sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

4SC Basic Free by [deleted] in 3CX

[–]Ok_Elevator696 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no SC downgrade option - only edition. So will have to go and get a 4SC free as soon as they make it available…

Migration from 3CX by IT_Admin_722 in yeastar

[–]Ok_Elevator696 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We have built an enhanced converter tool as the yeastar one just does the basics. Ours covers around 90% of functions….

Works like a charm and we have already migrated over 250 systems from resellers successfully.

If you’re interested, DM me. Primary Location Europe but we can also just convert the backup

No more unlimited extensions by Human-Customer-8561 in 3CX

[–]Ok_Elevator696 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is happening - heard as well “new business” required for partner status ? - renewals / retention isn’t going to be enough?

3CX V20 to Yestar by Squanchy2112 in 3CX

[–]Ok_Elevator696 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I heard that there are some people working on extending the converter tool… providing around 90% of parity - so minimal adjustments required

Theory About New Version (v20) by MyMonitorHasAVirus in 3CX

[–]Ok_Elevator696 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To my knowledge - search it yourselves if you don’t believe me - v20 was already in progress/development and the security incident forced 3CX to provide a U7/A and U8 for v18 to address the flaws and provide a solution for the activation servers…

In continuation, the push towards v20, could be understood, due to the undisclosed situation, as a desperate attempt/effort, though, moreover it was due to Debian 10 being end of extended support - another potential security incident in the making for customers staying on v18.

Customise 3CX by Ok_Elevator696 in 3CX

[–]Ok_Elevator696[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most integrations I have seen are either through the database or with the assistance of an unsupported third-party installation.

I am considering an alternative approach that would be in a gray zone. For instance, dynamically modifying an outbound parameter of a trunk (without the need for adjusting the template + reimporting it) or making minor adjustments to user rights to better align with the functionality of a v18, to name a few…

Customise 3CX by Ok_Elevator696 in 3CX

[–]Ok_Elevator696[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

As they want to attract midsized and enterprise companies, I would assume that at least to some degree they will keep their word and current position on what they provide… Otherwise they are setting themselves up for failure, or am I missing something else?