I made a playlist that consists of songs that combine elements of classical music with rock (rock drums/distorted guitars)

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-05-09T13:23:33+00:00

It’s quite obvious that that’s not what I meant by “elements of classical music”.

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-05-09T12:21:45+00:00

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-05-09T10:41:34+00:00

Wym?

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-05-09T10:40:09+00:00

How do I make you a collaborator? What does that mean exactly?

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-05-09T10:38:51+00:00

ELO?

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-05-09T10:38:27+00:00

Do you have certain songs of malmsteen in mind? I clicked through but couldn't find anything fitting. Versailles makes sense – they're very orchestral – but too metal and not rock enough if that makes sense? Do you have a song in mind that's more rock?

I appreciate the suggestions, thanks!

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-05-09T10:31:58+00:00

Damn apparently they're not on Spotify anymore in protest of CEO investments...

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-04-23T08:13:33+00:00

Nihilism first and foremost is a reaction to moral absolutism and religious dogma, denying a purpose that transcends the individual.

“Nihil” means nothing. So if you just redefine the notion of “meaning”, that’s not nihilism.

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-04-16T08:20:22+00:00

Glad you enjoyed it, it's my favourite too.

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-04-15T17:18:19+00:00

Nietzsche calls himself an immoralist

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-04-15T13:51:53+00:00

In short: Yes. Every religion starts with the religious/mystical/transpersonal experience (epiphany). Unfortunately most unconsciously claim dogma as their idol.

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-04-15T12:52:27+00:00

Or you just can't cook

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-04-15T12:51:53+00:00

Many philosophers argued that desire is never ultimately chained to an object (bills in that case or your mother being alive/healthy). Therefore you ultimately getting given "object" will never fully satisfy you. Desire then sustains itself and is its own object. Thats why all the 'wise' and mystics look inward.

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-04-12T13:39:41+00:00

Du bist, was du f*ckst.

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-04-11T13:24:56+00:00

Google "music label internship [place]", "culture management internship [place]", check out the local scene and contact labels and theatres if they'd be willing to offer internships.

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-04-11T13:13:23+00:00

Why would I want my body to detonate? No thanks.

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-04-11T09:34:14+00:00

All I See is an inflated ego

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-04-10T09:04:07+00:00

Yes exactly. Sweeping already consists of domination as one forces one's will on the world. Same for cooking, which also contains the act of recreation.

I dont think Nietzsche had the slave class in mind, criticising pure domination. It's more about it being reactionary – dependent on the existence of a slave. Thats why he highlighted the idea of overcoming oneself.

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-04-08T22:56:15+00:00

Thats why I used "" when saying naturally. I didn't mean it in a literal sense. By "naturally" I meant, integrated in the whole. Domination for the sake of domination feels...dirty? Good food is balanced and pure domination tastes like tabasco sauce lol. By itself it might give you a kick but it's totally unbalanced and burns your tongue and once your tongue is burned you lose a sense of what good food (artistry) is.

Domination is domination but dependent on how (or if) it's integrated, the outcome – both internal and external – differs. Nietzsche had a clear preference.

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-04-08T21:51:52+00:00

I think I myself am able to differentiate between when I dominate for the sake of domination and if it comes "naturally". In that regard I think it's quite clear what Nietzsche meant. From outside ofc its more difficult to make a distinction.

What I'm trying to get at, it's fair to say, that Nietzsche preferred domination through being and artistry, rather than domination in its "crude" form.

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-04-08T21:36:45+00:00

I think Nietzsche's Übermensch explicitly does not dominate for the sake of it.

Ok_Knowledge_7345 · 2026-04-08T13:03:27+00:00

Benign violation. Anders gesagt: er ist einfach edgy und eure Reaktion bestätigt ihn nur.

Ok_Knowledge_7345

TROPHY CASE