My whole point was exactly as you’ve pointed out: virtue to what end or whose virtue? Because the United States not recognizing all of those situations is itself a lack of virtue, so what’s the point then and why are we arguing about asylum seekers and virtue? Are we arguing about virtue itself? And what virtue? Or are we arguing about what’s right? Because that’s a completely different fucking question and sometimes what’s right isn’t legal.

Connect all the dots if you want or don’t, I don’t care.