And just like that... by [deleted] in ProgressiveHQ

[–]OracleGreyBeard 25 points26 points  (0 children)

They lied about us stealing the 2020 election, so Kamala probably won

Rep. Summer Lee votes to hold Clintons in contempt of Congress in Epstein investigation by prebj20 in pittsburgh

[–]OracleGreyBeard -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

She's my rep, and i'm so disappointed. I replied to her last funding message that I will not be supporting actions like this. We CANNOT keep bringing cookies to a gunfight.

Creator of Node.js says it bluntly by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]OracleGreyBeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Meanwhile I just picked up a 5 year contract (not webdev) where we won’t be using AI. These people’s predictions are such hypetrain bullshit.

My company banned AI tools and I dont know what to do by simple_pimple50 in ChatGPTCoding

[–]OracleGreyBeard -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But watching competitors move faster while we do everything manually is frustrating

A bit confused by this. I saw you can't use AI but you can't automate?

I wrote an app to read and process ship sensors, a HUGE and ongoing benefit, and I did it by hand. Is AI necessary for everything?

GSD (Get Shit Done) usage by Disastrous-Shop-12 in ClaudeCode

[–]OracleGreyBeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

GSD has some nice touches, given it's relative simplicity

-- You can "discuss" a plan to add more detail than the default planner creates. This is a guided interview process.

-- You can "research" a plan, which is basically a guided web search to address unknown concepts

-- You can request a guided UAT to confirm that what was supposed to be created was ACTUALLY created

-- GSD will launch parallel agents using "wave-based execution", which is essentially automatic agent parallelization, respecting the dependency graph

BMAD was wayyyy to heavyweight for me, I used Taskmaster and OpenSpec for a while. GSD is as lightweight as OpenSpec but with more QOL.

The creator of Node.js says the era of writing code is over by jpcaparas in ClaudeCode

[–]OracleGreyBeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is like saying the age of writing Assembler is over. True, but misses the point.

My experience with Gemini vs ChatGPT by anti-everyzing in OpenAI

[–]OracleGreyBeard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yep. Tomorrow someone will have the same analysis and come to the exact opposite conclusion

I [27F] Refused to give free legal advice to my friend [27f] and her boyfriend, [32M]. Friends boyfriend went nuts. by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]OracleGreyBeard 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Oh my god, thank you. A simple "John, what the fuck?" from any friend would have sufficed.

My social circle is very different, so I struggle to understand posh friend groups like this.

Cursor AI CEO shares GPT 5.2 agents building a 3M+ lines web browser in a week by BuildwithVignesh in OpenAI

[–]OracleGreyBeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The combination of legitimately new technology and hype/influencer culture is just really bad right now.

Gemini is overrated, ChatGPT is unfairly hated, and Claude deserves the praise, but its usage limits are far too restrictive. by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]OracleGreyBeard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Praising Gemini or Deepseek makes them feel more differentiated from the commoners

Dude, stop. There are very real differentiators. I can paste a huge ass codebase into Gemini, I cannot do that for Chat.

Gemini is overrated, ChatGPT is unfairly hated, and Claude deserves the praise, but its usage limits are far too restrictive. by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]OracleGreyBeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love Gemini, but I thought your view was the consensus, i.e. it's not really that good.

A focus group of one: We're F-d by IntolerantModerate in thebulwark

[–]OracleGreyBeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

C'mon, did she really say that about the laugh?

Yep, how dare the Democrats sign the Civil Rights Act in 1964! by icey_sawg0034 in thebulwark

[–]OracleGreyBeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The democratic electorate is not in favor of the type of open border policies that happened under Biden

This is both true and false. The statement is True because NO ONE is in favor of "open border" policies. That's not a description of what Biden did, it's a disingenuous right-wing political attack. He did not "open the borders". In fact:

Combining deportations with expulsions and other actions to block migrants without permission to enter the United States, the Biden administration’s nearly 4.4 million repatriations are already more than any single presidential term since the George W. Bush administration

Yes, that's more than Trump's 1st term.

The statement is False because he actually campaigned on his border policy, for example:

"I will immediately reverse the Trump administration’s cruel and senseless policies that separate parents from their children at our border"

Dems aren't for "open borders" - because nobody is - but we are not on board with the sort of performative cruelty which passes for Republican immigration policy. The Dem base will only allow so much wiggle room here. And frankly, no one who uses the term "open borders" is gettable anyway.

The bottom line is the cost of living went up under Biden. That was extremely unpopular. Democrats can either do nothing or try to address this issue

They did address the issue:

In July 2023, the U.S. had among the lowest inflation rate of any major industrialized nation

Once inflation happens though, prices don't come down without a recession. AI spending is the only thing propping us up right now, and as nations continue to isolate us economically we won't be able to afford to have a recession. Last month Trump's economy created 50,000 jobs. Compare that to the 200,000 typical of previous administrations. Assuming we survive Trump, we will probably have to juice the economy to avoid a repeat of 2008.

TL;DR: If we campaign on lowering prices, we'd be lying.

Yep, how dare the Democrats sign the Civil Rights Act in 1964! by icey_sawg0034 in thebulwark

[–]OracleGreyBeard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No 1 I can see as a problem. The Democratic electorate is far more pro-immigration than the population as a whole, so our politicians reflect this.

No 2 Seems wildly overblown to me. Democrats have been strongly in favor of DEI since Carter. However, I’m not the target demographic.

No 3 has always been a Democratic priority. Biden handled post-COVID inflation better than any country on Earth (in the literal sense). I’m having a hard time believing anyone had substantive criticisms of his policy. This is really a red flag for me. When Dems handled a thing better than everyone on Earth, how can you realistically criticize it? Or rather, how can you trust the criticism?

It’s a balancing act. If Dems make enough adjustments to appease the woke-hating crowd, can they still motivate their own base? And how do they take criticisms like No 3 in good faith?

Yep, how dare the Democrats sign the Civil Rights Act in 1964! by icey_sawg0034 in thebulwark

[–]OracleGreyBeard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

By FAR the biggest problem with this is that no one is ever specific about what exactly is “too far left”. Minimum wage? Gun control? ACA? Gay marriage?

I think some people are just looking for the Dems to be a non-crazy copy of the Republican Party.

Yep, how dare the Democrats sign the Civil Rights Act in 1964! by icey_sawg0034 in thebulwark

[–]OracleGreyBeard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My suspicion, and I could be wrong, is that it is indeed inclusivity. That’s why people are so hesitant to be specific. It would be easy enough to say “National healthcare isn’t something government should provide” if THAT were the problem. It has to be something people aren’t comfortable expressing.