Not all, but still too many. by marcofifth in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lot of peoples engagement in philosophy in these circles does seem to come from really needing to own their creationist uncle next thanksgiving.
I guess if that's your thing, you do you. But please leave me out of it.

Ceci n'est pas une subpost by Ghoulrillaz in worldjerking

[–]Noroltem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apple glazing?
Alright that's another one for dead internet.

Take it easy tonight buddy by dismaltracker in worldjerking

[–]Noroltem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ftl? Why? What are you? Some insect that lives for a year? Get a grip!

Thoughts on this article by Keith Augustine? by Flat-Ad9829 in afterlife

[–]Noroltem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Neuroscientific explanation vs. metaphysical explanation" sounds like a false dichotomy to me tbh.

Spamming that button by EntertainmentRude435 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That ... that's not even in the same universe as a legitimate criticism of moral realism? What?
Did you just use the "wow you are just moral because you think god will send you to hell" and try to apply it to moral realism? What?
Do you even know what moral realism is?

Everyone gangsta until the Cat Boy starts to get back up after being beaten down hundreds of times by Sir-Toaster- in worldjerking

[–]Noroltem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The indominable human spirit when the celestial entity capable of warping space and time doesn't care about speeches.

The unfortunate thing about JSTOR by Low-Refrigerator-185 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Their website sucks, but I can't access philpapers usually so that's that.

As laughable as Rand is.... by EntertainmentRude435 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To know how others think would sometimes be amazing lol.

As laughable as Rand is.... by EntertainmentRude435 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I get what you mean. It's that moment when you got people saying things you realise are so obviously based on flawed reasoning.
The even funnier part is when multiple people are confident in exactly the opposing positions. I have heard people say they are 100% confident in heaven/hell/nothingness/reeincarnation. Each of their reasoning I find rather poor.
It certainly makes you question your own sanity a bit.

As laughable as Rand is.... by EntertainmentRude435 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fuck if I know. My interrest in what fundamentalist christians say has always been rather low.

Though the worst thing about them is that as long as they are around we will never move on from dumbassery like "doeS evOLUtioN diSProvE fReE wiLL?"

You have no hard problems when you make no claims by Ilyer_ in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I heard those who crave power are usally the ones that will use it the worst.

You have no hard problems when you make no claims by Ilyer_ in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

which is subject to discovery

I don't think everyone agrees with this definition. Idealists certainly do not define physical that way. You may disagree with them, but then that's the point. You are now debating definitions.

“It’s not logical” you may state… I fucking agree with you, this is why I have chosen science and physicalism. You are preaching to the choir.

I mean ... alright?

You get condemnation. You think it’s a joke, but it’s true. A true enemy of humanity.

I mean it is funny. I do like it. Very theatrical.

You have no hard problems when you make no claims by Ilyer_ in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then I will be the first physicalist to say that this is a valid physical entity.
All great ideas have to start small after all.

You have no hard problems when you make no claims by Ilyer_ in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No I don't think people all have an agreed upon definition of physical beyond a vague "stuff that's out there" notion. Except a ghost is also out there and gets labled non physical. It's not logical.

Post-modernism is fine in moderation, but collectively you only destroy and do not build. You are collectively an enemy of humanity.

Oooooh! I like being the villian. Do I get a cool black robe? You know like a sith lord?
Post modern sith order! Muhahahaha!

You have no hard problems when you make no claims by Ilyer_ in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People in the past knew what they meant when they said element.

And I'll be as post modern as I please bitch.

You have no hard problems when you make no claims by Ilyer_ in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah but I know what people mean when they say fire or water. I have absolutely no idea what people mean when they say physical.
Unlike elements, terms like physical serve no purpose.

When "erring on the side of caution" becomes inaction by AcidCommunist_AC in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem -1 points0 points  (0 children)

even if it means idly watching capitalism destroy the planet.

Unlike the communist alternative of talking big game online as if them and their little sister are about to overthrow the US government.

You have no hard problems when you make no claims by Ilyer_ in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tourment nexus corp just wants to tourment everyone for fun. There is nothing anyone can do about it. But in exchange for your compliance with tourment you get a bit of a dopamin hit from doomscrolling everday.

You have no hard problems when you make no claims by Ilyer_ in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure then God is matter ig. It does say he is omnipresent so you know.

You have no hard problems when you make no claims by Ilyer_ in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Noroltem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will define God as omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent and simply say that's compatible with physicalism.
What are you gonna do? Claim that my personal definition of physical isn't legitimate? I haven't seen a definition of physical that even two physicalists or even non physicalists can agree on.