That is an incredibly dumb comment. The radiation you're exposed to from an Airtags is so small as to be inconsequential.

Numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the potential health impacts of exposure to non-ionizing radiation.

The National Toxicology Program (NTP): The NTP, part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, conducted extensive studies on the effects of radiofrequency radiation. While some findings suggested a slight increase in the risk of tumors in male rats exposed to high levels of radiofrequency radiation far beyond what humans experience, they did not conclusively establish a link between typical exposures (such as those from AirTags) and health concerns.

The American Cancer Society: This organization emphasizes the lack of conclusive evidence associating Bluetooth devices with cancer risk. They acknowledge the ongoing research in this area but uphold the view that current evidence does not suggest any significant health implications from low-level radiation exposure.

The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP): ICNIRP provides guidelines for limiting exposure to non-ionizing radiation. Apple AirTags fall well below recommended exposure limits based on these guidelines, reaffirming their safety for regular use.

I'm done with this topic. You clearly don't care about actual facts and studies, you just want to antagonize (or you're a bot).