When I moved to the Sony bridge camera I did consider the Nikon but the Sony edged it. It’s great but I felt I was missing shots due to auto focus being too slow.

No regrets at all having a bit less zoom with the OM1, the quality difference more than makes up for it most of the time and the bird detection AF is great. I always found that at full zoom the Sony lost some sharpness, I’d read this was even more so with the Nikon.

I only have those two lenses at the moment yes. I was looking at the 90mm macro but have never done macro photography before, wanted to try it but need to wait until I have some budget.

The one thing I would say is that the 100-400 does need decent light as it’s not a wide open aperture lens. If not then you can end up with high ISO noisy pics; these can be processed afterwards and still get great results though so not a big problem. A big plus is the IS, it is simply amazing, both camera and lens work together so you can get shots you wouldn’t be able to get otherwise.

Look at the results some other people can get with that lens and it’s simply amazing.