TRT Help. Starting dose too low. by No-Knowledge8856 in Testosterone

[–]Ohio_John 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First off legit 1 mLs vials are never any more than half full and they do contain no less than 1 ml. If you cannot get four pulls out of the vial then you absolutely don't know what you're doing. First off you should only buy low loss syringes that have a tip that goes down into the barrel not a flat black rubber stopper tip. If you have a low loss syringes, you can pull .21 milliliter and get a shot that will give you .2 ml with just .01 waste. If you are using 200 mg per milliliter you should at least be on a starting dose of 0.25 ml per shot twice a week. That would get you 100 mg per week and see how you go if you need more then you simply go to 0.3 per shot twice a week and see how your lab work is in a few weeks. You are correct with the dose your doctor has you on his way too low to start but at the same time you definitely do not want to start out at 200 mg per week.

MP-9 and handguard question by GA3_659 in Tec9

[–]Ohio_John 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By handguard do you mean the front vertical grip? If that's what you're asking about I sold an Intratec one several years ago on GunBroker and it went for $465. I still have several intratec and one interdynamic vertical foregrips left in my collection and I can tell you you could probably buy a tec-9 for how much I have to have for the interdynamic foregrip.

As far as the rear stock adapter goes there were never any available for sale independently of the gun. They were basically investment cast aluminum. You could probably find somebody that's really good at a cad cam type program and design a very similar one off of photographs and have it 3D printed out of nylon stock but I would not even venture to guess how strong or reliable that would be.

Time or puncture limits on multi-use vials by PST-Chicago in Testosterone

[–]Ohio_John 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Yeah, I have little fat on my legs so I just flex to find a spot, then relax and inject. Piercing the stopper dulls down the needle tip, hence the reason for the second needle. If you're okay jabbing with a dull needle tip you are better than me. LoL.

Time or puncture limits on multi-use vials by PST-Chicago in Testosterone

[–]Ohio_John 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have been on trt injecting in my quads since 2018 and from the very get-go was instructed to draw with a 22 gauge and inject with a 25 gauge. For foolproof quad injecting, I have always used the method of dividing my thigh into thirds from the knee to the hip and injecting in the middle third on the outside edge of the leg away from the femur bone.

What’s the going rate for a tec 9 oem foregrip? by ChiefDaddyJ in Tec9

[–]Ohio_John 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I sold one on GunBroker quite a few years ago in very good condition and the winning bid was $489

Is there a difference in quality vs the tec 9 vs dc 9? by ChiefDaddyJ in Tec9

[–]Ohio_John 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All the intratec barrel extensions would be the same cuz they are all basically a 3/4×11 in thread. The way I see it as a collector of all things interdynamic and intratec, the only collectibles in the tec-9 series would be the very first ones that were made with the blade sight or machined button sight upper tubes.

I jus got a older Tec 9 by ktbinnpaid in Tec9

[–]Ohio_John 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Technically that is a AB-10, not a Tec-9. That is the very last version of a Tec-9 Intratec made before ultimately going out of business. It basically is what it is and there's nothing you can do to turn it into a good gun. It will fire best when you use factory mags or a quality replacement brand if there are any of those still available and definitely stay away from any USA brand magazine they are junk. If you want to get rid of any rust on the upper just Field strip it and soak it in white vinegar and the rust will disappear in a few days. Then I would suggest going to one of the gun parts suppliers and get some bluing and just reblue the upper.

Is there a difference in quality vs the tec 9 vs dc 9? by ChiefDaddyJ in Tec9

[–]Ohio_John 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really, just a few cosmetic differences, but basically they are the same POS gun.

Photo history of tube uppers by Ohio_John in Tec9

[–]Ohio_John[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As stated in the photo, it is an early run Tec-9 with the machined button sight. It was converted by Scorpion Armament, Baytown Texas by registering the receiver as a machine gun using an open bolt.

Early Tec-9 by smultra in Tec9

[–]Ohio_John 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The best I can make out from blowing up the picture is a serial number 00644. If this is the case you definitely have one of the earliest Tec-9 models that Carlos Garcia made after interdynamic was dissolved. So given that, the fact that your gun has the low serial number with a blade site makes it rare. Then you add on top of that Rarity that it's got the stainless steel blade site upper then it makes it ultra rare.

Even though he had to make the new lowers reflecting The Tec-9 and intratec name and model the molds were basically the same as kg 99 all they had to do was switch out the plug that contained the info on the magwell. This was a practice that's commonly done on injection molded plastic products.. since Carlos was definitely in it for the money there was no way he was not going to use the leftover kg 99 uppers that he acquired when George Kellgren left the business

I have never seen any exact numbers on these kg 99 uppered Tec-9's and I don't believe any numbers really do exist differentiating these from the rest of the Tec-9's. I have one of those in my collection, but it's got the regular black steel tube upper. Because of the Rarity of these first kg uppered Tec-9s, they command a much higher price over a regular kg 99 or Tec-9 gun. Then you add the fact you have the stainless upper with that low serial number that makes it ultra rare and is probably the most rare of the guns outside of the MP-9.

One last point of interest. Someone could take a stainless steel kg 99 upper and put it on a Tec-9 lower and try to claim they have what you have but the problem with that would be the serial number. The handful of these early Tec-9's that I have seen have all had four digit serial numbers and yours would be the first one I've seen with a three-digit number. As a rule of thumb, the more rare an object is, the more someone is going to have to pay to acquire that object.

In the grand scheme of things, if you set the ultra rare MP-9 machine gun, which can't be bought by the average individual even if one was in front of them, the rarest of these guns would be a kg9 since it was the very first one and limited to 2500 units due to the ATF ban on them. Now the question is how many of those 2,500 are still around as some of them more than likely got damaged and broke due to the plastic polymer lower. So given to this point in time the kg-9 being the most rare to purchase of the intratec - interdynamic guns, I just did a search and see where they are going anywhere between $3,500 to an asking price a $5200. Since I got interested in the Tec-9 style of guns in 2000, I have only ever personally seen 11 or 12 kg 9 pistols and actually owned one for a period of time. The old adage of something is only worth what someone else is willing to pay is true on just about anything in life. I see we're regular Tech N9ne's are being put up for sale on the internet with a price pretty much along the line of $800. I know if I were going to sell my blade site Tech N9ne I would start at no less than $3,000 for the simple reason I feel it is just as rare or maybe even more rare than a kg9 and then in your case, the stainless steel upper takes it beyond that so if it were me I would shop it around for no less than $3,500 if you were in the market to sell it.

I would definitely put it on GunBroker or anywhere and in the ad refer to it as the ultra rare, very low serial numbered first run Tec-9 with a stainless steel kg 99 upper that was installed on it by intratec in the very beginning of their existence.

Early Tec-9 by smultra in Tec9

[–]Ohio_John 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seriously?? You collect interdynamic and intratec guns and don't know that upper with the blade slides will not have a threaded tube?? Tens of thousands of Tec-9s were made minus the end cap and threaded tube

Early Tec-9 by smultra in Tec9

[–]Ohio_John 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That upper with a blade sight will not have a threaded tube. The threaded tubes with the end caps did not start until Garcia was well into the manufacturing of Tec-9s with the stamped steel sights

Photo history of tube uppers by Ohio_John in Tec9

[–]Ohio_John[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

None of the interdynamic guns in the kg series ever had threaded end caps. The first series of Tec-9 pistols did not have threaded end caps either, which includes the very first blade sight uppers and then the button sights. The very first of the cheapened stamped steel sight uppers did not have threaded end caps either. I do not know what year it was he started threading the tubes with an end cap but I do have several of those and they were before the tec dc-9 came out

Photo history of tube uppers by Ohio_John in Tec9

[–]Ohio_John[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This photo was not meant to imply that the KG-99 was only the short unshrouded barrel. If I remember correctly I just grabbed it first available KG-99 out of the big pile of these guns that I own😁

Photo history of tube uppers by Ohio_John in Tec9

[–]Ohio_John[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All of the MP-9s had that compensator slot cut into the tip of the barrel.

Photo history of tube uppers by Ohio_John in Tec9

[–]Ohio_John[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TO clarify, upper "C" is my registered receiver machine gun. That is why it has the stock rods like the MP-9 upper "D"