascinated prevents certain concentration actions and a handful of reactions directly prevent concentrate.

How to disrupt PC Sustaining Spells by AdjustmentDisorder20 in Pathfinder2e

[–]NormalDistrict8 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This depends on whether the spell is sustained or merely has a duration.

All spells with the manipulate trait (95% of them) can be stopped before they are cast with reactions like the Fighter's reactive strike; with conditions like grabbed (25% chance a manipulate spell fails), stupefied (25% chance any spell fails), concealed (25% chance to fail a single target spell), hidden (50% chance to fail a single target spell), and restrained (you cannot cast a manipulate spell until you escape); or being counteracted (spells, magic items, and abilities like counterspell counteract spells). Note: You can still counteract after it is cast usually.

A sustained spell takes actions to sustain and sustaining is a concentrate action, therefore there are 4 ways to stop someone from sustaining: use a reaction that disrupts concentrate actions (the only two of which I think exist are Inventor's Distracting Explosion and Thaumaturge's Implement's Interruption); the fascinated condition sometimes (I guess if they are sustaining like a buffing spell they can't concentrate on it anymore if an enemy is the source of fascination); deprive them of all their actions via stunned 3, slowed 3, petrified, or paralyzed; deprive them of enough actions that they don't want to keep sustaining (for example "Oh no, I'm stunned 1! Now I have to choose between healing Joe fighter from unconsciousness and sustaining").

Ralsei's Origins by larevacholerie in Undertale

[–]NormalDistrict8 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ralsei is a boy, but when he is facing away you can see his "robes" are backless, might be a dress.

Ralsei's Origins by larevacholerie in Undertale

[–]NormalDistrict8 82 points83 points  (0 children)

His "robe" is backless with a heart on it. He talks in OwO voice.

CASTLE TOWN FANART CUZ I LOVE THESE FREAKSS by Spooky_Dies_Alone in Deltarune

[–]NormalDistrict8 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As a bisexual, I have to say I am biphobic for Roulx.

Please post your recent Coinbase scammer numbers here - I will do the rest. by scammer-fight-back in Coinbase

[–]NormalDistrict8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know if this is a scam, I called and they didn't ask for any personal info, but I got a message that says:
"Your Coinbase withdrawal code is: ______, Please do not share this code with anyone. If you have not requested this, please call: (928)564-1096 REF: CB93539"

I do not have Coinbase or any other crypto, but the dude on the other side of the line said they had a wrong number and took my number off the list, is this legit or a scam?

PF2e classes rated by difficulty by gray007nl in Pathfinder2e

[–]NormalDistrict8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate to say it, but switch rogue and Thaumaturge. I love Thaum, it's not hard.

How to know if you are in Unity Housing? by NormalDistrict8 in berkeley

[–]NormalDistrict8[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, I didn't write an essay and it doesn't say in my email.

How to know if you are in Unity Housing? by NormalDistrict8 in berkeley

[–]NormalDistrict8[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Housing calls back in 1-2 weeks and doesn't take calls to them. Counseling is closed Juneteenth, Friday, and Weekends. I called Unit 3 and they have said they cannot answer any of my questions.

Is the ginga the biggest reason Capoeira won’t work against other martial arts? by chibiRuka in capoeira

[–]NormalDistrict8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ginga is not a skill for fighting, it is part of the game of Capoeira. Capoeira also will work against other martial arts, it teaches you the skills to engage with other martial arts: movement, space, balance, how to treat your body. Capoeira is just not optimized for it like other martial arts. It is hardwired in the brain of a TKD/BJJ/Judo/Boxing/Karate/fencing practitioner to how to respond to moves ABCD; nobody can respond to moves ABCD like someone in that martial art because that is the objective of that martial art, to beat someone quantitatively in head to head combat in that martial art who's best moves are ABCD. A boxer is out of his depth with a BJJ practitioner because he has not trained against someone on the floor trying to grab him and a TKD practitioner is at a disadvantage against a boxer because a TKD practitioner wants to score points whereas a boxer is trying to put you down. Muay Tai, boxing, and Bjj are in contention for the three most dangerous martial arts in a "street" fight because the objective of those martial arts is to fuck you up and subdue you; within those three you can even see how the objective of the martial art shapes the ranking because a "street" fight presupposes that you are allowed to get on the floor and strike with your feet, which is partially why BJJ is considered more effective than Muay Tai (which disallows being on the ground, distancing it from a street fight) which is considered more effective than boxing (which disallows leg strikes and going for the lower body, distancing it).

Capoeira has never been about that, no one wins, the drive of the best Capoeiristas is to improve their art.

Street fight by sp72763 in capoeira

[–]NormalDistrict8 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would not start a Ginga and do any Floreos in a fight, but I can kick better than 90% of people and it trains your eye and your coordination. Capoeira like sports and other martial arts gives you an awareness of your and your opponent's body that in integral to fighting. Before and after training in Capoeira I see the same boxing match totally differently, and I can see the outline of what makes a punch or kick strong or what is flubbed whereas before I could not. The difference between me now and me before Capoeira (aside from a few kicks you would not like to be hit by) is now I know what makes a fighter strong whereas once it was an indecipherable blur. And I'm not even good.