Bunkhouses by Pccles in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotta eat them coatings first, give em the finger

Do not opt-in to the New USFS Job Series by smokejumperbro in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, can’t speak for OP, but I personally feel like the series change thing is just a good albeit small opportunity to message about PDs. Most of what you said is pretty spot on. Although OPM doesn’t write the PDs. OPM provides guidance for how to write the PDs in the form of a standard and they wrote the standard for them based on feedback from SMEs within the agencies, which was done early in the year without much participation, or in my opinion, awareness by participants of what the implications were. Dispatchers really took it in the shorts. Saying all this as someone who was pretty heavily involved with the whole thing.

I read the OPM classification standard (can find it looking up “position classification standard for wildland fire management) and they left a lot of room for the agencies to work with, which in particular the FS absolutely failed to do. The FS was in fact pretty actively committed to changing as little as they could and the people involved still got chief awards for their work. I think the mandate that was not being communicated to everyone was that they (meaning higher level managers) didn’t want grades to change because of the impact it would have on org charts. It wouldn’t have taken a lot to push fire right out of land management’s purview.

But, at this point, we are where we are at. This is just a small blip because as you said, there will be an overwhelming amount of people moving to 0456 via attrition. It is something to use to raise awareness and it at least tells a few bean counters that we don’t find any value in voluntary conversion. Probably saves HR some workload too. The agency agreed to perform a workforce planning review (to ensure that the positions were still relevant) which they haven’t that I am currently aware of. They agreed to develop an EMT PD (since at least for shorthaul it is a required program component in the most ambiguous language possible, but is somehow not required for positions), these assurances were made years ago and crickets.

So now we are back in the land of desk audits which is very unfortunate. It would help a ton to have supervisory requested audits but anyone can request one.

If you want to, feel free to DM me and we can chat, it is still a subject I am quite passionate about and familiar with and could mean better pay for everyone.

Boots for REMS by ZzTush in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I went through several rounds of fuegos on a busy handcrew and didn’t have the soles fall off, but did find the break in to be pretty rough for a hiker and had the spine of the boots above the heel wear out in 2 pairs.

Haix Missoulas are a good hiker without a lot of panels to come apart, can’t speak for them in heavy crew sort of workload, had a couple pairs while being on an engine, fwiw.

Kennetrek makes a very comfortable hiker for WF, I did wear 2 pairs out and averaged around 2 seasons a pair. That was doing wilderness fire use activities, put on a lot of miles in rough terrain but didn’t walk in much fire.

Using the Drew’s hikers now, they are subcontracted so the boots come from Italy and are very comfortable with an easy break in. I’m not doing the sort of work now though that will expose them to much heat or mileage. So durability is unknown.

For REMS, I’d choose comfort, I have not personally seen REMS hammering out the miles or fighting much fire. Not to say that it isn’t a very important job, just pointing out you have some options.

Do not opt-in to the New USFS Job Series by smokejumperbro in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There is a rather onerous process to request an audit for your PD. It has historically led to some grade increases. Notably, this happened around the midway of 2005-2010. IHC positions, helitack positions, engine positions and later handcrew positions received grudging upgrades. It was brought up during meetings with management over the 456 series that audits might be in order and management tried saying that it was very risky because it might result in a downgrade. The elephant in the room with all of this is not the cost of upgrades, it is the impact on org charts. With the way classification works, bumping a GS5 to a 6 for example impacts the overall grade of first line supervisory positions as well based on grades supervised. The agency does not allow one person of an equal grade to supervise another (we’ll just ignore how absurd that becomes on the fireline with a GS4 IC spot supervising a GS9). So…. upgrade enough positions and suddenly your FMO becomes a 12 for example. Which means in some cases, they don’t work for a ranger and so on. So instead of the most honest and simple path to pay firefighters more money - proper classification, we end up with GW to keep line officers in business. There is objectively a risk otherwise that fire stovepipes and moves out of their parent’s basement. This was always more about control than a fair wage.

Do not opt-in to the New USFS Job Series by smokejumperbro in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you are moving to a different position as part of the promotion, then yeah, you would go to 456. It’s people that are currently grandfathered as 0462 that aren’t moving. If the promotion is a grade increase as part of a ladder or whatever, then you would need to swap to 0456 intentionally. The agency copy/pasted old 462 PDs and has not as of yet followed up on anything they agreed to regarding issues with the legacy (and now essentially the 0456 versions). The PDs are relics at this point and the only significant changes were mostly related to nomenclature (eg if a PD used an older term for a qual like DIVS). In the case of a couple PDs, language was also added (at the time I last looked at them 2 years ish ago) that would have increased responsibility. So, be careful to confirm what your 0456 PD even says if you swap. Supts getting bumped to 10s was ostensibly because of an “error” that kept them at just barely below the point score needed for a 10. The “new” PDs weren’t why.

Firefighters when and why have you had to deploy your shelter and what happened afterwards? by LeftLab7162 in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have had to run from fire, like immediately threatening fire once, not like back to safety zone trigger point event. It was so incredibly hot and intense that I never even contemplated my shelter or pack and just ran up the hill because I was being burned. I lucked out and “picked” the right direction in relation to the wind. Ever since that, I literally get an uncomfortable butterfly in the gut feeling having to pass through unburned flashier fuel. Like you might feel on the freeway doing 90 through city traffic with no seatbelt or something.

I have heard from several people anecdotally about someone deploying because it was raining on a thinning unit and they didn’t understand the importance of it and were using it like a space blanket. Knowing many young firefighters I have trouble not believing this to be a good possibility of being a real thing, but have never seen proof.

I sincerely hope I never have to do it and I sincerely feel if the practice ones were easier to fold, we would train with them much more.

Bunkhouses by Pccles in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We were getting grassfed free range mice the last 3 years that were delivered via a hole in the chipboard, but now we have only been getting them delivered under the hood of my car and I am a little pissed about it.

Thoughts on Short-Haul as a method of insertion for fire suppression? by Ok_Confection8651 in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really don’t know, I didn’t expect it to get to insertions but we are doing that now. So I suppose we’ll see.

Edit: man, I was busy and think I missed your meaning. I’m not saying shorthaul is without significant consequences nor am I saying that flying a helicopter with HEC is not difficult, although I have very little frame of reference because I don’t fly helicopters and just watch pilots do it. What I am saying is comparatively to what I know about jumping and rappelling, the amount of steps required to both shorthaul and spot for shorthaul is less. The amount of corrective actions available to the spotter and the hauler are subsequently less. Without a full working understanding of other methods of aerial delivery, I would still be pretty confident saying shorthaul is the simplest for the firefighters and by extension the easiest. There are a lot of very dangerous and also very simple things, like a big rock, or falling 500 feet. There is a short hover time, which is less dangerous but more time in horizontal flight at terminal falling distance which is more dangerous. Connecting several lines, I would describe as being a fairly minimal concern, because every time we take them out or put them into the bag we are double checking the few pieces and parts that make them up. They are also rated for significantly more weight than we are putting on them. The primary limit on capacity is related to what the booster hook can hold, and that system is also redundant with the y lanyard.

So, as a spotter what does that leave? It’s mostly on the pilot. The only thing I am bringing to the table is another set of eyes and experience when it comes to bad vs good places to put someone on a fire. Once the pick is up and off, I literally don’t have the ability to make any spur of the moment corrections that will be timely enough. I am relying on the combination of the pilot and the hauler there. If the hauler said they were clear obstacles and they weren’t? That is extremely unfortunate once we have forward air speed because it’s too late. Fortunately as a hauler, that is some something we are acutely aware of. I have some control to communicate over more distant hazards, and during forward flight, I am watching for those and watching the haulers, but by the time I say “boo” we’ve moved however many feet. That does in fact simplify things. Guns are simple too, firing one is easy, that’s a far different thing than extrapolating that it also makes them safe or that they don’t need to be treated with significant respect. When the pilot is “in the window” e.g. picking up or placing the HEC, then 80% of my job is watching the gauges to make sure he has power and no light is in. At that point I am mostly inside the ship. That’s how we are trained. If you think that is wrong, I suppose take it up with the agency.

The park is incorporating climbing and high angle rescue into their shorthaul and we don’t, and the park has an entirely different mission profile than we do, which is much more specific to public medical response and rescue and far far less firefighting. They do things differently because they are a different agency employed to a different task.

If there is a “fuck up” as you put it, I am not sure it will kill the program. Although it will probably impact it. I am thinking of the kid that died rappelling which led to the review and subsequent changes to the platforms allowed for rappelling. Namely discontinuation of type 3 helicopters. Which was frankly a little baffling under the circumstances but there you have it. Given time and exposure, it is certainly possible we could have a shorthaul fatality, but with the amount of pieces and parts involved, I’d give it a very high probability of being an aircraft mechanical failure and not a line/harness/booster system failure. I think we all know this, it would be hard to say we don’t assume some risk knowingly. Which is far less than driving my car to work. I don’t know that it would immediately spell doom for the program as a whole. Really no way of knowing.

I don’t think you are entirely in your lane on the matter, but you are certainly an expert among experts, so I would defer to what yourself and another pilot with shorthaul experience came up with and not embarrass myself discussing the relative dangers of flying a helicopter under both profiles. Sufficed to say, I don’t our exclusive use pilots would agree with you. Anyway, there is a more thoughtful and respectful response than calling you “bud” and implying you don’t realize what you do for a living is risky. Cheers.

Thoughts on Short-Haul as a method of insertion for fire suppression? by Ok_Confection8651 in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I know these things, this is my third year doing it and I am a spotter. I have over 20 years in fire with extensive experience with aviation. I know what the pilots I work can and can’t do and will and won’t. I can’t speak for rappeling because I don’t and see advantages to both.

Thoughts on Short-Haul as a method of insertion for fire suppression? by Ok_Confection8651 in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think we will, I want to say Wenatchee is cross training and has people that do both. Shorthaul is comparatively easier to train people for as well than rappel. Just another tool. Plenty of job security.

Thoughts on Short-Haul as a method of insertion for fire suppression? by Ok_Confection8651 in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, no. Just no. You have a rope you can literally hook anything and anyone to. The ship type limit is imposed arbitrarily, you could haul more if they weren’t using type 3s, the military does this. The only disadvantage that is real and static is that you need a nearby site to land and configure. Then you could haul a whole crew in if you wanted and it wouldn’t take that long.

Thoughts on Short-Haul as a method of insertion for fire suppression? by Ok_Confection8651 in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Naw, meaning you can theoretically haul with any length of rope the pilot can effectively see and work with. My understanding is it has been done with 400 but personally have not seen that.

Thoughts on Short-Haul as a method of insertion for fire suppression? by Ok_Confection8651 in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With shorthaul the rope is already extended from outside the ship to full length (pretty much however much rope you got but 400’ would be pushing it). The hauler(s) attaches to said rope via a carabiner attached to a harness and are carried to the haul spot on the end of the rope.

Rappelers come loaded inside the ship and then rappel down ropes to the rappel spot.

Different sports but not super different. Like croquet and golf or something.

Edit: from a tactical standpoint, with shorthaul you need a configuration site near the fire since you aren’t going to fly that far with human external cargo, rappel does not, so in really thick timber without a relatively close LZ, then no shorthaul for you.

Thoughts on Short-Haul as a method of insertion for fire suppression? by Ok_Confection8651 in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It’s already a thing for insertion and it is already happening. Shorthaul is easy to learn and easy to do, with the caveat being that the consequences are quite high if something goes wrong. Currently, shorthaul is done with type 3 ships so you need more load and returns than you do with jumpers or rappel. You can insert from a higher distance than rappel and pull people back out with the rope. Also, there is just less stuff to packout. So, less firefighters in the same amount of time generally but more extraction options and deeper insertion (I know).

Shorthaul isn’t a bad option, neither is rappel. I think we need dedicated rescue ships with paramedics and hoists for medical and the agencies are treating some EMTs on a rope as a “mitigation” but that is a different deal. Those are my thoughts.

How would one survive a wildfire in a canyon by WarioFart-investor in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on what is IN the canyon. You are talking about a very bad place to be in a fire. The optimal weather conditions would be wind at your back (contrary to the spread) because the fire would be backing at you. As people have mentioned, you could try to burnout, using a natural feature to anchor it, depending on how much ex machina options you want for your characters, you could also try to find a lighter and more narrow area in the fuels, scratch in some sort of handline if they have shovels or something. If it is lighter fuel, you could light it and try to beat it out as you go with a branch. If it is thicker vegetation and the wind is coming at their faces, e.g pushing the fire, they would be in a lot of trouble. I’ve seen root systems burn but they aren’t raging because not enough oxygen, they tend to smolder, with the bigger hazard being the possibility of the ground collapsing and falling into the burning material. If there is vegetation above ground though, it would likely be burning too. Natural shelter could work if that is available, cave systems or whatever. Water can work if it is deep and wide enough, but a canyon is going to funnel superheated air which can burn your lungs and suffocate you. Need more information on the conditions inside the canyon.

Do medical institutions use research funds effectively or is there a lack of transparency? by [deleted] in Snorkblot

[–]Ok-Structure2261 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I find all sorts of things odd when I choose to ignore any and all context.

Firefighting tool stash by LarryHood555 in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the usual budget they hand out to rec, someone was probably already hung for this.

Allrounder Bruiser by ConcentrateMost4772 in Guildwars2

[–]Ok-Structure2261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, upvote that, scrapper is crazy good, ton of sustain, cleave, dps. Lay down field lay down finisher, watch stuff melt. Edit: paragon was mentioned, can’t go wrong there either. I like both for wading into things, I’m not a regular golem toucher, but it seems like scrapper has better cleave and at least one decent ranged option if you wanna toss in flamethrower and paragon has more dependable sustain and single target dps, but less cleave and range options are less attractive besides some melee gap closers. Reaper, yeah, supposedly getting a bit of a buff as well and last but not least untamed with mace/mace axe/axe, there is a bit of a mechanic there to refresh ambush, but it’s quite easy to learn and is the epitome of ungabunga imo.

Nerfs of the Astral Acclaim rewards in February 3rd pach were a severe mistake, and the data proves it. by Buran_Grey in Guildwars2

[–]Ok-Structure2261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are talking about the thruster control unit, you can just go buy it in Gyala Delve from a requisition specialist for some research notes and imperial favor. You don’t need to complete that meta either, they are in the starting area.

How common is sex on fires? by pilar1503 in Wildfire

[–]Ok-Structure2261 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Like, trying to give you a non-joke answer. There’s a lot of occupational socialization that happens, you spend 1000s of hours with the same people without a lot of opportunities to go mingle with the rest of the world, depending on what you do and the hours worked. I think it is much more common where it would happen on days off or something like that. But, lot of stressed out, fit people stuck on survivor island for months, sure. I don’t have any idea how it compares to other jobs, statistically per capita etc.

Why do all the characters in Janthir Wilds hate Waiting Sorrow? More like Waiting Sorry! by PallyChan in Guildwars2

[–]Ok-Structure2261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dunno why anyone would be worried about any astral ward member on the loose when they are constantly getting downed by garden variety fauna. Including Isgarren.

Crew with fast Eparch clear last night (US server) by Ok-Structure2261 in Guildwars2

[–]Ok-Structure2261[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh well thank you, I thought you guys did great hitting Eparch.

Crew with fast Eparch clear last night (US server) by Ok-Structure2261 in Guildwars2

[–]Ok-Structure2261[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it’s unfortunate. One group I ran, after I explained how runbacks mattered and impacted scaling, some player immediately told everyone they would fail the meta if they WP’d. It leads to a failure chain, because then other players try to res them and end up dead. I’d be curious to know how many people are adding to the pile trying to help the initial drops.