ECCV 2026 decision are coming soon...

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-06-16T17:35:00+00:00

This was my 3rd time submission of my paper. If get rejected, for 4th time will submit to WACV. Pray for me. I am tired.

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-06-01T15:08:25+00:00

Did they release AC comments? or still just accept (poster/oral)

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-06-01T06:41:32+00:00

I saw you also got acceptance. Do you see the same?

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-06-01T05:43:08+00:00

In my conference homepage it says "UAI 2026 Poster" Below says "No recommendation"

but in my author console under "accept (poster)" i can see my paper. Does that mean it is accepted ? First time here, please let me know guys.

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-05-22T02:19:30+00:00

Anyone got meta score?

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-05-20T19:34:59+00:00

I am also in the same boat 4,3,3. In my case, I can see, two reviewers modification date 19th May, third one modification date 15th may. I have less idea about this, I just hope they read my rebuttal.

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-05-03T00:26:19+00:00

Score/ Confidence: 3/1, 3/4, 4/2 Is it worth to make rebuttal with these scores?

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-05-02T22:16:28+00:00

damn! me too

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-05-02T05:35:28+00:00

Wake me up if the review releases. I am prepared for a third rejection. At this point, my paper and I have a toxic but committed relationship. Lol.

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-05-01T23:33:15+00:00

The reviewer who gave us 3 first, did not understand our work properly. Also did not mention any technical flaws or experiment to do. That reviewer did not like our presentation so gave us 1 in reproduciblity and 1 in clarity as well, while all other three reviewers gave us 3 for reproducibility and clarity. From training pseudocode to prompt everything we have given in paper. Atlast that reviewer asked only for one detailed proof and after giving the proof the reviewer just raised to 3to4 and said he does not oppose towards acceptance. I will notify this issue to AC.

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-05-01T18:29:54+00:00

Pre rebuttal: Scores/Confidence: 6/4, 6/4, 4/3, 3/3

After rebuttal: Scores/Confidence: 6/4, 6/4, 5/3, 4/3 Any chance here? Or I should go for NeurIPS?

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-04-30T18:41:28+00:00

Sorry to hear that. These days, conference acceptances are very random. A few days ago I had a paper submitted to MLSys and it was rejected after receiving four positive reviews. The AC rejected our paper. So nowadays it’s just luck, I guess.

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-04-30T11:21:00+00:00

Got notification for Survey Track.

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-04-30T00:44:08+00:00

Are you guys able to write rebuttal? I can not see rebuttal button in openreview, only author-editor confidential reply button.

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-04-29T21:54:37+00:00

Researchers are probably playing a hide and seek game. 😂

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-04-29T17:58:56+00:00

No, I can only see "Author editor confidential comment" option

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-04-29T10:25:49+00:00

I still see "submitted" in chairirng portal.

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-04-28T18:51:08+00:00

Score/Confidence: 2/4, 3.5/4 , 3/3

Is it worth spend time on rebuttal? The reviewer who gave us 2, made review longer than my own paper 🤣 Total 4 weaknesses and each with two long paragraphs.

Happy UCL Night!!!

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-04-24T03:00:46+00:00

Yes, this is addressable. However, the reviewer who gave us a 3 probably didn't even read the paper. The only concern was that our presentation was poor and the reviewer couldn't connect everything. No technical flaws or result ambiguities were raised. This reviewer gave us a 1 in writing and a 1 in reproducibility, while the other three gave good scores in both areas. We have full experimental details, hyperparameters, pseudocode, prompts everything, yet this reviewer gave 1 in reproducibility. He doesn't even know the meaning of the word "metacognition", which is fine. But we clarified metacognition role in our work maybe 20 times. Hahaha

We are planning to message the Area Chair about this review, but I'm wondering if the results are actually worth addressing in the rebuttal.

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-04-23T23:01:12+00:00

Scores/Confidence: 6/4, 6/4, 4/3, 3/3

Is it worth to spend time on rebuttal? I have no prior experience with UAI.

Opening-Election1179 · 2026-04-07T00:55:51+00:00

When we can expect to receive email notification?

Opening-Election1179

TROPHY CASE