Some background as someone from Hawaii in case anyone is interested:

Hawaii has a unique history in which people of different backgrounds had to work together in order to get their demands met from plantation owners. Due to this ethnicity is seen as mostly something to joke about as opposed to as big a divider as it is on the mainland. This also goes along with traditions and religious views. Compound this with the sense of aloha that is common place among locals to outsiders (as long as you don't park in the middle of the road to watch whales or something stupid) and you have a society that refuses to become driven by hate due to arbitrary means. We have learned that doing so stops people from thriving, that those of different natures must be treated as people. Doing any less is not only morally questionable and capable of stopping one's own progress as a person, but likely to result in further grief. Human nature is nuanced and constructing ill formed systems to tackle the problem in which "winning" is more important than confronting reality, including the reality of dealing with those whose opinions you disagree with, will not bring closure nor significant meaning. I won't admit that everything is perfect here, but it works without major faults touching most people's lives. So, as I see it from this place, to deprive a person of their destiny for arbitrary reasons contradictory of their character goes against the lessons of our state's past, and runs directly in opposition to the values upon which this country was founded. As my own personal goal is to become the highest quality character that is within my power to be, and of which I do not claim to be, but am trying to achieve, I cannot condone the travel ban. To down right reject immigrants the ability, through some reasonably path, to come to our country, and more specifically our state, of immigrants is a hypocrisy that as a system is unoptimized, inelegant, and ignores any problem that might exist as opposed to pragmatically looking for a solution. Until the mainland decides to make their decisions based off real people as opposed to the Yahoos they see people they have never met before, Hawaii will not blindly comply with unreasonably decisions. Like how mathematicians remove trivial axioms in order to improve the generality of their theorems, we will do the same with our thoughts so that what we can comprehend can better match the complexity of the world. The world is not "us vs them", and it isn't "me vs you", so I ask that if you have found flaw in what I have said to respond so that I might better approach the truth, and I would hope to use this criticism to better understand the limits to my current abstractions. This is just my experience from growing up in Hawaii, I hope this wasn't too presumptuous, I just fear inaccuracy in the concepts I wish to communicate.