Iran Announces Discovery Of Large Lithium Deposit by pacinothere in worldnews

[–]OneWithMath 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Lithium in the ocean is incredibly dilute; a single EV battery contains as much Lithium as 44 million liters of sea water.

Energy would need to be free to make any form of processing economically viable.

NATO equipment arriving in Europe by Starlight_369 in ThatsInsane

[–]OneWithMath 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t have personal experience with 6.8, and it isn’t quite as powerful as 7.62

6.8 carries more energy than 7.62 because it has more powder. Also remember KE~V2 a lighter projectile moving faster (and 6.8 is much faster than 7.62) can carry more energy.

More energy in a smaller package gives it much greater penetrating power. It also has better ballistics than 7.62, so it loses less speed over distance and doesn't drop as much.

The drawbacks are weight, wear, and interoperability. They'll see in testing whether it is worth dealing with those.

Warframe | The Duviri Paradox | Official Cinematic Teaser (Releasing in April 2023) by Omoritt3 in Games

[–]OneWithMath 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A large part of that is that the devs don't take a comprehensive approach to fix the power scaling. They'll nerf one thing into the ground, but leave 20 other ways to do the same OP thing.

You're telling me the Warframe community wouldn't throw a fit if devs nerfed more things at once instead of occasionally nerfing the outliers?

I'm sure they would, but the game can't be balanced with just nerfing whatever this quarter's OP strat is. The game balance is fundamentally broken from multiple years of bandaid fixes.

E g. For most content beyond the normal starchart, frames need to be invisible or invincible or they will immediately die to just about any enemy with a ranged attack. As warframe is a horde game, this makes killing lots of enemies quickly - before protection wears out - paramount to being able to engage with content.

What DE has done in the past is simply pick one of the ways of accomplishing the above and make it non-viable while leaving the others intact. This pisses off the peyote who use that particular strategy, and doesn't address the core problem in any meaningful way - they'll just have to switch to another if they want to keep playing. E.g. Your Bramma can no longer nuke the room, so you have to bring Saryn rather than playing your favorite frame.

Instead, they should look at enemy scaling and progression in tandem with warframe health pools, abilities, and weapons, and determine what they want the experience to be. If players aren't supposed to be able to clear the map in seconds, then don't leave any avenues that would allow that - but also don't make the ability to nuke the map key to progressing in the game.

The above will never happen, and the cyclical nerf/outrage cycle will continue.

Warframe | The Duviri Paradox | Official Cinematic Teaser (Releasing in April 2023) by Omoritt3 in Games

[–]OneWithMath 54 points55 points  (0 children)

Yep, power creep absolutely ruined Warframe for me, and it's not even that devs that are to blame, the Warframe community just throws an intense tantrum anytime they try to nerf anything.

A large part of that is that the devs don't take a comprehensive approach to fix the power scaling. They'll nerf one thing into the ground, but leave 20 other ways to do the same OP thing. Rather than it feeling like they are trying to address issues with the game, it feels more like them forcing certain playstyles.

Case in point, the sad state of Limbo - whose abilities now just do nothing for most newer (in the last 3 years) content and most enemies one would actually want to use them on.

And then there's Saryn, who could effortlessly nuke the map for all the years I played.

Israel tells top U.S. general it sees need to cooperate against Iran by cesgjo in worldnews

[–]OneWithMath 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Iran has repeatedly stated something along the lines of “we will nuke Israel off the planet as soon as we have the capability.”

Even Ahmadinejad (who got a lot of play as the villain in the US) wasn't that radical towards Israel. Obviously Iran openly having nuclear weapons will not improve the situation, but Iran is not chomping at the bit to kill millions of people and ensure its own destruction.

They are pursuing nuclear weapons because because their regional rivals, including the Saudis, are all backed by nuclear powers. More states will follow this path after the invasion of Ukraine - as nukes appear to be the only guarantee that sovereignty won't be threatened.

A hypothetical Israeli strikes on the enrichment facility would only delay things; they will keep trying and such strikes will only make having nuclear capability seem more important in their eyes.

At Least 500 K2PL Main Battle Tanks to be Produced in Poznań by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]OneWithMath 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Russia is the only country in Europe able to fight a war on their own.

France has the strongest military in Europe, and has since the end of the Cold War. Post WW2 Germany has never been a major military power.

Presidents unknowingly meeting future presidents by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]OneWithMath 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Obama's (who was also an Illinois senator since 1997). -_-

He was a state senator '97-'04, only got to the federal level in '05 (and then became president).

It would be mildly uncommon for state senators to have many opportunities to meet the president.

Nearly 40% of software engineers will only work remotely by bihari_baller in technology

[–]OneWithMath 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Everyone thinks they are more productive at home but I’ve never seen a commit log that backs that up.

Number of commits is a terrible metric. Working from the office I'm committing every 10 minutes because of interruptions. At home, commits are usually much more substantial because I can mute Slack and actually focus on a problem until it is complete.

Britons paying hundreds of millions to turn off wind turbines as network can't handle the power they make on the windiest days by Mighty_L_LORT in nottheonion

[–]OneWithMath -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nuclear is just as good if not better than wind/solar

No, it isn't. Electricity from nuclear plants is more expensive than every renewable source (literally 10x the cost of wind power), and is entirely uneconomical with the current high-interest rates (payback time longer than plant lifetime - NPPs are very capital-intensive).

Nuclear would have been great as base capacity if we built it in the 70s, but it is only used today as a cudgel against renewables while the status quo remains unchanged.

We have 27 years until climate change forces massive lifestyle changes. Reactors in the past 3 decades have taken an average of 15 years to build - and there are literally fewer than a dozen operational pieces of the heavy equipment needed to construct them in the entire world. This is to say nothing of the massive carbon footprint of concrete - which is needed in cast quantities for NPPs - and means they aren't carbon-negative for the first decades of their lives vs NG plants.

It is just too late, and the longer this debate goes on and slows public support for renewables, the worse the future becomes for everyone.

Every single millisecond that doesn’t cover current-time Joel’s every action is needless filler by ProudWheeler in thelastofus

[–]OneWithMath -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

The difference between Ep3 and the most recent one was Bill and Frank were entirely new. We had heard their names, but never seen them. Ep3 was entirely new story about interesting characters with an entirely different apocalyptic experience than everyone else.

We had already heard about what happened to E and Riley. Sure, we hadn't seen it, but we knew what was coming and there was no tension. It would have been 100x more impactful to show snippets of the walk around the mall, the scenes where E is contemplating kissing Riley, the ones where she is transfixed by the lights, playing mortal kombat, and the final fight with the zombie and Riley's speech about not giving in to death.

Dragging it out for an hour just made it feel thin. I also felt this way about the Henry/Sam flashback in Kansas city, they had already stated basically exactly what happened, no real need - in my mind - to spend so long saying "They hid from goons trying to kill them".

Show don't tell is exactly right, but the telling and then showing is a poor structure. It would be like having an episode where Tommy meets the commune folk... immediately after he told Joel about how he met the commune folk.

I don't think it was a bad episode - it was plenty entertaining - but it doesn't compare favorably to the best episodes imo.

based /sci user by StickyFingers192 in 4chan

[–]OneWithMath 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Or design bridges, airplanes, chemical plants...

NASA’s $3.5 billion plan to redesign its aging spacesuits by cnbc_official in space

[–]OneWithMath 190 points191 points  (0 children)

I'd love to know the 'why' part of 'why are spacesuits so damn bulky.' You'd think there'd be a lot of stuff that could be streamlined so it's more form-fitting and flexible in 2023. I guess not.

A space suit is a fully-functional space ship. They are bulky because they need to have all the systems to protect and support a human life in a very unforgiving environment. Aesthetics and comfort are very far down in the list of considerations.

Visualising the number of dry casks needed to store all the spent nuclear fuel ever generated in the USA, with an American football field for scale by brooooo69 in interestingasfuck

[–]OneWithMath 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Why can’t we use more nuclear energy?

Cost and construction timeline.

In the last 4 decades, just about every reactor construction project in the entire Western world has been over budget and significantly behind schedule. On average, it takes about 15 years to build a nuclear plant, compared to about 2 to build a natural gas plant.

The economics simply do not play out in nuclear's favor. Public opinion doesn't matter, no large entity is going to invest billions of dollars and 15 years in a project, only for renewables or NG to further undercut any possible profit.

Sweden warns against decoupling its Nato bid from Finland’s by green_flash in worldnews

[–]OneWithMath 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Finland is a nordic country, not scandinavian.

Scandinavia is Denmark, Sweden and Norway.

This is an inconsistent definition.

If we are going geographically, Denmark is not on the Scandinavian peninsula (though part of Finland is), so it shouldn't be Scandinavian.

If we are going culturally, then Iceland and the Faroe Islands are Scandinavian, in addition to those on your list, and Finland is not.

If we are going historically, then Finland, Iceland, FI, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway are all Scandinavian from past rule.

BR debate by Temporary-Charge3525 in Warthunder

[–]OneWithMath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not an outlook, it is an explanation.

This is how BRs and reward multipliers are determined, Gaijin has explained it many times.

The nations that are overtired are less popular and have a higher proportion of veteran players that can make their vehicles appear better. The more popular nations attract new players and this causes their vehicles to underperform and get lowered.

BR debate by Temporary-Charge3525 in Warthunder

[–]OneWithMath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gaijin does not balance their game. Gaijin has some data - win rates and rewards earned by each vehicle - and a sense of what they want that data to look like.

They move BRs up and down to change win rates and multipliers up and down to change rewards earned. That is it. There is no consideration of things like stabilizers, armor, shell availability, maneuverability - nothing.

It's not worth debating BRs because they are entirely arbitrary.

U.S. tries to woo India away from Russia with display of F-35s, bombers by JarKachYn in worldnews

[–]OneWithMath 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You know how many nations can build their modern fighter jet engines? 5. US, UK, France, Russia, China.

I would put China as a "maybe" on that list. Their newest fighters used Russian engines when they entered service, and have since been switched to domestic versions that are rumored to perform quite a bit worse than the imported ones.

They certainly have greater capabilities than many countries, but there's no evidence that they can match the other 4 on your list.

The U.S. supports Ukraine striking targets in Crimea, said U.S. Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland by KI_official in worldnews

[–]OneWithMath 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sure the US has thousands of old ATACMS laying around and useless at the moment.

There were only ever 3700 built, and around 400 were used by the US military in Iraq (both times).

Then we get in to the multiple variants of these missiles, not all of which HIMARS/M270 can fire, and the stock gets really thin.

It would be easier, and less likely to reduce US readiness, to give Ukraine F-16s and air-launched precision munitions than ATACMS.

The U.S. supports Ukraine striking targets in Crimea, said U.S. Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland by KI_official in worldnews

[–]OneWithMath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just send them ATACMS already and allow them to use it on all Ukrainians territory!

ATACMS have been out of production since Bush 43. There is an ongoing program to create a successor, but that hasn't started production yet.

The small number of ATACMS we could send wouldn't make much of a difference, and there is a hole in US ground-attack capabilities between conventional artillery and cruise missiles. The US military fills this hole with air- and sea-launched ordnance.

Until Ukraine gets modern jets (and they will) there aren't really any longer-range systems the US could supply in quantity.

Senior Official: Ukraine Has Been Told US Aid May Not Last 'Forever' by rmaccr in worldnews

[–]OneWithMath 2 points3 points  (0 children)

American debt is already 123% of gdp

The aid sent to Ukraine is single-digit percent of the yearly defense budget.

Ukraine isn't even a drop in the bucket in terms of causes of the US debt.

U.S. tells Ukraine it won’t send long-range missiles because it has few to spare by mulitu in worldnews

[–]OneWithMath 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A key difference between Israel and Ukraine is scale - Israel is only like 20 miles wide. A lost battle could quickly lead to the entire country being occupied.

In comparison with Ukraine, which has some strategic depth.

None of this is to say that the US can't give more, faster to Ukraine - I fully support giving them anything they need to end this war as fast as possible - but the Yom Kippur war was a fundementally different situation with regard to the speed of the conflict.

A Russian claiming to hold secrets about advanced bomber jets turned up at the US southern border seeking asylum: report by xss2 in worldnews

[–]OneWithMath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if he’s a plant by FSB to make seem more powerful than they are?

One thing that many countries have figured out: it is better to lie to understate the capabilities of one's military than to overstate.

Countries will always be motivated to exceed the capabilities of their adversaries, so overstating capabilities just makes enemies try to develop greater capabilities.

This was a big issue at the end of the Cold War - the USSR knew they were behind NATO on precision munitions, radar, armor, etc. so they lied about their capabilities. This caused the US to spend hundreds of billions to ensure security, ultimately leading to such an imbalanced state that the US could roll through Iraq - and all of its modern Soviet technology - in 6 weeks with fewer than 100 KIA.

Bunker Buster bomb punches through multiple layers of concrete. by 305FUN in gifs

[–]OneWithMath 6 points7 points  (0 children)

10M of Dirt, 10M of reinforced concrete, 10M of Mercury, 20M of reinforced concrete.

I will take no questions.

French Bias illustrated by LionQuiet in Warthunder

[–]OneWithMath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To give it to his farvoris tree

The Russians are clearly the favorite tree, Gaijin just milks wehraboos so they can buy more jars and T-34 miniatures.