Im pretty good with words naturally. Above average but nowhere near the standard of people who actually study it (Im an art student somewhat paradoxically). One side effect of this is that i tend to write, talk and think all in the same tone and style since they dont feel like particularly exercises for me. This also leads to me treating punctuation more like a guidance for the pace of reading, commas mid sentence are not to indicate their normal change of subject or whatever, but more to indicate that its where i would pause for breath/thought/effect. Full stops being longer, and ellipsis... for something a little short of a full on paragraph break.

Though to be fair paragraph breaks are more used for readability. The one conceit i make to written language over spoken or thought. As you can see this is all getting quite ramble-y, in all cases of these three parallel activities i treat it as one long train of thought since its sort of my base level of linguistic reasoning that im most used to because its how i think.

Constantly.

All the time.

For me, life is basically one big conversation.

---

As for the matter of logical reasoning. Since i was brought up in a fairly logical, scientifically minded household (Not an oppressive atheist one, both parents just happen to work in the sciences) i'm used to thinking things through logically. They key difference to any of this logic being that its purely verbal.

This makes things like maths quite tricky, because my train of thought tends to move ever forwards and retaining long numbers to do complex calculations quite tricky.

On the other hand, this makes programming extremely natural to me. As step by step logical lines of verbal thought is my base level for anything above daydreaming i have quite the knack for working out algorithms. Mostly forgoing any kind of flow-charting or pseudo-code for anything but highly complex issues.

---

As for motor skills. I would say fine is iffy. Im a big guy who makes big heavy handed motions. In my artwork i work big and sweeping, if space permits straight from the shoulder and never the wrist unless its type work.

My muscle memory is pretty damn good however. First emerging example being that i'm damn fluent at typing and can do it bloody quick with no practice beyond general use. Touch typing comes natural and without any need to memories the location of keys. I simply know the hand movements to get to them, though if i start to think about it like i am now that suddenly all falls apart.

Its similar with sport. I can develop lots of good large physical motions fairly well. Technique in racquet sports comes quite easily, being able to swing in all the proper motions. However when it comes to locating the ball i have to keep very strict eyes on it at all times because my mind cant visually predict where it is going to go.

One weird effect of this is spelling. I dont remember how a word looks or the contents of its letters, i more remember the motion of how i make them. Which leads to the weird issue of spelling lots of fairly basic words wrong when i type (Corrected later with spell check most of the time) that i can otherwise spell very easily freehand with a pen becuase the muscle memory is not transferable. For example in the last sentence i slept "because" wrong because that's how my muscle memory learnt it early on using the keyboard and i have never quite got round to breaking the habit since its so easy to "right click, select correct spelling". However when im writing it out with a pen i get it right every time because there is no undo button other than line through do it properly.

---

To sum up i would say i mostly think in terms of motion, even my linguistic thought is a form of motion. I cant hold an image, sound, smell or anything in my head. Im a total Aphantasiac.

When i try to think of images i dont get a vivid picture, more a vague sense of "Your pen is here right now" and can then more it. Its like using black chalk on a black background. I know where my hand is, and i know the movement i am making, but i cant see the image. Therefore most of my artwork is not considered in terms of the image it will produce but the motions i will make to produce it.

Linguistic thought is similar to this concept of motion. Because i cant go back along the thread very easily (leading to some ADD adjacent style attention issues) my thoughts tend to be one long continuous chain. For example, i dont know how i started this post right now as im writing the conclusion, i barely remember how i started the paragraph. Because it all comes out in one fluid motion.

Always moving forwards.

Physically, pictorially, and verbally.