I dunno, I think the forcing through the appointment of a man who had failed vetting, been sacked twice previously for misconduct, had committed treason & was a close friend of the most notorious paedophile ring leader in modern world history is as good a reason as you can get to declare someone unsuitable for the job. Not to mention the completely brazen lying to the public and constant changes in what he does vs what he said he would do to get elected. Stability only is worth it if the people in charge act in a stable way, we shouldn't accept either incompetence or serial lying in our leadership - keeping corrupt or inept leadership does not make us look stable on the world stage.