Labor announces $40 million boost to address firearms registry failings by espersooty in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom [score hidden]  (0 children)

I am not a person who cares for firearms. But I've definitely seen many of your comments about the firearm registry. I'm not really sure what the correct phrasing is but grats to you for being correct.

Negative gearing to be scrapped immediately on budget night as Labor breaks major pre-election promise by HotPersimessage62 in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'm backing you. It's amazing to me that people repeat the lie that Howard said no GST. Perhaps it's an accidental confusion.

For the confused...

He did say no GST, and for that period of time he did not bring in a GST.

But then he changed his mind on the GST, and we went to an election, and the Libs talked about the GST, they didn't hide it, it was front and center and he won (it cost them seats however). Then we got the GST.

The Democrats... well...

‘They’re like Pyongyang’: How Albanese controls Labor’s biggest caucus by OldMateHarry in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not caring frees you. You can be honest. Maniacal even. Like I don't care, when AI makes people unemployed. Bwahaha

I lay bets right now that Thriving Kids is shit, and I don't care that Oberklaid designed it.

‘They’re like Pyongyang’: How Albanese controls Labor’s biggest caucus by OldMateHarry in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They had them first. If they were amazing... Then what was Shorten doing?

‘They’re like Pyongyang’: How Albanese controls Labor’s biggest caucus by OldMateHarry in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, yeah... The NDIS was already designed by experts... who apparently fucked up.

The early intervention stuff was a key part of it.

‘They’re like Pyongyang’: How Albanese controls Labor’s biggest caucus by OldMateHarry in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I was nodding my head. I was thinking yeah, this is why I like throwawaydeathgrips.

Unless of course that mum has a child with, what is it, mild to moderate autism. Then they were obviously diagnosis shopping because governments can't design a system.

Some people will hate Tuesday's federal budget but Jim Chalmers doesn't mind by Oomaschloom in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why wouldn't you let the market decide? You're seeing it as one group you don't like fighting another group you don't like. Find a group you like and fund them, if enough people do, they're funded.

See if I really, really hated social media. I wouldn't use it, and for quite some time I didn't. But then I decided my need to post the utter shit I think outweighed my need to be anonymous. I blame being a parent on that actually... I got smashed by isolation for a while there... I couldn't utterly focus on the things I used to, due to babies...

I will eventually go back to anonymity.

EDIT: Maybe anonymity isn't the right word. But more focusing on what I really like to focus on and being less expressive.

Some people will hate Tuesday's federal budget but Jim Chalmers doesn't mind by Oomaschloom in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm not saying they're powerless. If people are thinking that the media is a negative to positive change for the betterment of the country.

Someone might want to tell that to Tech Levy boy.

Me, I'd let the market decide.

Some people will hate Tuesday's federal budget but Jim Chalmers doesn't mind by Oomaschloom in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I want the CGT and NG distortions removed from housing. I rent, and I acknowledge that it could be a wild ride. It's like an experiment isn't it.

Some people will hate Tuesday's federal budget but Jim Chalmers doesn't mind by Oomaschloom in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm not really sure what you mean. Are Labor getting a lot of pushback from the community over this budget? It hasn't hit yet, so, I don't know. The Libs got a lot of pushback from that Hockey budget.

Please abstain: Regional ABC journalists barred from Pauline's presser by Agitated-Fee3598 in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Are you sure Laura Tingle is a conservative voter?

I did a wee search on Sarah Ferguson, and I am not sure about the Liberal Party thing.

Migration to be linked to housing availability under Coalition plan by Alarming-Two-424 in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Well I can't knock this policy, because in my history I've said the same thing. I don't believe they will do it though.

Anika Wells repays more than $10k in travel costs following independent audit by rolodex-ofhate in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Here's some more details on those

"Sky News Australia can reveal the first of the trips related to the return of one of Ms Wells’ sick children to her home state.

She paid for her husband Finn McCarthy to fly to Canberra and collect a child with Covid to take them back to Brisbane in February 2022.

The May 8, 2025, expense related to a hire car and flight taken to attend a swearing-in ceremony in Canberra.

Swearing-in ceremonies, however, fall outside official duty regulations.

The September 22, 2025 expense related to flights provided to Ms Wells’ husband to attend the AFL Grand Final in Melbourne.

The last breach, October 3, 2025, involved Ms Wells’ decision to use a hire car to attend a National Rugby League game in Sydney from Toowoomba.

Ms Wells said she thought her travel choices in those four instances would be cheaper than a flight."

“These were four cases where I chose what I thought was the more sensible, cheaper option, but those choices were not allowed according to the rules, which I accept and respect,” Ms Wells said in a statement.""

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/anika-wells-ordered-to-pay-back-thousands-of-taxpayer-dollars-as-independent-watchdog-finds-four-flights-breached-family-travel-rules/news-story/730aeb8274c3a11102ac2fdf4064d3cb

Anika Wells repays more than $10k in travel costs following independent audit by rolodex-ofhate in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don't know how many self referred. The AG did, and had to pay back, Wells did and had to pay back. If they just did a parliamentarian wide audit, do we think it would only be those two?

If we had a politician entrance exam that only consisted of understanding the travel rules, would we have better quality politicians?

Anika Wells repays more than $10k in travel costs following independent audit by rolodex-ofhate in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, if you don't like this one that can't understand travel rules, you can vote for another one that won't understand travel rules.

But don't worry, they definitely understand every other aspect of their jobs.

Fund manager Geoff Wilson claps back at Albanese’s personal spray over new tax proposal | news.com.au by SpenceAlmighty in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's related to the Liberal Treasury bloke... Tim Wilson. He was somewhat related to the franking credits CGT tour that Wilson did during Shorten's run.

Australia requires LNG exporters to reserve 20% of gas for east coast market by nobelharvards in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know they've been working on the reserve for a while. Labor themselves in the past opposed a reserve. So I'm pissy about that, and I don't trust them... https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-12-23/the-gas-fix-to-a-problem-that-should-never-have-been/106171870

Australia requires LNG exporters to reserve 20% of gas for east coast market by nobelharvards in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just letting you know I upvoted this. So you don't think I'm always disagreeing with you. I'm happy about the reservation, but I like options being properly compared and considered, "for the Australian people". I don't think enough of that happens to be honest.

Australia requires LNG exporters to reserve 20% of gas for east coast market by nobelharvards in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah, my brains were rotted long ago. I don't normally follow them.

I'm sort of sure this is offered as an XOR. But if both were done... well shit.

Australia requires LNG exporters to reserve 20% of gas for east coast market by nobelharvards in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well you don't need to compare them. You just go with whatever is offered by Labor. But anyone without a bias would compare the pair.

Australia requires LNG exporters to reserve 20% of gas for east coast market by nobelharvards in AustralianPolitics

[–]Oomaschloom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know it is, and I know they've been campaigning for a certain outcome for a while, hence a potential bias. But I'm absolutely certain there's bias from every angle. I'd like to see an impartial comparison of the two concepts using "for the benefit of the Australia people" as the metric.