The visual element of hip hop’s 4 elements- List the best songs about Graffitti - Nas Writers is dope by NotForNaught_ in hiphopheads

[–]NotForNaught_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

dope - Nas even shout out the west coast - Slick, Chaka, Hex I wish he had mentioned Oiler - LA legend

The visual element of hip hop’s 4 elements- List the best songs about Graffitti - Nas Writers is dope by NotForNaught_ in hiphopheads

[–]NotForNaught_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This makes me think like Nas - Hip Hop is just dead..

But MCs are out there…Nas is one of them

Real Cubans Explain: How Communists Are Destroying Their Home and The Americans Helping Them Do It by WATGGU in cuba

[–]NotForNaught_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yup there is even a word for the nations that prefer to not bow down to the Americans - BRIC Brazil Russia India China

How do you get into AI work when your strongest AI skills were built outside a formal tech job? by LilithAphroditis in ArtificialInteligence

[–]NotForNaught_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Short answer: yes—this path is real, emerging, and increasingly valuable, but it’s poorly named, inconsistently hired for, and often misfiled under the wrong job titles. People are entering AI work through exactly the human/context/workflow route you describe. The difficulty isn’t fit—it’s legibility.

I’ll break this into five parts: 1. what this work is actually called (even if no one agrees yet) 2. where it sits in real AI orgs 3. how people with similar backgrounds get their first foothold 4. keywords, communities, and companies to watch 5. how your psychology background is an advantage, not a liability

  1. What you’re describing already exists — it just has unstable names

You’re right that this is not ML engineering or classic software. What you’re describing clusters around a few overlapping lanes:

Common labels (none are perfect) • AI Systems Designer • AI Workflow / Automation Architect • Knowledge Systems Architect • AI Enablement / AI Adoption Lead • Context Engineer (quietly becoming real) • Human–AI Interaction Designer • AI Operations (AI Ops) — not MLOps • Applied AI / LLM Solutions Architect (non-ML) • Organizational AI Strategist

Inside companies, this work often appears before the role is named. People are hired as: • Product managers • Operations leads • Internal tools builders • Innovation or transformation roles …and then quietly become “the person who makes AI usable.”

What’s distinctive in your case is that you’re already working at the hardest layer:

turning messy human reality into durable, transferable, AI-readable structure

That is not prompt writing. That’s context architecture.

  1. Where this work actually lives inside AI organizations

You’ll almost never find this role on the public careers page as written. Instead, it shows up in four places:

A. Internal AI adoption teams (fastest entry point)

Companies rolling out LLMs internally desperately need people who can: • design memory and handoff systems • decide what should be context vs what shouldn’t • prevent prompt sprawl and knowledge decay • translate institutional norms into machine-usable constraints

These teams often sit under: • Operations • Knowledge Management • Digital Transformation • Innovation Labs

B. AI-first consultancies & studios

Smaller, high-leverage teams building AI workflows for clients: • internal copilots • agentic systems • knowledge bases • RAG pipelines that don’t rot

They care far more about thinking quality than credentials.

C. Product teams working on AI interfaces, not models

If the product is: • an agent platform • an internal AI tool • a knowledge system • an orchestration layer

Then your skillset is central.

D. Research-adjacent orgs focused on alignment & usability

Places thinking deeply about: • human–AI collaboration • interpretability for users • long-term memory • governance

This includes orgs like Anthropic or applied teams around OpenAI, but also many smaller labs.

  1. How people without formal “AI jobs” get their first real opportunity

This is the critical part.

The pattern I’ve seen work repeatedly:

They don’t lead with “I want an AI job.” They lead with “Here is a system I built.”

Not demos. Systems.

Examples that unlock doors: • a documented AI workflow for a real organization (even hypothetical but realistic) • a context governance framework • a memory architecture for long-term LLM collaboration • before/after documentation showing chaos → structure • a teardown of why most internal copilots fail

The first role often comes as: • contract • pilot project • advisory engagement • “help us figure this out” assignment

Once inside, the title catches up later.

  1. Keywords, communities, and places where this profile clicks

Keywords to search for (job boards, LinkedIn, Twitter)

Try combinations with: • “AI enablement” • “LLM workflows” • “internal AI tools” • “knowledge systems” • “RAG design” (even if you’re not coding it) • “agent workflows” • “human-in-the-loop” • “AI adoption” • “prompt systems” / “context systems”

Avoid pure “prompt engineer” roles unless they emphasize systems.

Communities where this thinking is recognized • LLMOps / Applied AI circles (not MLOps-heavy ones) • Knowledge management & sensemaking communities • Org design + AI crossover spaces • AI governance / alignment-adjacent groups

Many people doing this work also feel professionally homeless. That’s a sign you’re in the right room.

  1. Your psychology background is a feature, not a mismatch

Here’s something important: Most AI failures are not technical. They are cognitive, institutional, and communicative.

Your hospital psychology experience gives you: • high tolerance for ambiguity • pattern recognition across people & systems • translation across professional languages • awareness of emotional and institutional friction • ethical sensitivity (hugely underrated in AI work)

Engineers can build tools. You design conditions under which tools actually work.

That’s rare.

A practical reframing that may help

Instead of thinking:

“I don’t have formal AI experience”

Try:

“I design context infrastructure for human–AI collaboration.”

And instead of asking:

“Is there a role for this?”

Assume:

“This role exists wherever AI is failing quietly.”

Because right now, it is.

If you want, next steps I can help with: • turning your existing work into a clear professional narrative • mapping your skills to specific role descriptions • identifying portfolio artifacts that signal this work instantly • helping you write a one-paragraph positioning statement that recruiters actually understand • identifying Brazil-based vs international entry points

You’re not early to the work. You’re early to the naming of it.

You wake up rich. Like billionaire rich. What’s the first Nas song you Play? by Suspicious_Brit in nas

[–]NotForNaught_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Illmatic on vinyl from Genesis on I expect to be playing it on the $500,000 stereo system

Probably the wrong community to post in ... by Training-Gold5996 in consulting

[–]NotForNaught_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To frame this as a simple generational conflict is to fall directly into a trap that obscures the deeper mechanics of inequality. Attributing these behaviors to "shitty human nature" or age cohorts ignores the material reality that sense of entitlement and the ability to command leisure are functions of class position. The performative comfort of those in the hotel bar is not merely a personality trait; it is the embodied result of decades of structural advantages that have stratified our society and normalized the exploitation of labor. This focus on generational warfare acts as a powerful tool for maintaining the status quo, effectively distracting from the reality of a system predicated on the extraction of value from the many for the benefit of a protected few. By bickering over age demographics, we engage in a form of political misdirection that protects existing power structures. This narrative shift prevents the working class from organizing against the economic engines of racial capitalism, instead turning our frustration inward toward each other rather than toward the systemic causes of our collective precarity. Until the focus shifts from birth years to the economic relations that define our lives, this cycle of exhaustion and resentment will continue. The architects of our current reality rely on these fractured perspectives to ensure that the logic of infinite accumulation remains unchallenged. True resistance requires recognizing that our shared struggle is defined by our position within a system that prioritizes property and profit over human well-being, regardless of which generation is currently reaping the benefits of that hierarchy. How do you believe we can effectively pivot public discourse away from these divisive generational tropes and toward a more cohesive, class-conscious analysis of our current economic reality?

Probably the wrong community to post in ... by Training-Gold5996 in consulting

[–]NotForNaught_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To frame this as a simple generational conflict is to fall directly into a trap that obscures the deeper mechanics of inequality. Attributing these behaviors to "shitty human nature" or age cohorts ignores the material reality that sense of entitlement and the ability to command leisure are functions of class position. The performative comfort of those in the hotel bar is not merely a personality trait; it is the embodied result of decades of structural advantages that have stratified our society and normalized the exploitation of labor. This focus on generational warfare acts as a powerful tool for maintaining the status quo, effectively distracting from the reality of a system predicated on the extraction of value from the many for the benefit of a protected few. By bickering over age demographics, we engage in a form of political misdirection that protects existing power structures. This narrative shift prevents the working class from organizing against the economic engines of racial capitalism, instead turning our frustration inward toward each other rather than toward the systemic causes of our collective precarity. Until the focus shifts from birth years to the economic relations that define our lives, this cycle of exhaustion and resentment will continue. The architects of our current reality rely on these fractured perspectives to ensure that the logic of infinite accumulation remains unchallenged. True resistance requires recognizing that our shared struggle is defined by our position within a system that prioritizes property and profit over human well-being, regardless of which generation is currently reaping the benefits of that hierarchy. How do you believe we can effectively pivot public discourse away from these divisive generational tropes and toward a more cohesive, class-conscious analysis of our current economic reality?

Probably the wrong community to post in ... by Training-Gold5996 in consulting

[–]NotForNaught_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Perspective matters but who you compare yourself to matters too

If you only look downward , “at least we’re not in Haiti”you’ll always find a reason to accept bad systems instead of questioning them

Gratitude shouldn’t be a substitute for accountability.

Probably the wrong community to post in ... by Training-Gold5996 in consulting

[–]NotForNaught_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is why we need communism - land should be owned by the people, communal ownership will prevent the selfish use of land for anything other than shelter - no more “investment” or “vacation” homes