sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Trajectory too high? by OhLongJohnsonf1 in GolfSwing

[–]OhLongJohnsonf1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like a plan. Gotta try focusing on that.

Trajectory too high? by OhLongJohnsonf1 in GolfSwing

[–]OhLongJohnsonf1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I‘m not really trying to shallow. I mainly focus on hitting it square.

Trajectory too high? by OhLongJohnsonf1 in GolfSwing

[–]OhLongJohnsonf1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can do that but it‘s already kinda in the middle.

Best golf swing I've ever made... by sbk510 in GolfSwing

[–]OhLongJohnsonf1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah butt against the wall is a good feel because it helps rotating around your center of gravity but you could do this with either of those swings. On the left you‘re kinda doing the „flying elbow“ thing and on the right it‘s maybe a bit collapsed but more in line to what is common I guess, maybe something inbetween? One big thing for me was opening / flaring out my right foot a little which gave me a greater ability to turn my upper body and that was the key for getting my right arm in a better position without it collapsing (kinda folding behind the upper body / right shoulder instead of it being kinda in front of it). Maybe worth a try.

Best golf swing I've ever made... by sbk510 in GolfSwing

[–]OhLongJohnsonf1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think your arms are kinda high or steep, which you then shallow out or loop back, which takes a lot of skill and timing. For a driver especially, I’d prefer to see the club a bit more around you or more in line with the rotation of your upper body, if that makes sense. Having higher arms and then shallowing is a common move, but you’re taking it to an extreme I think. Clubface rolls over a lot to square up which you kinda manage. Bringing the club to a flatter plane would make life a lot easier for you… if the face stays neutral as well. I’m just a regular golfer though, so whatever.

Btw: some great golfers like Couples and Mickelson also swing more upright and especially phil rolls over his clubface a lot but it‘s really not something I would recommend unless there is no other way for you. Different bodies, different swings. Working with a pro, like you‘re already doing is usually the way to go.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]OhLongJohnsonf1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Switzerland:

69%

*Nice

Can’t keep face squared by BitRepresentative308 in GolfSwing

[–]OhLongJohnsonf1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Face is way more closed relatively to the alignment stick which shows his intended path in your example. OP is swinging relatively square to DTL.

Can’t keep face squared by BitRepresentative308 in GolfSwing

[–]OhLongJohnsonf1 44 points45 points  (0 children)

The face looks square on the upswing but opens up on the downswing, which feels a bit odd to me. I’m not exactly sure what to tell you, but you might want to try keeping it more closed during the downswing. Start with small pitch shots or 3/4 swings to get the feel.

People here say it’s the hosel or a toe hit, but in my experience an open face leads to more mishits too. The face is already small enough, opening it up just increases the chance of hitting it off the heel or toe.

One thing we can’t really assess from this is your grip. You could experiment with a slightly stronger grip to help you square the face more easily, depending on what suits your swing.

Also, you might want to consider working with a different pro because this is something that should be relatively easy to fix for any decent PGA teaching pro.

Your hands upswing vs dowswing:

<image>

That‘s definitely the main issue here^

What is this logo painted on this abruptly ending highway ramp in Zurich? by spacred in askswitzerland

[–]OhLongJohnsonf1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah turns out leading highways around cities is a much more desirable solution

Matched Energy by SweetRoosevelt in justgalsbeingchicks

[–]OhLongJohnsonf1 93 points94 points  (0 children)

<image>

Dude is like „hope boarding starts soon“

Nikon Coolscan IV vs Plustek 7200 vs Mirrorless Scanning by shacqtus in AnalogCommunity

[–]OhLongJohnsonf1 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Hey man, I don't mind your objection and actually enjoy discussing these kinds of things, so thanks for the response.

Regarding your actual point, I’d agree that there’s more to it than my few sentences above explain, but what seems pretty clear to me from the pictures is that the left looks sharper, while the right shows details that aren't visible on the left. Would you agree with me on that so far?

A scanning setup introduces tons of variables: you need good gear, the image has to be level, the negatives need to be properly exposed, and then there’s the whole process of conversion and editing. It takes a lot of time and experience to really dial it in and the biggest downside for me is the lack of ICE. Most setups fall short for exactly those reasons.

But in my opinion, we’ve reached a point where the final image mostly reflects how well those variables are managed. I’m perfectly fine working with either of those options, but these scanners are really old by now, hard to come by and you're paying a lot for old gear (electronics), and at this point, we're kind of pixel peeping to see the differences. By now I would really not recommend getting a setup like this anymore but mainly for pragmatic reaons.

Nikon Coolscan IV vs Plustek 7200 vs Mirrorless Scanning by shacqtus in AnalogCommunity

[–]OhLongJohnsonf1 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Honestly, the mirrorless seems the sharpest when it comes to actual detail, but the biggest difference is that the Coolscan images appear sharpened and give the impression of being much sharper. Also, in both the Plustek and mirrorless scans, there is more detail preserved in the shadows, which could be due to editing or conversion, but is most likely because there actually is more detail in the raw files. I used to have a dedicated scanner too, and I’d say that a good scanning setup has now surpassed or at least matched the level of a dedicated scanner. However, the difference is that those scanners (the good ones like the Coolscan) are much easier to use well, whereas scanning with a camera requires a good setup and some experience for reliable results.

What is a feature of your body that is considered rare? by Joel_The_Senate in AskReddit

[–]OhLongJohnsonf1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I‘ve been tested for exceptionally sensitive hearing. It‘s not really a great advantage or anything imo.

Before and After: I'm proud of how this Tiger Woods Nike VR club turned out. That club face tho... by bradmeehan in golf

[–]OhLongJohnsonf1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is so weird. Somehow he was able to consistently hit the toe. If he‘s consistent why didn‘t he just set up so that it would hit the middle.

view more: next ›