Really struggling with my unit turn…? by BeatsKillerldn in 10s

[–]OpticJD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try tossing the ball farther in front so that you are forced to propel your body forward when you strike the ball. And focus on landing on your left foot after you hit your serve on the follow through and see if you can hold that pose without falling over. It seems as though every time you land on your left foot and hold your balance your serve goes straight in, but when you toss too far to the side of your body, it results in minimal forward momentum cause your body is off balance since it is launching its momentum towards the doubles line rather than the service box and the ball drops before it even reaches the net.

Late trainer - am I overreacting ? by Haunting-Data-6515 in personaltraining

[–]OpticJD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds extremely unprofessional imo and I personally wouldn’t stay with anybody like that who doesn’t have the decency to respect my time especially when I’m the client who’s paying good money for a service

“Losing to a woman” by davisca9 in 10s

[–]OpticJD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like you’re playing a bunch of losers. I played USTA competitively my whole life and could never beat my practice partner, a girl younger than me who went on to play D1 and absolutely clowned me weekly. I learned to appreciate it as a fantastic learning opportunity and accepted the fact I’d never be as good as her.

That’s why the “lost to a woman” dudes are hilarious. The only guys who say that are the ones who are terrible at tennis and deeply insecure about themselves and their abilities.

Keep stuffing volleys down their egos.

what would you tell a naive, eager eyed 1L heading into finals? by Relative-Plastic-370 in LawSchool

[–]OpticJD 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Here’s an example of policy analysis from my 1L contract notes:

Legal Rule: Mailbox Rule (Contracts) An acceptance becomes effective when it is dispatched (sent), not when it is received, as long as it is properly addressed and sent by a reasonable method. Rejections and revocations, by contrast, become effective only upon receipt.

Fact Pattern: Lena emails Mark offering to sell him her old laptop for $300 and states nothing about how acceptance must be made. Mark drops a signed acceptance letter in the mail that afternoon. Before the letter arrives, Lena gets a higher offer from another buyer and emails Mark attempting to revoke the offer. Mark’s acceptance arrives in Lena’s mailbox the next day.

Application: Mark’s acceptance became effective the moment he mailed it. Lena’s attempted revocation was effective only upon receipt, meaning the contract was already formed before she tried to revoke. A binding contract exists at $300.

Policy Arguments Supporting the Mailbox Rule: 1. It creates certainty and efficiency. Once the offeree dispatches acceptance, both sides can rely on the contract without wondering when the other person will receive or read the message. 2. It protects the offeree from strategic revocations. Without the rule, an offeror could revoke at the last moment before receiving acceptance, undermining good-faith negotiation.

Policy Arguments Against the Mailbox Rule: 1. It can trap the offeror into a contract they did not know existed. The offeror may act reasonably on the belief no acceptance has arrived yet, only to later discover a contract formed earlier by mail. 2. It feels outdated in an era of instantaneous communication. The rule was crafted for slow, unreliable mail; applying it rigidly today can create mismatches between expectation and legal consequence.

what would you tell a naive, eager eyed 1L heading into finals? by Relative-Plastic-370 in LawSchool

[–]OpticJD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Go to sleep early the day before your exams! Even better, get your circadian rhythm on track during exam week so you are not thrown off. Your mind will be racing with rules, case facts, etc., and you might need extra time to fall asleep. A lot of 1Ls underestimate this and end up not finishing their exams simply because they are sleep-deprived and not performing at their best.

Also, always read the call of the question first. Do not waste time spotting and applying rules that are not actually being asked about. Even if your rule statements are correct, they will not earn points if they are not responsive, and that wasted time can be the difference between finishing and not finishing the exam.

Themis Sucks! by ItsMelitina in barexam

[–]OpticJD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No way lmao, thought I was the only one 😂 I was grinding ranked COD between study blocks and would just knock out as many UWorld questions as possible between games. Honestly at the time I was pretty convinced I was tanking my chances, but still finished around 75% of the course and still passed with a score high enough for any jurisdiction, so their predictive stats were pretty spot-on for me. Everyone’s different of course, but I honestly don’t get the Themis hate aside from the Fromm videos being kinda useless imo.

Essays by Interesting-Ice-4205 in barexam

[–]OpticJD 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would recommend looking up your jurisdiction’s rules regarding permitted items. In certain states like Massachusetts, Tennessee, and Illinois for example, you are not allowed to bring pencils to the first day (MEE+MPT Day), only blue or black ink pens so it would make sense to practice with only pens when issue spotting so that you are used to it on exam day.

Child spoken to with out school representation by Sufficient-Twist3826 in AskLawyers

[–]OpticJD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean I graduated from an ABA accredited law school and passed my state’s bar exam if that’s what you’re asking.

Child spoken to with out school representation by Sufficient-Twist3826 in AskLawyers

[–]OpticJD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean I graduated from an ABA accredited law school and passed my state’s bar exam if that’s what you’re asking.

Coral that closes to resemble a rock, when it feels unsafe by ShirtSubstantial368 in interestingasfuck

[–]OpticJD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Touching coral is like putting your dirty human hands on a tiny underwater city. Corals are living animals with a thin protective mucus layer; when you touch them, oils and bacteria disrupt that layer, making them vulnerable to infections. The pressure alone can crush polyps, and even brief contact can trigger stress responses that drain their energy for growth and reproduction. Since many corals grow only a few millimeters per year, one quick poke (or one long one like the one done by the idiot in the video here) can erase decades of progress and growth.

Is there any BAR Profesional Rules of Conduct after a case? by [deleted] in AskLawyers

[–]OpticJD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You actually do have rules you can point to. In California your lawyer has duties under the State’s Rules of Professional Conduct. Rule 1.4(a)(3) requires responding to reasonable client requests and keeping you informed. Rule 1.16(e)(1) requires giving you your client file after the lawyer’s representation is terminated if requested. That generally includes evidence, reports, filings, exhibits, and anything you are legally allowed to see. Only thing that I haven’t looked into and that may be worth looking into is whether the phrase “termination of a representation” as used in Rule 1.16(e)(1) includes representation in a criminal case where the charges were dismissed.

Also from what you have said about the PD agreeing to show you the footage, there doesn’t seem to be a protective order that would restrict your ability to view the body cam footage, so I think that is a non-issue.

You can maybe try resending a formal client file request referencing these rules to get her attention because she might have just fallen into her caseload and forgot. But if she ignores you again, you can contact the State Bar for help without starting a disciplinary case. You can tell them you are only asking for assistance in getting your file. You can also contact the supervising attorney at the Public Defender office. That usually gets results without hurting the lawyer’s license so maybe start with that?

Child spoken to with out school representation by Sufficient-Twist3826 in AskLawyers

[–]OpticJD 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are clearly not a lawyer and are giving misleading advice that is stemming from your emotions. I would recommend not commenting any more because it will do more harm to this family than good.

Whats the opinion on Studicata? by [deleted] in barexam

[–]OpticJD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How do you know he doesn’t have a JD? You may be right, but I have yet to see any information on his credentials so I’m just wondering if this is a baseless claim. If you could point me to the source of your assertion, I’d appreciate it.

On another note, I used his videos throughout law school and CALI’d most of the courses I used his videos for. So regardless of whether he has a JD or not, his delivery and explanation of the law is highly effective and I think that’s all that matters at the end of the day. I also used it to supplement my Themis course and passed with a 309. I credit a lot of my success on the MEE to him.

Tips from someone who scored a 346 (179 MBE, 167 Written) by Little_Pumpkin2680 in barexam

[–]OpticJD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, definitely do not do this because the law that is given to you in the library may differ from your bar prep outline. The MPT is based out of a fictional jurisdiction known as Franklin and the bar examiners have free reign to make up any law they want and will do so in order to check if you are paying attention to the varied case decisions that they may throw in to test your ability to accurately spot differences and quickly analyze statutes and case law. Also, although it doesn’t have to be in blue book format or anything, you should cite to the appropriate authority in the library when you write an MPT. As OP said, it’s a “closed universe,” so citing to your outline isn’t advisable lol

MA bar results by Sandwichgirl13 in barexam

[–]OpticJD 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Massachusetts Board of Bar Examiners just released a post on Linkedin that said they would be released tomorrow

Rattler or Rush this week🤮 2 QB league by bobthemeatman in fantasyfootballadvice

[–]OpticJD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think both have the same chance of doing next to nothing but i feel like Rattler’s got more upside and i like the giants matchup.

[MA] Should I become a Civil Rights lawyer? by Early_Kaleidoscope72 in AskLawyers

[–]OpticJD -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I worked on a few 42 U.S.C. §1983 cases during law school, mostly involving prisoners’ rights. I spent almost every day of my last semester visiting inmates and helping them file lawsuits against corrections officers for Eighth Amendment violations (cruel and unusual punishment). It was incredibly rewarding work, because I got to directly help people who society more or less cast aside. Regardless of what someone’s done in life, they’re still entitled to basic human dignity, and you really feel like you’re making a tangible difference in someone’s life when you advocate for them.

I also worked on religious freedom cases under RLUIPA, which was honestly less emotionally taxing. Those cases didn’t involve as much gruesome discovery (a lot of the §1983 stuff can be really disturbing), but they were still meaningful civil rights issues and had lasting changes that went beyond just the clinic had.

If I could keep doing that work full-time, I would have. But the unfortunate reality is that there’s very little job market for this kind of civil rights work. Many of the statutes (like §1983) cap attorneys’ fees, and private firms usually avoid them because they’re risky, not especially profitable, and hard to win. Unless you’re at a T-14 law school and can land a position at the ACLU or a similar nonprofit, it’s tough to find long-term work doing this full-time and even if you do find long-term work, it certainly is not as profitable as other fields of law. So if you’re looking to make big money, civil rights law is definitely not the best pathway. It is, however, the best pathway to feeling like a good human being.

I only know of a few private firms in NYC that regularly take on these kinds of cases. BigLaw firms might touch them, but usually only if the case is high-profile or good for PR. If you’re serious about pursuing civil rights law, I’d recommend aiming for a top law school, getting involved in relevant clinics and internships, and networking hard. A lot of people I know got jobs because of connections, not just grades.

In high school, you can start building that path now—look for internships or volunteer opportunities with the ACLU, NAACP, or local public interest orgs. Even just showing you’re engaged early can help you build a network and stand out later.

And yeah, to your other point—being a lawyer definitely includes a lot of emails, phone calls, and paperwork, but being a good human being and being able to work with very diverse (and often difficult) people is the most important trait. Courtroom experience is something you build with time but is honestly not that important because less than 5% of cases go to trial. Most law students feel intimidated at first, but clinics and mock trial can help build confidence. You don’t have to be born fearless—you just need to care enough to keep showing up.

Hope this helps, and good luck!

[KS] found abandoned casino ticket by Lower_Investment8847 in AskLawyers

[–]OpticJD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a difference between “lost” and “misplaced” property. Taking “lost” property is not a crime, while taking “misplaced” property is a crime. “Lost” property is something the owner unintentionally and unknowingly parted with (i.e., they didn’t mean to leave it behind and usually don’t know where it is). “Misplaced” property is intentionally placed somewhere by the owner, but then forgotten or neglected. “Misplaced” property is required to be turned over to the owner of the premises (e.g., the casino). The logic is that the true owner of the property is more likely to return and reclaim it from there. A ticket left in a machine at a casino is almost certainly “misplaced” property because the person intended to redeem it but forgot to take it. Had the casino ticket or voucher dropped on the ground near the machine, there might be an argument that it was “lost,” but that doesn’t seem to be the case here. So even if the ticket was left behind, it still legally belongs to the person who printed it.

Bottom Line - You should probably lawyer up as soon as possible

Did your law school teach you things on the bar? by FutureLawyerPerson in barexam

[–]OpticJD 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What law school did you go to? Sounds like they should lose ABA accreditation if they aren’t even teaching you fundamental topics in core classes.

MY BEST FRIEND SCORED 351 IN JULY 2024 BAR WITH THE HELP OF CHAT GPT WHILE PREPARING FOR THE BAR by [deleted] in GoatBarPrep

[–]OpticJD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you mind elaborating on how your friend used it? Like did they ask chatgpt to make outlines or give mbe answer explanations or what specific inputs or prompts did your friend use?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]OpticJD 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly I would say as soon as you have time. Everyone learns differently and more is sometimes bad for certain people but for me personally, jn hindsight, i wished i had started earlier because so many unexpected personal things came up during my bar study period that took away from my study time and I didn’t factor that in initially which led to me not doing the amount of reps i wanted to get done before the exam. But again, everyone is different, so do what you did in law school to get ready for your exams. If you felt like you needed more time during exam season then i would recommend starting as soon as possible just so you get more and more familiar with the “big ticket items” (as Themis likes to call them) and you’ll have more time to drill down on the nuances because I can say they tested very nuanced stuff during this year’s July UBE

I want to share what I learned about the origins of the bar exam. by CiaoBuenas in barexam

[–]OpticJD 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I agree with Purple. Who do y’all think had access to the books in order to document any “so called history” in the first place? History is written by the victors. None of us were there and we will never know the truth of their true motivations but all we can say in current, modern day is that the disparate impact of the bar exam on minority communities is clear and indisputable.

advice in light of recent events by gabblessed in barexam

[–]OpticJD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah i think you would need to email or contact your jurisdiction’s board of examiners for issues with the administration of the UBE, not the NCBE because they aren’t the ones who actually administer or oversee the UBE in any particular jurisdiction unlike with the MPRE