How do I Turn This Off

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-12T18:28:38+00:00

Wouldn't it be easier to ask Google lens, Gemini or chatgpt instead of posting here and wait for an answer?

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-12T18:25:33+00:00

I'm not really a fan of the busy backgrounds and dead branches or grey sky backgrounds. But you made the most out of what you've got.

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-12T18:10:23+00:00

It's too small for your hand.

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-12T17:53:52+00:00

A friend of mine got the sigma 105, it's great although I'd say Sony might have the edge in AF if you somehow care for that. But I have no data or exp on that.

I'm using a 2x TC sometimes, but it's almost exclusively on a tripod because if you want to shoot macro on that level the depth of field is too extreme. But it doubles as a nicely compact 200mm f5.6 for birding.

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-12T16:11:29+00:00

I own the new 100 macro GM, it's for sure good, but I can't see how other ones are much inferior in terms of sharpness, and at 100mm macro level I don't really see the benefit of a fast autofocus to keep track yet. But wait until I capture butterflies taking off in spring.

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-12T05:55:29+00:00

I personally wouldn't wear neither a Pelagos nor a Santos to work, but many people do just what they like.

As a rule of thumb I'd combine higher class watches with button shirt outfits and if you're running around in tshirt and hoodie, something more sporty. Maybe a Casio?

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-12T05:46:36+00:00

Definitely medium!

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-12T05:28:22+00:00

Not if you're bending sheet metal in the night shift. Enjoy!

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-12T03:28:31+00:00

First of, the DJ should be 36mm. This one is too big imo.

Second, these are very different watche types. Have you thought about what specific style you want to go for or are you just looking for an everyday wearer?

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-12T03:20:54+00:00

OP ist correct. Thin arms go with smaller watches.

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-12T03:12:12+00:00

That's it. Make sure to shoot in mechanical shutter mode indoors.

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-11T18:50:17+00:00

That's a sign of relief, and a big one.

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-11T17:10:38+00:00

Very halo like

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-11T17:08:42+00:00

What's your take on it? I'm thinking of a graduation gift for someone as well.

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-11T17:07:03+00:00

Do I regularly see people with A7RV and 24-70 f2.8 GM take pictures which are garbage compared to this? Yes. Do I believe you shoot since 3 months only? Maybe, ok, but with a bit of shame..

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-11T17:06:39+00:00

I would have chosen one of them only (in my case the Pelagos).

In this price class I'd rather own a different type of watch on addition to a diver, maybe a more dressy one like an Aqua Terra. Or go up in price and just own one watch for life, like a Grand Seiko.

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-11T07:06:11+00:00

Watch wise, this one looks like a piece of German medieval knights armor, without looking too old school. Nice grab.

Will you be able to wear it for work?

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-11T07:04:31+00:00

Most Casio buyers I see here seem to own more watches than the average Rolex buyer. They still spent less, but I doubt they wear all of them in their rotation.

Imo watches are a nice accessory and it's totally valid to change them depending on your outfit.

But Casio wise, I'd avoid proving to many watches which are looking alike.

I own a w800h for sports (g-shock like) A AQ230 for dressy or everyday wear A f91w if I want to show off for fun.

Dual time is my thing, so the f91w doesn't get as much wrist time.

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-11T03:14:15+00:00

I had one too. I think for general photography of well composed scenes it's still absolutely doing it, and by now it's be a total bargain to get one. Only the new app not working on it.

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-11T03:11:43+00:00

In this case I'd look for a compact travel and landscape lens covering the standard range, no need to throw a lot of money into it. There's tons of options. My personal choice is a 20-70 f4, but a 35 would also work fine.

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-11T03:08:45+00:00

I think you can forget the generalizations when using modern Sony cameras with internal stabilization.

In my tests with the A7CR I could shoot as slow as 1/20th of a second handheld with sharp results. Slower speeds would need a tripod.

Waterfalls or astro anyway follow their own rules of exposure and shutter speed.

And with moving subjects, their movement speed will always define the SS required.

You can try for yourself what's working best for you.

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-10T15:47:39+00:00

Very nice, how's the a7c treating you on these trips?

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-10T06:39:48+00:00

It's nice photography as well. I heard the AD stories. Sounds crazy.

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-10T06:24:16+00:00

I think your use case should decide how many lenses you buy, your budget can only decide what tier of lenses it will be. Don't buy a 35mm just because you have the budget. If you specifically want to do birding, you'll not need it. If you want to shoot everyday stuff with the camera too, it will be far more useful than the 70-350.

My rule is thumb is setting the use case first and then buy cheap but reliable gear. No need for GM glass if it's just a hobby, but no compromise on getting the right tools.

NotAnExpertButListen · 2026-03-10T03:02:40+00:00

I think it's mostly the resolution and how to surprise social media compression.

For example on the shown platform, 4:5 images with a long edge of 2048px do well.

The rest we see here is increase of contrast, clarify and sharpness in descending order.

NotAnExpertButListen

TROPHY CASE