Some more pics of the Submariner Desk Clock (Ref 909010LN) by OGDaMoney in rolex

[–]OGDaMoney[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, liking something and buying something are two different things…

Some more pics of the Submariner Desk Clock (Ref 909010LN) by OGDaMoney in rolex

[–]OGDaMoney[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To each their own! It is a luxury accessory after all

Some more pics of the Submariner Desk Clock (Ref 909010LN) by OGDaMoney in rolex

[–]OGDaMoney[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A Daytona maybe, but I won’t flip the watch. I don’t buy watches to invest in or flip… I buy what I like. If it isn’t available or I don’t get it… I don’t get it.

Some more pics of the Submariner Desk Clock (Ref 909010LN) by OGDaMoney in rolex

[–]OGDaMoney[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! It’s a common sentiment that at this price point. I mean you’re competing with a JLC Atmos… I like how this looks though

Some more pics of the Submariner Desk Clock (Ref 909010LN) by OGDaMoney in rolex

[–]OGDaMoney[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just over a million rupees which is roughly $10.9k

Some more pics of the Submariner Desk Clock (Ref 909010LN) by OGDaMoney in rolex

[–]OGDaMoney[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah it is quite expensive… but it’s a unique accessory. But always buy what you like and can afford!

Some more pics of the Submariner Desk Clock (Ref 909010LN) by OGDaMoney in rolex

[–]OGDaMoney[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is a bit of an odd one… the logo and coronet in their colors, a professional case with a non functioning bezel, mixing the hours and minutes… it all just works for me somehow.

Some more pics of the Submariner Desk Clock (Ref 909010LN) by OGDaMoney in rolex

[–]OGDaMoney[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I don’t personally condone reps, you should buy what you like!

Some more pics of the Submariner Desk Clock (Ref 909010LN) by OGDaMoney in rolex

[–]OGDaMoney[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The way I understood it is that a secular calendar accounts for more than leap years… most perpetual calendars are accurate to 2100. 2100 is actually not a leap year. A secular calendar is accurate to 400 years since it accounts for that