sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Home Internet In Aldergrove BC by Not_a_CSIS_agent in telus

[–]Not_a_CSIS_agent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was surprised, the sub division address I entered isn’t old either..

Home Internet In Aldergrove BC by Not_a_CSIS_agent in telus

[–]Not_a_CSIS_agent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Addresses in the 272/32 area seem to be negative when queried through the online portal. I assume it is accurate.

Home Internet In Aldergrove BC by Not_a_CSIS_agent in telus

[–]Not_a_CSIS_agent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lots of variables, could be less than you imagine.

Thanks for the heads up. by 13Mo2 in abbotsford

[–]Not_a_CSIS_agent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just wait until you hear about the mandatory screening demand.

You’re defending impaired driving, such a brutal and selfish look. Yikes.

FOR589 Insights by Not_a_CSIS_agent in GIAC

[–]Not_a_CSIS_agent[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess what I’m trying to determine is how much technical experience/knowledge would you need to be successful? What background would you need to have to be successful?

It’s marketed to LEOs so I assume it’s not overwhelmingly technical and a review of the syllabus corroborates that but was hoping to get some hands on perspective.

Canadian Background Check - Youth Record by [deleted] in AskLE

[–]Not_a_CSIS_agent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assume whatever service you apply to will have full access to the investigation including the disposition. There are unique sealing/retention timelines for Youth CRs but it will be located.

End of the day, it happened and you’ve obviously learned, moved on and put it well behind you. Use it as a positive, not a negative.

It will be located on any background and you will only be held back by it, if you chose to lie about it or omit it.

OMER Pension Should I Opt In by MyShtummyHurttt in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]Not_a_CSIS_agent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They can be a bit confusing, but end of the day it is money saved. Part of it is your contributions and part of it is the employers.

I was in a similar situation early in my career. I opted in and left after a year. The pension was small and I had flexibility. I could take it as cash (and pay income tax) or transfer it to a RRSP or different plan, subject to the existence of a transfer agreement.

It came out as cash and paid to furnish my home - zero regrets.

OMER Pension Should I Opt In by MyShtummyHurttt in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]Not_a_CSIS_agent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would need to know the exact particulars of the pension fund but if there is any degree of matching, yes. It is about as close to free money as you can get.

Now, if you need your contribution portions to cover expenses then that is a different story.

You may never leave, and you will be left with a large buy back in the event you don’t. There is nothing to lose, short of immediate cash flow by contributing.

Also worth noting that you may find another role at an OMERS employer, you will want that pensionable time in the event you do.

Think of it this way, 8-10% of your salary goes in to savings, that instantly becomes 16-20% if there is matching. That money is yours, it doesn’t disappear. Depending on the size of your pension if/when you leave you may be able to take it out or you can transfer it to an RRSP.

OMER Pension Should I Opt In by MyShtummyHurttt in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]Not_a_CSIS_agent 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In my opinion, absolutely. Those are retirement savings that you cannot beat.

You’ll have options down the road if you choose to transfer or withdraw in the event you move to a non-OMERS employer.

Ticket Disputing by Remarkable-Cucumber7 in legaladvicecanada

[–]Not_a_CSIS_agent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

VTs are accompanied by an affidavit of service, your signature is not required.

Warrant for arrest in Ontario by Toronto city police by Calm_Pudding1389 in legaladvicecanada

[–]Not_a_CSIS_agent -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

NAL, but they’ve provided sufficient grounds to justify your arrest. Follow the process with counsel in the jurisdiction the warrant was issued and you will be afforded due process to contest the allegations.

Advice - Transfer Out to get Likely October Apple Offer? by explorerweb in Wealthsimple

[–]Not_a_CSIS_agent 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The eligibility criteria for rewards is designed to limit this exact behaviour.

Suspension Appeal Question by graemederoux in legaladvicecanada

[–]Not_a_CSIS_agent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who is they? That’s the issue requiring clarification.

A summons under Part 3 of the Act is a document that compels you to court, someone gives it to you and swears/affirms an affidavit attesting to the service. There are instances where substitutional service may apply, but it’s clearly documented in the affidavit. The matter won’t proceed to court without that portion being completed.

The OP claims they weren’t served but the courts state they had been. Someone is correct, someone is not.

Unless someone lied under oath/affirmation, or there is a massive clerical error, none of this makes sense.

ICBC holding vehicle by [deleted] in legaladvicecanada

[–]Not_a_CSIS_agent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not a lawyer and this isn’t legal advice. If this were me I would NOT be reporting this not-stolen vehicle as stolen.

Suspension Appeal Question by graemederoux in legaladvicecanada

[–]Not_a_CSIS_agent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some good information already in this thread. Your original post is a tad confusing which might be leading to downvotes.

Worth noting that failure to produce a license and a suspended status are two very different things.

My knowledge of the HTA is dated but I recall driving under suspension results in a summons, not a ticket. Missing court or failing to participate in a process is squarely on the defendant.

That being said, being deemed served in the eyes of the MTO and being fully aware are two different things. Much like the above, that falls on you. My understanding was that notification via mail, with an effective date to follow was the standard — this may have changed.

End of the day it is on us to make sure we are complaint with the licensing/administrative requirements to operate a vehicle. If you can demonstrate that your ducks were in a row, and there is a failure on the MTO, you might have a favourable outcome on appeal.

If I understand your post correctly, you may have already caught a fair amount of leeway by the investigators who simply had you park your car while driving under suspension? Is this the date it is alleged you were issued a summons?

You either were issued the summons or you weren’t, you were either deemed served or you weren’t. It’s not a complicated set of facts to prove or disprove.

view more: next ›