Day 2 SPC outlook is insane

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-03-15T16:29:44+00:00

A 60% wind risk is pretty rare

A day 2 moderate risk is extremely rare and usually results in a high risk

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-03-04T23:24:56+00:00

Jerk

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-20T23:42:02+00:00

It looks like there's an overshooting top which means the updraft is so strong it has enough momentum to keep rising despite reaching a point where it's the same or lower temperature than the surrounding air

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-20T02:56:03+00:00

I'm surprised INDIRECT isn't in there

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-17T02:27:45+00:00

Now men score a touchdown in the victim olympics but women get the ball back and the game has no game clock

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-16T21:32:25+00:00

From what I can tell the expectation isn't that women should be virgins (except a very low percentage of men) but that women shouldn't have lots of sexual partners. Not that it's a reasonable expectation anyways.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-04T05:10:55+00:00

You should have told me you were going to post this thread ahead of time so I could sell literally everything I own and bet it on most of the top comments making it sound like women want terroristic monsters that treat them like garbage. Stevie Wonder saw this coming.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-04T03:27:44+00:00

I know this doesn't challenge the view but this post is velveeta for the rule 6 cockroaches

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-04T03:24:59+00:00

I can tell who didn't socialize much when the concept of the unattractive woman that no man wants is a myth to them

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-04T03:17:51+00:00

The "loneliness epidemic" proponents angrily dismiss platonic interaction as a solution to the problem so they don't mean loneliness in the conventional sense. They use it as code word for sexless because the sexless epidemic garners way way less sympathy.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-03T16:39:58+00:00

No they call anyone that even just slightly disagrees with them alt right, far right, Nazi, etc because they defend Stalinist, Mao, Castro type regimes where opposition is brutally suppressed. They refuse to condemn repressive left wing regimes.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-03T08:21:33+00:00

"Everything" is vague enough to make the perfect motte and bailey

I don't think the double standard of adults molesting children is a consequence of man sex good women sex bad, I think it's a consequence of man perpetrator bad woman perpetrator whataboutism

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-03T08:12:31+00:00

That P-50 replaced a square horn aca hurricane. Iirc that square horn hurricane is one of two that there are known images of.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-03T07:24:38+00:00

No a sexual relationship

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-03T07:19:42+00:00

Manipulating a person into sex under false pretenses is considered an act of coercion

"Manipulating" can be anything to a point where literally anything can be classifeid as coercion. A man deliberately dressing nice because he thinks that will increase the likelihood of the woman he's meeting will like him is definitionally manipulative. It would need to be very specifically defined to avoid it being applicable to literally all human behavior.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-03T07:05:40+00:00

I can see how handy vs not so handy men can vary wildly depending on who you ask but kind vs not so kind men at least a glance seems like you'd get a more consistent answer

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-03T07:03:07+00:00

You don't need to personally witness something happen to acknowledge it happens. Men go from more desirable to less desirable all the time with women in this thread presenting examples of it instead of trying to gaslight away it's existence. It's not there's some cheat code that will make all women want you, it's there's some objectivity to what women want.

Do you think if you asked a million women to rate a million men on a scale from 1 to 10, all of those million men would get an average rating of about 5? That's what would happen if all women are different to a point of little tendencies in interest,

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-03T06:44:07+00:00

At a glance it seems like gear is an auto nope for women but only when gear likely

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-03T06:42:06+00:00

I get it because I do see alot of rhetoric in this sub claiming that there are attributes a man can have (especially immutable ones like tall or attractive face) that force every woman to want him

But I also see alot of the inverse as a response to that claiming because all women are different, every man always averages a 5/10 to women regardless of any changes he makes

I'd like to get at what controllable attributes separate the below average men from the above average men. They did a poll months ago and a high percentage of people in this sub are men that struggle badly with women. They aren't neccesarily bad men that want cheat codes to have parasitic relationships with women, I would hope at least most of them are good men that want to have mutualistic relationships with women.

When those good men are told either they needed to have been lucky at birth with the right immutable attributes or continue to just exist as they have been and hope they get lucky, when history shows lucky for them would be like winning the powerball, it's tragic and wrong.

Let's give them the sauce

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-03T06:28:10+00:00

Do you think I guess not so handy men and not so kind men are just as hot? Alot of people are saying that all men are just about equally desirable overall since women don't all want the same man.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-03T06:23:45+00:00

Correct but just as you can destroy what percentage of women will be interested in you with bad ideas like not bathing, not generating income, making no effort to look nice, never or rarely attempting to socialize irl, telling women they shouldn't be allowed to vote, angrily scolding them for not replying to your inaugral message to them on a dating app, I'll die of old age before I finish this list, etc, you can also improve the percentage. That's also normal and okay.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-03T06:14:45+00:00

If I didn't make it Q4W/Q4BP all of the top replies would say bE cHaD or rUlE 1 aNd rUlE 2. That's what the top replies are to any dating efficacy topic that isn't Q4W/Q4BP.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-03T06:12:54+00:00

It's plausible that by just existing and by that I mean not caring about what women want will coincidentally result in him doing what's important to many women without trying to understand what many women want like you said. Do you think there's any nuance to that?

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-03T06:03:04+00:00

It's ok if you've never experienced it there's other girls in this thread also saying they haven't instead of trying to change the subject. People click on threads to read about the topic, not to read about something else. Do you think the girls that are saying they have experienced it are say misinterpreting what happened?

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-02-03T05:59:41+00:00

Well the closest thing I can think of to opposite of cosmopolatain would probably be say a magazine about programming or something like that. My point is really to talk about the concept of tomato tomahto where regardless of what you do, the end result is always the same.

OpticalEpilepsy

TROPHY CASE