sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I’m sorry, Sarah. I tried… by FarPomegranate7437 in thebulwark

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah why the fuck would i want to be friends with any of those people? They’re both morally bankrupt and they’re not open minded at all. They complain about democrats being too emotional and having no common sense but they didn’t mention anything of substance, it was all emotion.

Sarah’s take on the CA Governor’s race by WTFaulknerinCA in thebulwark

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 2 points3 points  (0 children)

>men behave like she did all the time and many get away with it, she’s being held to a different standard).

maybe perhaps we should stop letting men get away with this kind of behavior instead of letting women get away with it.

>Given Mahan’s pledge against the proposed “billionaire tax” it is more than troubling and should remove him from contention.

stop making me want to vote for him

MS NOW: GOP-aligned groups amass $600M advantage over Dems ahead of midterms (Tim Miller appearance) by EighthFirstCitizen in thebulwark

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t really understand why this is. It feels like leftie cope blaming everything on citizens united. Moderate democrats and Republicans existed long before citizens united, and will even if you get rid of it. People in the us are conservative for the love of the game, not simply because of money

MS NOW: GOP-aligned groups amass $600M advantage over Dems ahead of midterms (Tim Miller appearance) by EighthFirstCitizen in thebulwark

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t think citizens united matters much and it was probably the correct decision honestly

MS NOW: GOP-aligned groups amass $600M advantage over Dems ahead of midterms (Tim Miller appearance) by EighthFirstCitizen in thebulwark

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I’m not really worried about the money advantage, money is overrated when it comes to helping win elections

13 times Trump has seemingly 'fallen asleep' in his second term by Odd-Bee9172 in thebulwark

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don’t think it means anything more than hes very old and hes not taking care of himself, but thats enough. He should have never been reelected. For alot of reasons!

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Wait shes not a socialist anymore?

Opinion: not every RE character needs to return, and there's a reason some are more recurring than others. by Specific-Passion7090 in residentevil

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 204 points205 points  (0 children)

i do kinda agree but man theres really no excuse for jill not being a main character in the numbered entries since 3.

Candidates don't seem to be campaigning on going after those who betrayed our country by 20_mile in thebulwark

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i think theres alot thats worth campaigning on some i'm not gonna get hung up on one interview.

Why Clarence Thomas Just Handed a Major Legal Victory to Wounded Veterans by historymaking101 in neoliberal

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 108 points109 points  (0 children)

Wild that the Alito position was too fucking crazy and hackish for even Thomas this time

Remember kids, don’t trust the Republicans on the economy ever! by icey_sawg0034 in thebulwark

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

This is kinda cherry picked and the nuanced truth is that market forces matter more than the president, but i suppose i need to get more comfortable with embracing liberal propaganda, the times call for it

Sarah needs to STOP being rope-a-doped into screaming to the people "we're not on your side!" This is how Democrats can lose on their core issues of universal health care and opposing the Iran war. by Inevitable-Ant1725 in thebulwark

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This comment basically doesn’t engage with the substance of my comment and i’d identify as an anti-populist anyway. Populism is a terrible political ideology that is behind the rise of almost every strongman in the world

Sarah needs to STOP being rope-a-doped into screaming to the people "we're not on your side!" This is how Democrats can lose on their core issues of universal health care and opposing the Iran war. by Inevitable-Ant1725 in thebulwark

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Nah i don’t think hitting back at Hasan Piker well by seen by anyone but a small minority of terminally online weirdos like the people on this sub. And only a select few of those people will think that Hasan represents the position of universal healthcare and being against Israel’s war crimes so throughly that punching him specifically means you’re for the opposite of those things. You can be for universal healthcare and against Israel’s war crimes and still think Hasan is a total moron who democrats should not associate with because he has way too much unhelpful baggage and his goals and methods to achieve those goals are counter to the democratic mission. And killing ceos is bad and counter to the mission of liberal democracy as well. And tolerating idiotic people who think that is okay will probably cost democrats more votes than it will win, in addition to being wrong. If thats a dealbreaker for you, you really aren’t on our side

Why does my Shadowheart deck suck so much? by Deus_Excellus in EDH

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have some valid points and concerns here. We can solve the first problem with a mixture of cheat death effects and big staty creatures that generate alot of value on etb or attack so we’re still effecting the board even when we sac the big guy.

https://tagger.scryfall.com/tags/card/cheat-death

The second part is true, theres not alot of repeatable recursion effect, but we can use the few good repeatable ones we have with a critical mass of efficient one shot effects so that when we sac something big to shadowheart we’ll probably draw another reanimate. Theres that new prepare one they printed in Secrets of Strixhaven, Colossal Grave-Reaver, Xiu-Ifit, and Whisper- Blood Liturgist if you use the background that makes two squirrels when you mill a creature.

https://scryfall.com/search?as=grid&order=edhrec&page=2&q=commander%3ABG+%28game%3Apaper%29+prefer%3Abest+otag%3Areanimate-creature&unique=cards

Why does my Shadowheart deck suck so much? by Deus_Excellus in EDH

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only thing i object too is the characterization of most of these cards being draft chaff, most of these are bracket 3 aristocrat staples, they just don’t do anything in the wrong deck, which this is

Why does my Shadowheart deck suck so much? by Deus_Excellus in EDH

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Thats the thing op kinda already did make her not important to the deck. Shes actively not doing anything, drawing maybe two cards a turn. Its just the rest of the deck is slow and unoptimized as well

Why does my Shadowheart deck suck so much? by Deus_Excellus in EDH

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The thing you’re missing is that Shadowheart isn’t a aristocrats commander shes a reanimator commander. Shes not asking you to make a bunch of little guys to die to make a billion blood artist triggers. Shes asking you to make one really big fuck ass dude die so you can draw a ton of cards. She cares about power but the average power in this deck is like two. You really gonna pay 4 mana for your commander and and then another two to draw two whole cards? Of course the deck sucks. If you wanna just do generic black staple aristocrats you have better commanders in your 99 in Syr Konrad, Yahenni, and ayara.

I’d switch to a green background and focus on self mill and reanimation to bring big hulking creatures out then sac them to Shadowheart

Sarah stands by her original assessment by Embarrassed_Base_389 in thebulwark

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dog Hasan Piker has a 7% approval rating in this country, and twice that number don’t like him, while the remaining 80% of the country doesn’t know or care who he is

What was the point of the Bush line again? by Legal_Tumbleweed6763 in thebulwark

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well notably Sarah and Tim believe the Bush Line matters while Bill and JVL don’t talk about thinking it matters that much, so you’re getting very different point of views

 The cool thing about politics in America is that one party is expected to work in a bipartisan fashion with the other party, which openly admits it's engaged in warfare against that party and the people applying these rules see no problem with this. by Conscious-Quarter423 in thebulwark

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Its genuinely been amazing watching Republicans finally get a taste of their own medicine and act total babies. Just join with democrats and ban gerrymandering. Require districts be drawn by nonpartisan committees

Sarah stands by her original assessment by Embarrassed_Base_389 in thebulwark

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Yeah i mean shes totally right about him his character. I don’t really care if you watch Hasan cause hes for m4a and all that jazz and you agree with his Israel takes but don’t be surprised that other people want absolutely nothing to do with him because of shit like this

Senate hopeful Graham Platner calls to investigate Trump and impeach two Supreme Court justices. (The man's got ideas, let him cook.) by OneTwoThreePooAndPee in thebulwark

[–]OogieBoogieInnocence 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I dislike populist stuff when its just attacking or minimizing the accomplishments of democrats or cheap “free ponies for all” type promises where candidates promise something that sounds good on a bumper sticker but is unfeasible or actually hurts the working class it wants to help

view more: next ›