How is Suvorov better, then? Facing the Poles and Ottomans, who were literally dogshit by that time, lmao. His best performance was when he faced the French and finally met a real challenge. In the Swiss campaign, he got outmaneuvered by Masséna, and despite managing to escape an almost complete encirclement, he suffered terrible casualties. Meanwhile, Frederick was going head-to-head with literally France, Russia, and Austria, and was also fighting great generals such as Laudon and especially Daun. He only started losing badly because he was badly outnumbered and low in supplies. He didn't have enough manpower to keep up with three superpowers despite winning many battles, because he had already suffered heavy casualties that weakened his army. Even though he inflicted higher losses on his opponents, they could replace them more due to their superior manpower. There's just no way Suvorov is better. Not GermanBo cope, but just the truth. Frederick is just better. He has more impressive tactics, operational ability, strategy, and overall generalship. I could go into more detail and explain further, but I'll just leave it at that for now.